A Maslow-Inspired Hierarchy of Engagement with AI Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07032v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2025 21:54:21 GMT
• Title: A Maslow-Inspired Hierarchy of Engagement with AI Model
• Authors: Madara Ogot,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Hierarchy of Engagement with AI model, a novel maturity framework inspired by Maslow's hierarchy of needs.<n>The model conceptualises AI adoption as a progression through eight levels, beginning with initial exposure and basic understanding and culminating in ecosystem collaboration and societal impact.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) across industry, government, and education highlights the urgent need for robust frameworks to conceptualise and guide engagement. This paper introduces the Hierarchy of Engagement with AI model, a novel maturity framework inspired by Maslow's hierarchy of needs. The model conceptualises AI adoption as a progression through eight levels, beginning with initial exposure and basic understanding and culminating in ecosystem collaboration and societal impact. Each level integrates technical, organisational, and ethical dimensions, emphasising that AI maturity is not only a matter of infrastructure and capability but also of trust, governance, and responsibility. Initial validation of the model using four diverse case studies (General Motors, the Government of Estonia, the University of Texas System, and the African Union AI Strategy) demonstrate the model's contextual flexibility across various sectors. The model provides scholars with a framework for analysing AI maturity and offers practitioners and policymakers a diagnostic and strategic planning tool to guide responsible and sustainable AI engagement. The proposed model demonstrates that AI maturity progression is multi-dimensional, requiring technological capability, ethical integrity, organisational resilience, and ecosystem collaboration.

Related papers

• Beyond Automation: Rethinking Work, Creativity, and Governance in the Age of Generative AI [0.0]
  generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are reshaping the nature, distribution and meaning of work, creativity, and economic security.<n>This paper investigates four inter-related phenomena in the current AI era: (1) the evolving landscape of employment and the future of work; (2) the diverse patterns of AI adoption across socio-demographic groups, sectors, and geographies; and (3) whether universal basic income (UBI) should become a compulsory policy response to the AI revolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T20:25:24Z)
• Embodied AI: From LLMs to World Models [65.68972714346909]
  Embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an intelligent system paradigm for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)<n>Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) and World Models (WMs) have drawn significant attention for embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T11:37:48Z)
• Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
• What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the Ethos of AI-driven Higher education [0.6216023343793144]
  This study introduces the Human-Driven AI in Higher Education (HD-AIHED) Framework to ensure compliance with UNESCO and OECD ethical standards.<n>The study applies a participatory co-system, Phased Human Intelligence, SWOC analysis, and AI ethical review boards to assess AI readiness and governance strategies for universities and HE institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T11:13:31Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• A call for embodied AI [1.7544885995294304]
  We propose Embodied AI as the next fundamental step in the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence. By broadening the scope of Embodied AI, we introduce a theoretical framework based on cognitive architectures. This framework is aligned with Friston's active inference principle, offering a comprehensive approach to EAI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T09:11:20Z)
• Conceptual Framework for Autonomous Cognitive Entities [0.9285295512807729]
  This paper introduces the Autonomous Cognitive Entity model, a novel framework for a cognitive architecture. The model is designed to harness the capabilities of the latest generative AI technologies, including large language models (LLMs) and multimodal generative models (MMMs) The ACE framework also incorporates mechanisms for handling failures and adapting actions, thereby enhancing the robustness and flexibility of autonomous agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T15:53:55Z)
• Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governance [0.0]
  We present an AI governance framework, which targets organizations that develop and use AI systems. The framework is designed to help organizations deploying AI systems translate ethical AI principles into practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T08:55:27Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.