Robust variational neural posterior estimation for simulation-based inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05724v1
• Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 14:10:49 GMT
• Title: Robust variational neural posterior estimation for simulation-based inference
• Authors: Matthew O'Callaghan, Kaisey S. Mandel, Gerry Gilmore,
• Abstract summary: We introduce robust variational neural posterior estimation (RVNP)<n>RVNP addresses the problem of misspecification in amortised simulation-to-reality gap using variational inference and error modelling.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in neural density estimation have enabled powerful simulation-based inference (SBI) methods that can flexibly approximate Bayesian inference for intractable stochastic models. Although these methods have demonstrated reliable posterior estimation when the simulator accurately represents the underlying data generative process (GDP), recent work has shown that they perform poorly in the presence of model misspecification. This poses a significant problem for their use on real-world problems, due to simulators always misrepresenting the true DGP to a certain degree. In this paper, we introduce robust variational neural posterior estimation (RVNP), a method which addresses the problem of misspecification in amortised SBI by bridging the simulation-to-reality gap using variational inference and error modelling. We test RVNP on multiple benchmark tasks, including using real data from astronomy, and show that it can recover robust posterior inference in a data-driven manner without adopting tunable hyperparameters or priors governing the misspecification.

Related papers

• Preconditioned Robust Neural Posterior Estimation for Misspecified Simulators [0.0]
  We study preconditioning under misspecification and propose preconditioned robust neural posterior estimation.<n>We demonstrate that preconditioning combined with robust NPE increases stability and improves accuracy, calibration, and posterior-predictive fit over standard baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T05:32:35Z)
• VIKING: Deep variational inference with stochastic projections [48.946143517489496]
  Variational mean field approximations tend to struggle with contemporary overparametrized deep neural networks.<n>We propose a simple variational family that considers two independent linear subspaces of the parameter space.<n>This allows us to build a fully-correlated approximate posterior reflecting the overparametrization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T15:38:35Z)
• Addressing Misspecification in Simulation-based Inference through Data-driven Calibration [43.811367860375825]
  This work introduces robust posterior estimation(RoPE), a framework that overcomes model misspecification with a small real-world calibration set of ground-truth parameter measurements.<n>Results on four synthetic tasks and two real-world problems with ground-truth labels demonstrate that RoPE outperforms baselines and consistently returns informative and calibrated credible intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T16:04:39Z)
• Preconditioned Neural Posterior Estimation for Likelihood-free Inference [5.651060979874024]
  We show in this paper that the neural posterior estimator (NPE) methods are not guaranteed to be highly accurate, even on problems with low dimension. We propose preconditioned NPE and its sequential version (PSNPE), which uses a short run of ABC to effectively eliminate regions of parameter space that produce large discrepancy between simulations and data. We present comprehensive empirical evidence that this melding of neural and statistical SBI methods improves performance over a range of examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T07:05:38Z)
• A variational neural Bayes framework for inference on intractable posterior distributions [1.0801976288811024]
  Posterior distributions of model parameters are efficiently obtained by feeding observed data into a trained neural network. We show theoretically that our posteriors converge to the true posteriors in Kullback-Leibler divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T20:40:15Z)
• Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settings [53.17563688225137]
  Simulation-based inference ( SBI) is capable of approximating the posterior distribution that relates input parameters to a given observation. In this work, we consider a tall data extension in which multiple observations are available to better infer the parameters of the model. We compare our method to recently proposed competing approaches on various numerical experiments and demonstrate its superiority in terms of numerical stability and computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:23:36Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Robust Neural Posterior Estimation and Statistical Model Criticism [1.5749416770494706]
  We argue that modellers must treat simulators as idealistic representations of the true data generating process. In this work we revisit neural posterior estimation (NPE), a class of algorithms that enable black-box parameter inference in simulation models. We find that the presence of misspecification, in contrast, leads to unreliable inference when NPE is used naively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T20:06:55Z)
• Investigating the Impact of Model Misspecification in Neural Simulation-based Inference [1.933681537640272]
  We study the behaviour of neural SBI algorithms in the presence of various forms of model misspecification. We find that misspecification can have a profoundly deleterious effect on performance. We conclude that new approaches are required to address model misspecification if neural SBI algorithms are to be relied upon to derive accurate conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-05T09:08:16Z)
• Neural Posterior Estimation with Differentiable Simulators [58.720142291102135]
  We present a new method to perform Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) with a differentiable simulator. We demonstrate how gradient information helps constrain the shape of the posterior and improves sample-efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T16:08:04Z)
• Inverting brain grey matter models with likelihood-free inference: a tool for trustable cytoarchitecture measurements [62.997667081978825]
  characterisation of the brain grey matter cytoarchitecture with quantitative sensitivity to soma density and volume remains an unsolved challenge in dMRI. We propose a new forward model, specifically a new system of equations, requiring a few relatively sparse b-shells. We then apply modern tools from Bayesian analysis known as likelihood-free inference (LFI) to invert our proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T09:08:27Z)
• Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
  Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method. A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations. We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.