Provable Benefits of In-Tool Learning for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20755v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:12:19 GMT
• Title: Provable Benefits of In-Tool Learning for Large Language Models
• Authors: Sam Houliston, Ambroise Odonnat, Charles Arnal, Vivien Cabannes,
• Abstract summary: We show that tool-use enables factual recall via a simple and efficient circuit construction.<n>We further show that for pretrained large language models, teaching tool-use and general rules is more effective than finetuning facts into memory.
• Score: 17.792294335402705
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Tool-augmented language models, equipped with retrieval, memory, or external APIs, are reshaping AI, yet their theoretical advantages remain underexplored. In this paper, we address this question by demonstrating the benefits of in-tool learning (external retrieval) over in-weight learning (memorization) for factual recall. We show that the number of facts a model can memorize solely in its weights is fundamentally limited by its parameter count. In contrast, we prove that tool-use enables unbounded factual recall via a simple and efficient circuit construction. These results are validated in controlled experiments, where tool-using models consistently outperform memorizing ones. We further show that for pretrained large language models, teaching tool-use and general rules is more effective than finetuning facts into memory. Our work provides both a theoretical and empirical foundation, establishing why tool-augmented workflows are not just practical, but provably more scalable.

Related papers

• Understanding Tool-Integrated Reasoning [9.235747697967984]
  We study why Tool-Integrated Reasoning makes Large Language Models (LLMs) more capable.<n>LLMs integrated with tools like Python code interpreters show great promise, but a principled theory explaining why this paradigm is effective has been missing.<n>We demonstrate that tools enable a strict expansion of the model's empirical and feasible support, breaking the capability ceiling of pure-text models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T17:03:46Z)
• Forgetting: A New Mechanism Towards Better Large Language Model Fine-tuning [51.92313556418432]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) plays a critical role for pretrained large language models (LLMs)<n>We suggest categorizing tokens within each corpus into two parts -- positive and negative tokens -- based on whether they are useful to improve model performance.<n>We conduct experiments on well-established benchmarks, finding that this forgetting mechanism not only improves overall model performance and also facilitate more diverse model responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T11:22:23Z)
• LLM Library Learning Fails: A LEGO-Prover Case Study [20.25809428140996]
  We investigate LEGO-Prover, which purports to learn reusable lemmas for mathematical reasoning.<n>We find no evidence of the direct reuse of learned lemmas, and find evidence against the soft reuse of learned lemmas.<n>Our findings suggest that serious misconceptions exist as to the effectiveness of these techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T21:53:51Z)
• FactLLaMA: Optimizing Instruction-Following Language Models with External Knowledge for Automated Fact-Checking [10.046323978189847]
  We propose combining the power of instruction-following language models with external evidence retrieval to enhance fact-checking performance. Our approach involves leveraging search engines to retrieve relevant evidence for a given input claim. Then, we instruct-tune an open-sourced language model, called LLaMA, using this evidence, enabling it to predict the veracity of the input claim more accurately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T04:14:39Z)
• Language models are weak learners [71.33837923104808]
  We show that prompt-based large language models can operate effectively as weak learners. We incorporate these models into a boosting approach, which can leverage the knowledge within the model to outperform traditional tree-based boosting. Results illustrate the potential for prompt-based LLMs to function not just as few-shot learners themselves, but as components of larger machine learning pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T02:39:19Z)
• Self-Checker: Plug-and-Play Modules for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models [75.75038268227554]
  Self-Checker is a framework comprising a set of plug-and-play modules that facilitate fact-checking. This framework provides a fast and efficient way to construct fact-checking systems in low-resource environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T01:46:07Z)
• Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools [62.04867424598204]
  Language models (LMs) exhibit remarkable abilities to solve new tasks from just a few examples or textual instructions, especially at scale. We show that LMs can teach themselves to use external tools via simple APIs and achieve the best of both worlds. We introduce Toolformer, a model trained to decide which APIs to call, when to call them, what arguments to pass, and how to best incorporate the results into future token prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T16:49:57Z)
• Do Language Embeddings Capture Scales? [54.1633257459927]
  We show that pretrained language models capture a significant amount of information about the scalar magnitudes of objects. We identify contextual information in pre-training and numeracy as two key factors affecting their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-11T21:11:09Z)
• Leap-Of-Thought: Teaching Pre-Trained Models to Systematically Reason Over Implicit Knowledge [96.92252296244233]
  Large pre-trained language models (LMs) acquire some reasoning capacity, but this ability is difficult to control. We show that LMs can be trained to reliably perform systematic reasoning combining both implicit, pre-trained knowledge and explicit natural language statements. Our work paves a path towards open-domain systems that constantly improve by interacting with users who can instantly correct a model by adding simple natural language statements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:02:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.