Can LLMs Lie? Investigation beyond Hallucination

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03518v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 17:59:45 GMT
• Title: Can LLMs Lie? Investigation beyond Hallucination
• Authors: Haoran Huan, Mihir Prabhudesai, Mengning Wu, Shantanu Jaiswal, Deepak Pathak,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a variety of tasks, but their increasing autonomy in real-world applications raises concerns about their trustworthiness.<n>We investigate the lying behavior of LLMs, differentiating it from hallucinations and testing it in practical scenarios.<n>Our findings contribute to the broader discourse on AI ethics, shedding light on the risks and potential safeguards for deploying LLMs in high-stakes environments.
• Score: 36.16054472249757
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a variety of tasks, but their increasing autonomy in real-world applications raises concerns about their trustworthiness. While hallucinations-unintentional falsehoods-have been widely studied, the phenomenon of lying, where an LLM knowingly generates falsehoods to achieve an ulterior objective, remains underexplored. In this work, we systematically investigate the lying behavior of LLMs, differentiating it from hallucinations and testing it in practical scenarios. Through mechanistic interpretability techniques, we uncover the neural mechanisms underlying deception, employing logit lens analysis, causal interventions, and contrastive activation steering to identify and control deceptive behavior. We study real-world lying scenarios and introduce behavioral steering vectors that enable fine-grained manipulation of lying tendencies. Further, we explore the trade-offs between lying and end-task performance, establishing a Pareto frontier where dishonesty can enhance goal optimization. Our findings contribute to the broader discourse on AI ethics, shedding light on the risks and potential safeguards for deploying LLMs in high-stakes environments. Code and more illustrations are available at https://llm-liar.github.io/

Related papers

• SECA: Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks for Eliciting LLM Hallucinations [47.0190003379175]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains.<n>LLMs often produce hallucinations, raising serious concerns about their reliability.<n>We propose Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks (SECA) to elicit hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T23:44:54Z)
• Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts [79.1081247754018]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely deployed in reasoning, planning, and decision-making tasks.<n>We propose a framework based on Contact Searching Questions(CSQ) to quantify the likelihood of deception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T14:46:35Z)
• MIRAGE-Bench: LLM Agent is Hallucinating and Where to Find Them [52.764019220214344]
  Hallucinations pose critical risks for large language model (LLM)-based agents.<n>We present MIRAGE-Bench, the first unified benchmark for eliciting and evaluating hallucinations in interactive environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:38:29Z)
• Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) present a growing challenge across real-world applications.<n>We propose a prompt-based framework to systematically trigger and quantify hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T14:33:47Z)
• LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query [62.29558761326031]
  Humans have a self-awareness process that allows us to recognize what we don't know when faced with queries. This paper investigates whether Large Language Models can estimate their own hallucination risk before response generation. By a probing estimator, we leverage LLM self-assessment, achieving an average hallucination estimation accuracy of 84.32% at run time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T17:08:52Z)
• Exploring and Evaluating Hallucinations in LLM-Powered Code Generation [14.438161741833687]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) produce outputs that deviate from users' intent, exhibit internal inconsistencies, or misalign with factual knowledge. Existing work mainly focuses on investing the hallucination in the domain of natural language generation. We conduct a thematic analysis of the LLM-generated code to summarize and categorize the hallucinations present in it. We propose HalluCode, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of code LLMs in recognizing hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T07:31:45Z)
• Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models [116.01843550398183]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of downstream tasks. LLMs occasionally generate content that diverges from the user input, contradicts previously generated context, or misaligns with established world knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T16:56:48Z)
• Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are currently at the forefront of intertwining artificial intelligence (AI) systems with human communication and everyday life. This study reveals that such strategies emerged in state-of-the-art LLMs, such as GPT-4, but were non-existent in earlier LLMs. We conduct a series of experiments showing that state-of-the-art LLMs are able to understand and induce false beliefs in other agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T09:27:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.