ProactiveEval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Proactive Dialogue Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20973v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:26:44 GMT
• Title: ProactiveEval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Proactive Dialogue Agents
• Abstract summary: We propose ProactiveEval, a unified framework for evaluating proactive dialogue capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>This framework decomposes proactive dialogue into target planning and dialogue guidance, establishing evaluation metrics across various domains.<n>We show that DeepSeek-R1 and Claude-3.7-Sonnet exhibit exceptional performance on target planning and dialogue guidance tasks.
• Score: 29.03683444493195
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Proactive dialogue has emerged as a critical and challenging research problem in advancing large language models (LLMs). Existing works predominantly focus on domain-specific or task-oriented scenarios, which leads to fragmented evaluations and limits the comprehensive exploration of models' proactive conversation abilities. In this work, we propose ProactiveEval, a unified framework designed for evaluating proactive dialogue capabilities of LLMs. This framework decomposes proactive dialogue into target planning and dialogue guidance, establishing evaluation metrics across various domains. Moreover, it also enables the automatic generation of diverse and challenging evaluation data. Based on the proposed framework, we develop 328 evaluation environments spanning 6 distinct domains. Through experiments with 22 different types of LLMs, we show that DeepSeek-R1 and Claude-3.7-Sonnet exhibit exceptional performance on target planning and dialogue guidance tasks, respectively. Finally, we investigate how reasoning capabilities influence proactive behaviors and discuss their implications for future model development.

Related papers

• Enhancing Goal-oriented Proactive Dialogue Systems via Consistency Reflection and Correction [14.520176577205754]
  We introduce a model-agnostic two-stage Consistency Reflection and Correction framework.<n>In the consistency reflection stage, the model is prompted to reflect on the discrepancies between generated responses and dialogue contexts.<n>In the consistency correction stage, the model generates responses that are more consistent with the dialogue context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T11:15:21Z)
• Plug-and-Play Policy Planner for Large Language Model Powered Dialogue Agents [121.46051697742608]
  We introduce a new dialogue policy planning paradigm to strategize dialogue problems with a tunable language model plug-in named PPDPP. Specifically, we develop a novel training framework to facilitate supervised fine-tuning over available human-annotated data. PPDPP consistently and substantially outperforms existing approaches on three different proactive dialogue applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T03:20:16Z)
• Self-Explanation Prompting Improves Dialogue Understanding in Large Language Models [52.24756457516834]
  We propose a novel "Self-Explanation" prompting strategy to enhance the comprehension abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) This task-agnostic approach requires the model to analyze each dialogue utterance before task execution, thereby improving performance across various dialogue-centric tasks. Experimental results from six benchmark datasets confirm that our method consistently outperforms other zero-shot prompts and matches or exceeds the efficacy of few-shot prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T15:41:34Z)
• JoTR: A Joint Transformer and Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dialog Policy Learning [53.83063435640911]
  Dialogue policy learning (DPL) is a crucial component of dialogue modelling. We introduce a novel framework, JoTR, to generate flexible dialogue actions. Unlike traditional methods, JoTR formulates a word-level policy that allows for a more dynamic and adaptable dialogue action generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T03:19:53Z)
• Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems [29.394466123216258]
  This study provides a comprehensive overview of the primary characteristics of a dialogue agent, their corresponding open-domain datasets, and the methods used to benchmark these datasets. We propose UNIT, a UNified dIalogue dataseT constructed from conversations of existing datasets for different dialogue tasks capturing the nuances for each of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T10:05:47Z)
• Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration [72.04629217161656]
  This work focuses on three aspects of proactive dialogue systems: clarification, target-guided, and non-collaborative dialogues. To trigger the proactivity of LLMs, we propose the Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T02:49:35Z)
• FlowEval: A Consensus-Based Dialogue Evaluation Framework Using Segment Act Flows [63.116280145770006]
  We propose segment act, an extension of dialog act from utterance level to segment level, and crowdsource a large-scale dataset for it. To utilize segment act flows, sequences of segment acts, for evaluation, we develop the first consensus-based dialogue evaluation framework, FlowEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T11:37:20Z)
• Coreference Augmentation for Multi-Domain Task-Oriented Dialogue State Tracking [3.34618986084988]
  We propose Coreference Dialogue State Tracker (CDST) that explicitly models the coreference feature. Experimental results on MultiWOZ 2.1 dataset show that the proposed model achieves the state-of-the-art joint goal accuracy of 56.47%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T11:47:29Z)
• Recent Advances and Challenges in Task-oriented Dialog System [63.82055978899631]
  Task-oriented dialog systems are attracting more and more attention in academic and industrial communities. We discuss three critical topics for task-oriented dialog systems: (1) improving data efficiency to facilitate dialog modeling in low-resource settings, (2) modeling multi-turn dynamics for dialog policy learning, and (3) integrating domain knowledge into the dialog model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T01:34:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.