"Where does it hurt?" - Dataset and Study on Physician Intent Trajectories in Doctor Patient Dialogues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19077v1
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:38:17 GMT
• Title: "Where does it hurt?" - Dataset and Study on Physician Intent Trajectories in Doctor Patient Dialogues
• Authors: Tom Röhr, Soumyadeep Roy, Fares Al Mohamad, Jens-Michalis Papaioannou, Wolfgang Nejdl, Felix Gers, Alexander Löser,
• Abstract summary: This study is the first to study physician intent trajectories in doctor-patient dialogues.<n>We use the Ambient Clinical Intelligence Benchmark' dataset for our study.<n>We also report for the first time common trajectories in medical dialogue structures that provide valuable insights for designing differential diagnosis' systems.
• Score: 41.28959792853309
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In a doctor-patient dialogue, the primary objective of physicians is to diagnose patients and propose a treatment plan. Medical doctors guide these conversations through targeted questioning to efficiently gather the information required to provide the best possible outcomes for patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that studies physician intent trajectories in doctor-patient dialogues. We use the `Ambient Clinical Intelligence Benchmark' (Aci-bench) dataset for our study. We collaborate with medical professionals to develop a fine-grained taxonomy of physician intents based on the SOAP framework (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan). We then conduct a large-scale annotation effort to label over 5000 doctor-patient turns with the help of a large number of medical experts recruited using Prolific, a popular crowd-sourcing platform. This large labeled dataset is an important resource contribution that we use for benchmarking the state-of-the-art generative and encoder models for medical intent classification tasks. Our findings show that our models understand the general structure of medical dialogues with high accuracy, but often fail to identify transitions between SOAP categories. We also report for the first time common trajectories in medical dialogue structures that provide valuable insights for designing `differential diagnosis' systems. Finally, we extensively study the impact of intent filtering for medical dialogue summarization and observe a significant boost in performance. We make the codes and data, including annotation guidelines, publicly available at https://github.com/DATEXIS/medical-intent-classification.

Related papers

• MediTOD: An English Dialogue Dataset for Medical History Taking with Comprehensive Annotations [23.437292621092823]
  We introduce MediTOD, a dataset of doctor-patient dialogues in English for the medical history-taking task. We devise a questionnaire-based labeling scheme tailored to the medical domain. Then, medical professionals create the dataset with high-quality comprehensive annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T06:38:22Z)
• RuleAlign: Making Large Language Models Better Physicians with Diagnostic Rule Alignment [54.91736546490813]
  We introduce the RuleAlign framework, designed to align Large Language Models with specific diagnostic rules. We develop a medical dialogue dataset comprising rule-based communications between patients and physicians. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:44:40Z)
• A Benchmark for Automatic Medical Consultation System: Frameworks, Tasks and Datasets [70.32630628211803]
  We propose two frameworks to support automatic medical consultation, namely doctor-patient dialogue understanding and task-oriented interaction. A new large medical dialogue dataset with multi-level fine-grained annotations is introduced. We report a set of benchmark results for each task, which shows the usability of the dataset and sets a baseline for future studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-19T16:43:21Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)
• MedDG: An Entity-Centric Medical Consultation Dataset for Entity-Aware Medical Dialogue Generation [86.38736781043109]
  We build and release a large-scale high-quality Medical Dialogue dataset related to 12 types of common Gastrointestinal diseases named MedDG. We propose two kinds of medical dialogue tasks based on MedDG dataset. One is the next entity prediction and the other is the doctor response generation. Experimental results show that the pre-train language models and other baselines struggle on both tasks with poor performance in our dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:34:33Z)
• BiteNet: Bidirectional Temporal Encoder Network to Predict Medical Outcomes [53.163089893876645]
  We propose a novel self-attention mechanism that captures the contextual dependency and temporal relationships within a patient's healthcare journey. An end-to-end bidirectional temporal encoder network (BiteNet) then learns representations of the patient's journeys. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our methods on two supervised prediction and two unsupervised clustering tasks with a real-world EHR dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T00:42:36Z)
• Dr. Summarize: Global Summarization of Medical Dialogue by Exploiting Local Structures [4.3012765978447565]
  We present a novel approach to medical conversation summarization that leverages the unique and independent local structures created when gathering a patient's medical history. Our approach is preferred on twice the number of pointers to the baseline pointer generator model and captures most or all of the information in 80% of the conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T07:35:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.