Automated Repair of C Programs Using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01947v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 04:34:11 GMT
• Title: Automated Repair of C Programs Using Large Language Models
• Authors: Mahdi Farzandway, Fatemeh Ghassemi,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automating the repair of C programs.<n>We present a framework that integrates spectrum-based fault localization (SBFL), runtime feedback, and Chain-of-Thought-structured prompting into an autonomous repair loop.<n>Our approach achieves 44.93% repair accuracy, representing a 3.61% absolute improvement over strong state-of-the-art APR baselines.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automating the repair of C programs. We present a framework that integrates spectrum-based fault localization (SBFL), runtime feedback, and Chain-of-Thought-structured prompting into an autonomous repair loop. Unlike prior approaches, our method explicitly combines statistical program analysis with LLM reasoning. The iterative repair cycle leverages a structured Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting approach, where the model reasons over failing tests, suspicious code regions, and prior patch outcomes, before generating new candidate patches. The model iteratively changes the code, evaluates the results, and incorporates reasoning from previous attempts into subsequent modifications, reducing repeated errors and clarifying why some bugs remain unresolved. Our evaluation spans 3,902 bugs from the Codeflaws benchmark, where our approach achieves 44.93% repair accuracy, representing a 3.61% absolute improvement over strong state-of-the-art APR baselines such as GPT-4 with CoT. This outcome highlights a practical pathway toward integrating statistical program analysis with generative AI in automated debugging.

Related papers

• TraceCoder: A Trace-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Debugging of LLM-Generated Code [11.207330722400764]
  We present TraceCoder, a framework that emulates the observe-analyze-repair process of human experts.<n>The framework first instruments the code with diagnostic probes to capture fine-grained runtime traces.<n>It then conducts causal analysis on these traces to accurately identify the root cause of the failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T16:59:48Z)
• CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
  Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z)
• ReForm: Reflective Autoformalization with Prospective Bounded Sequence Optimization [73.0780809974414]
  We propose a Reflective Autoformalization method that integrates semantic consistency evaluation into the autoformalization process.<n>This enables the model to iteratively generate formal statements, assess its semantic fidelity, and self-correct identified errors.<n>Experiments show that ReForm achieves an average improvement of 22.6 percentage points over the strongest baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T16:22:54Z)
• RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment [0.0]
  We introduce RePaCA, a novel static APCA technique that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) specialized in thinking tasks.<n>Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance, with 83.1% accuracy and an 84.8% F1-score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T11:21:09Z)
• Refactoring $\neq$ Bug-Inducing: Improving Defect Prediction with Code Change Tactics Analysis [54.361900378970134]
  Just-in-time defect prediction (JIT-DP) aims to predict the likelihood of code changes resulting in software defects at an early stage.<n>Prior research has largely ignored code during both the evaluation and methodology phases, despite its prevalence.<n>We propose Code chAnge Tactics (CAT) analysis to categorize code and its propagation, which improves labeling accuracy in the JIT-Defects4J dataset by 13.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T23:29:25Z)
• Specification-Guided Repair of Arithmetic Errors in Dafny Programs using LLMs [84.30534714651093]
  We present an innovative APR tool for Dafny, a verification-aware programming language.<n>We localize faults through a series of steps, which include using Hoare Logic to determine the state of each statement within the program.<n>We evaluate our approach using DafnyBench, a benchmark of real-world Dafny programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T15:36:12Z)
• Synthetic Code Surgery: Repairing Bugs and Vulnerabilities with LLMs and Synthetic Data [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel methodology for enhancing Automated Program Repair (APR) through synthetic data generation utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The proposed approach addresses this limitation through a two-phase process: a synthetic sample generation followed by a rigorous quality assessment.<n> Experimental evaluation on the VulRepair test set dataset showed statistically significant improvements in Perfect Prediction rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T09:14:20Z)
• Automated Refactoring of Non-Idiomatic Python Code: A Differentiated Replication with LLMs [54.309127753635366]
  We present the results of a replication study in which we investigate GPT-4 effectiveness in recommending and suggesting idiomatic actions.<n>Our findings underscore the potential of LLMs to achieve tasks where, in the past, implementing recommenders based on complex code analyses was required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T15:41:54Z)
• RePair: Automated Program Repair with Process-based Feedback [28.017321930042694]
  We show how small-scale language models (LM) can achieve excellent performance through process supervision and feedback. We develop a reward model that serves as a critic, providing feedback for the fine-tuned LM's action. The results show that process-based not only outperforms larger outcome-based generation methods, but also nearly matches the performance of closed-source commercial large-scale LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T02:53:23Z)
• A Novel Approach for Automatic Program Repair using Round-Trip Translation with Large Language Models [50.86686630756207]
  Research shows that grammatical mistakes in a sentence can be corrected by translating it to another language and back. Current generative models for Automatic Program Repair (APR) are pre-trained on source code and fine-tuned for repair. This paper proposes bypassing the fine-tuning step and using Round-Trip Translation (RTT): translation of code from one programming language to another programming or natural language, and back.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T22:36:31Z)
• RAP-Gen: Retrieval-Augmented Patch Generation with CodeT5 for Automatic Program Repair [75.40584530380589]
  We propose a novel Retrieval-Augmented Patch Generation framework (RAP-Gen) RAP-Gen explicitly leveraging relevant fix patterns retrieved from a list of previous bug-fix pairs. We evaluate RAP-Gen on three benchmarks in two programming languages, including the TFix benchmark in JavaScript, and Code Refinement and Defects4J benchmarks in Java.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T08:52:56Z)
• Is Self-Repair a Silver Bullet for Code Generation? [68.02601393906083]
  Large language models have shown remarkable aptitude in code generation, but still struggle to perform complex tasks. Self-repair -- in which the model debugs and repairs its own code -- has recently become a popular way to boost performance. We analyze Code Llama, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4's ability to perform self-repair on problems taken from HumanEval and APPS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T15:13:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.