Exploring and Mitigating Fawning Hallucinations in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00869v1
• Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 14:29:54 GMT
• Title: Exploring and Mitigating Fawning Hallucinations in Large Language Models
• Authors: Zixuan Shangguan, Yanjie Dong, Lanjun Wang, Xiaoyi Fan, Victor C. M. Leung, Xiping Hu,
• Abstract summary: We analyze fawning hallucinations in various natural language processing tasks.<n>We tailor the so-termed contrastive decoding method for fawning-hallucination mitigation.
• Score: 52.444712272909435
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in language understanding. However, when LLMs align their outputs with deceptive and/or misleading prompts, the generated responses could deviate from the de facto information. Such observations are known as fawning hallucinations, where the model prioritizes alignment with the input's implied perspective over accuracy and truthfulness. In this work, we analyze fawning hallucinations in various natural language processing tasks and tailor the so-termed contrastive decoding method for fawning-hallucination mitigation. Specifically, we design two paradigms to generate corresponding deceptive and/or misleading inputs for the consistent fawning hallucinations induction. Then, we propose the collaborative contrastive decoding (CCD) to handle the fawning hallucinations across different tasks in LLMs. By contrasting the deviation in output distribution between induced and transformed neutral inputs, the proposed CCD can reduce reliance on deceptive and/or misleading information without requiring additional training. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed CCD can effectively mitigate fawning hallucinations and improve the factuality of the generated responses over various tasks.

Related papers

• Seeing Through the Chain: Mitigate Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models via CoT Compression and Contrastive Preference Optimization [78.94590726578014]
  multimodal reasoning models (MLRMs) remain prone to hallucinations, and effective solutions are still underexplored.<n>We propose C3PO, a training-based mitigation framework comprising textbfCompression and textbfPreference textbfOptimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:00:55Z)
• Counterfactual Probing for Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  We propose Counterfactual Probing, a novel approach for detecting and mitigating hallucinations in large language models.<n>Our method dynamically generates counterfactual statements that appear plausible but contain subtle factual errors, then evaluates the model's sensitivity to these perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T17:29:48Z)
• Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence Associations [82.42811602081692]
  This paper introduces a subsequence association framework to systematically trace and understand hallucinations.<n>Key insight is hallucinations that arise when dominant hallucinatory associations outweigh faithful ones.<n>We propose a tracing algorithm that identifies causal subsequences by analyzing hallucination probabilities across randomized input contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T06:34:45Z)
• Decoupling Contrastive Decoding: Robust Hallucination Mitigation in Multimodal Large Language Models [23.846371966667927]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) generate outputs misaligned with obvious visual or factual evidence.<n>We propose a novel framework: Decoupling Contrastive Decoding (DCD)<n>DCD decouples the learning of positive and negative samples in preference datasets, and trains separate positive and negative image projections within the MLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T02:59:18Z)
• HICD: Hallucination-Inducing via Attention Dispersion for Contrastive Decoding to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Language Models [5.5957864358384795]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate hallucinations, producing outputs that are contextually inaccurate or factually incorrect.<n>We introduce HICD, a novel method designed to induce hallucinations for contrastive decoding to mitigate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T08:17:28Z)
• Mitigating Object Hallucination in MLLMs via Data-augmented Phrase-level Alignment [52.43197107069751]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often generate factually inaccurate information, referred to as hallucination.<n>We introduce Data-augmented Phrase-level Alignment (DPA), a novel loss which can be applied to instruction-tuned off-the-shelf MLLMs to mitigate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T23:36:00Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization [123.54980913741828]
  Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in understanding multimodal data.<n>They invariably suffer from hallucinations, leading to a disconnect between the generated text and the corresponding images.<n>Almost all current visual contrastive decoding methods attempt to mitigate these hallucinations by introducing visual uncertainty information.<n>However, they struggle to precisely induce the hallucinatory tokens, which severely limits their effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:46:31Z)
• Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding [25.489832294197797]
  This paper introduces the Instruction Contrastive Decoding (ICD) method, a novel approach designed to reduce hallucinations during LVLM inference. Our method is inspired by our observation that what we call disturbance instructions significantly exacerbate hallucinations in multimodal fusion modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:04:47Z)
• Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models [109.56911670376932]
  Large language models (LMs) are prone to generate factual errors, which are often called hallucinations. We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations and argue that hallucinations manifest in diverse forms. We propose a novel task of automatic fine-grained hallucination detection and construct a new evaluation benchmark, FavaBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T19:02:48Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information. We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.