Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20040v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:50:17 GMT
• Title: Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systems
• Abstract summary: Model Science places the trained model at the core of analysis, aiming to interact, verify, explain, and control its behavior.<n>The proposed framework aims to guide the development of credible, safe, and human-aligned AI systems.
• Score: 30.654411279722396
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The growing adoption of foundation models calls for a paradigm shift from Data Science to Model Science. Unlike data-centric approaches, Model Science places the trained model at the core of analysis, aiming to interact, verify, explain, and control its behavior across diverse operational contexts. This paper introduces a conceptual framework for a new discipline called Model Science, along with the proposal for its four key pillars: Verification, which requires strict, context-aware evaluation protocols; Explanation, which is understood as various approaches to explore of internal model operations; Control, which integrates alignment techniques to steer model behavior; and Interface, which develops interactive and visual explanation tools to improve human calibration and decision-making. The proposed framework aims to guide the development of credible, safe, and human-aligned AI systems.

Related papers

• World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI [123.5787299299832]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have achieved strong semantic generalization for embodied policy learning.<n>They learn reactive observation-to-action mappings without explicitly modeling how the physical world evolves under intervention.<n>A growing body of work addresses this limitation by integrating world models, predictive models of environment dynamics, into the action generation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T13:10:52Z)
• Surrogates for Physics-based and Data-driven Modelling of Parametric Systems: Review and New Perspectives [0.0]
  Surrogate models provide compact relations between user-defined input parameters and output quantities of interest.<n>This article reviews established methodologies for constructing surrogate models exploiting either knowledge of the governing laws and the dynamical structure of the system.<n>It aims at synthesising established knowledge, recent advances, and new perspectives on: dimensionality reduction, physics-based, and data-driven surrogate modelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T10:16:53Z)
• A Survey on Generative Recommendation: Data, Model, and Tasks [55.36322811257545]
  generative recommendation reconceptualizes recommendation as a generation task rather than discriminative scoring.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive examination through a unified tripartite framework spanning data, model, and task dimensions.<n>We identify five key advantages: world knowledge integration, natural language understanding, reasoning capabilities, scaling laws, and creative generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T04:02:58Z)
• Vision Language Action Models in Robotic Manipulation: A Systematic Review [1.1767330101986737]
  Vision Language Action (VLA) models represent a transformative shift in robotics.<n>This review presents a comprehensive and forward-looking synthesis of the VLA paradigm.<n>We analyze 102 VLA models, 26 foundational datasets, and 12 simulation platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T18:00:34Z)
• Neural Network Reprogrammability: A Unified Theme on Model Reprogramming, Prompt Tuning, and Prompt Instruction [55.914891182214475]
  We introduce neural network reprogrammability as a unifying framework for model adaptation.<n>We present a taxonomy that categorizes such information manipulation approaches across four key dimensions.<n>We also analyze remaining technical challenges and ethical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T05:42:27Z)
• Information Science Principles of Machine Learning: A Causal Chain Meta-Framework Based on Formalized Information Mapping [7.299890614172539]
  This study addresses key challenges in machine learning, namely the absence of a unified formal theoretical framework and the lack of foundational theories for model interpretability and ethical safety.<n>We first construct a formal information model, explicitly defining the ontological states and carrier mappings of typical machine learning stages.<n>By introducing learnable and processable predicates, as well as learning and processing functions, we analyze the causal chain logic and constraint laws governing machine learning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T14:39:41Z)
• A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [59.61734783818073]
  The period from 2019 to the present has represented one of the biggest paradigm shifts in information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP)<n>We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs)<n>We conclude with a forward-looking discussion of emerging challenges and future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z)
• A Survey of World Models for Autonomous Driving [55.520179689933904]
  Recent breakthroughs in autonomous driving have been propelled by advances in robust world modeling.<n>World models offer high-fidelity representations of the driving environment that integrate multi-sensor data, semantic cues, and temporal dynamics.<n>Future research must address key challenges in self-supervised representation learning, multimodal fusion, and advanced simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T04:00:02Z)
• Foundation Models for Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities [124.79381732197649]
  Foundation models pretrained on diverse data at scale have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in a wide range of vision and language tasks. New paradigms are emerging for training foundation models to interact with other agents and perform long-term reasoning. Research at the intersection of foundation models and decision making holds tremendous promise for creating powerful new systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:44:07Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• Knowledge-Guided Dynamic Systems Modeling: A Case Study on Modeling River Water Quality [8.110949636804774]
  Modeling real-world phenomena is a focus of many science and engineering efforts, such as ecological modeling and financial forecasting. Building an accurate model for complex and dynamic systems improves understanding of underlying processes and leads to resource efficiency. At the opposite extreme, data-driven modeling learns a model directly from data, requiring extensive data and potentially generating overfitting. We focus on an intermediate approach, model revision, in which prior knowledge and data are combined to achieve the best of both worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T06:31:38Z)
• Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters [105.43098326577434]
  One of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model and that of the downstream planner or policy. We propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space. We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T16:42:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.