Improving Narrative Classification and Explanation via Fine Tuned Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04077v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:12:31 GMT
• Title: Improving Narrative Classification and Explanation via Fine Tuned Language Models
• Authors: Rishit Tyagi, Rahul Bouri, Mohit Gupta,
• Abstract summary: This study tackles two key challenges: (1) multi-label classification of narratives and sub-narratives in news articles, and (2) generating concise, evidence-based explanations for dominant narratives.<n>We fine-tune a BERT model with a recall-oriented approach for comprehensive narrative detection, refining predictions using a GPT-4o pipeline for consistency.<n>Our results show that integrating auxiliary knowledge in prompts improves classification accuracy and justification reliability, with applications in media analysis, education, and intelligence gathering.
• Score: 6.310433217813068
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding covert narratives and implicit messaging is essential for analyzing bias and sentiment. Traditional NLP methods struggle with detecting subtle phrasing and hidden agendas. This study tackles two key challenges: (1) multi-label classification of narratives and sub-narratives in news articles, and (2) generating concise, evidence-based explanations for dominant narratives. We fine-tune a BERT model with a recall-oriented approach for comprehensive narrative detection, refining predictions using a GPT-4o pipeline for consistency. For narrative explanation, we propose a ReACT (Reasoning + Acting) framework with semantic retrieval-based few-shot prompting, ensuring grounded and relevant justifications. To enhance factual accuracy and reduce hallucinations, we incorporate a structured taxonomy table as an auxiliary knowledge base. Our results show that integrating auxiliary knowledge in prompts improves classification accuracy and justification reliability, with applications in media analysis, education, and intelligence gathering.

Related papers

• AURORA: Augmented Understanding via Structured Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for Reference Audio-Visual Segmentation [113.75682363364004]
  AURORA is a framework designed to enhance genuine reasoning and language comprehension in reference audio-visual segmentation.<n>AURORA achieves state-of-the-art performance on Ref-AVS benchmarks and generalizes effectively to unreferenced segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T07:47:38Z)
• CL-ISR: A Contrastive Learning and Implicit Stance Reasoning Framework for Misleading Text Detection on Social Media [0.5999777817331317]
  This paper proposes a novel framework - CL-ISR (Contrastive Learning and Implicit Stance Reasoning) to improve the detection accuracy of misleading texts on social media.<n>First, we use the contrastive learning algorithm to improve the model's learning ability of semantic differences between truthful and misleading texts.<n>Second, we introduce the implicit stance reasoning module, to explore the potential stance tendencies in the text and their relationships with related topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:52:28Z)
• Detecting Statements in Text: A Domain-Agnostic Few-Shot Solution [1.3654846342364308]
  State-of-the-art approaches usually involve fine-tuning models on large annotated datasets, which are costly to produce. We propose and release a qualitative and versatile few-shot learning methodology as a common paradigm for any claim-based textual classification task. We illustrate this methodology in the context of three tasks: climate change contrarianism detection, topic/stance classification and depression-relates symptoms detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:03:38Z)
• Blending Reward Functions via Few Expert Demonstrations for Faithful and Accurate Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation [22.38338205905379]
  We leverage reinforcement learning algorithms to overcome the above challenges by introducing a novel reward function. Our reward function combines an accuracy metric and a faithfulness metric to provide a balanced quality judgment of generated responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T02:42:41Z)
• Enhancing Argument Structure Extraction with Efficient Leverage of Contextual Information [79.06082391992545]
  We propose an Efficient Context-aware model (ECASE) that fully exploits contextual information. We introduce a sequence-attention module and distance-weighted similarity loss to aggregate contextual information and argumentative information. Our experiments on five datasets from various domains demonstrate that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T08:47:10Z)
• Conflicts, Villains, Resolutions: Towards models of Narrative Media Framing [19.589945994234075]
  We revisit a widely used conceptualization of framing from the communication sciences which explicitly captures elements of narratives. We adapt an effective annotation paradigm that breaks a complex annotation task into a series of simpler binary questions. We explore automatic multi-label prediction of our frames with supervised and semi-supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T08:50:13Z)
• Context-faithful Prompting for Large Language Models [51.194410884263135]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode parametric knowledge about world facts. Their reliance on parametric knowledge may cause them to overlook contextual cues, leading to incorrect predictions in context-sensitive NLP tasks. We assess and enhance LLMs' contextual faithfulness in two aspects: knowledge conflict and prediction with abstention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:54:58Z)
• Supporting Vision-Language Model Inference with Confounder-pruning Knowledge Prompt [71.77504700496004]
  Vision-language models are pre-trained by aligning image-text pairs in a common space to deal with open-set visual concepts. To boost the transferability of the pre-trained models, recent works adopt fixed or learnable prompts. However, how and what prompts can improve inference performance remains unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T07:51:15Z)
• Distant finetuning with discourse relations for stance classification [55.131676584455306]
  We propose a new method to extract data with silver labels from raw text to finetune a model for stance classification. We also propose a 3-stage training framework where the noisy level in the data used for finetuning decreases over different stages. Our approach ranks 1st among 26 competing teams in the stance classification track of the NLPCC 2021 shared task Argumentative Text Understanding for AI Debater.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T04:24:35Z)
• Temporal Embeddings and Transformer Models for Narrative Text Understanding [72.88083067388155]
  We present two approaches to narrative text understanding for character relationship modelling. The temporal evolution of these relations is described by dynamic word embeddings, that are designed to learn semantic changes over time. A supervised learning approach based on the state-of-the-art transformer model BERT is used instead to detect static relations between characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T14:23:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.