The Computational Foundations of Collective Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07999v1
• Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 16:02:03 GMT
• Title: The Computational Foundations of Collective Intelligence
• Abstract summary: We show how collective resource advantages lead directly to well-known forms of collective intelligence.<n>Our framework also generates testable predictions about collective capabilities in distributed reasoning.
• Score: 0.761278115791335
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Why do collectives outperform individuals when solving some problems? Fundamentally, collectives have greater computational resources with more sensory information, more memory, more processing capacity, and more ways to act. While greater resources present opportunities, there are also challenges in coordination and cooperation inherent in collectives with distributed, modular structures. Despite these challenges, we show how collective resource advantages lead directly to well-known forms of collective intelligence including the wisdom of the crowd, collective sensing, division of labour, and cultural learning. Our framework also generates testable predictions about collective capabilities in distributed reasoning and context-dependent behavioural switching. Through case studies of animal navigation and decision-making, we demonstrate how collectives leverage their computational resources to solve problems not only more effectively than individuals, but by using qualitatively different problem-solving strategies.

Related papers

• Bridging Talk and Thought: Understanding Dialogue Dynamics Across Collaborative Problem-Solving Contexts [57.79777631004424]
  We present a conceptual framework for analyzing dialogue in collaborative problem-solving contexts.<n>Our framework integrates cognitive and non-cognitive problem solving with metacognitive regulatory mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T16:20:49Z)
• When Models Know More Than They Can Explain: Quantifying Knowledge Transfer in Human-AI Collaboration [79.69935257008467]
  We introduce Knowledge Integration and Transfer Evaluation (KITE), a conceptual and experimental framework for Human-AI knowledge transfer capabilities.<n>We conduct the first large-scale human study (N=118) explicitly designed to measure it.<n>In our two-phase setup, humans first ideate with an AI on problem-solving strategies, then independently implement solutions, isolating model explanations' influence on human understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T20:48:16Z)
• Policy Search, Retrieval, and Composition via Task Similarity in Collaborative Agentic Systems [12.471774408499817]
  Agentic AI aims to create systems that set their own goals, adapt proactively to change, and refine behavior through continuous experience.<n>Recent advances suggest that, when facing multiple and unforeseen tasks, agents could benefit from sharing machine-learned knowledge and reuse policies that have already been fully or partially learned by other agents.<n>This study explores how an agent decides what knowledge to select, from whom, and when and how to integrate it in its own policy in order to accelerate its own learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T20:38:11Z)
• Multi-agent cooperation through learning-aware policy gradients [53.63948041506278]
  Self-interested individuals often fail to cooperate, posing a fundamental challenge for multi-agent learning.<n>We present the first unbiased, higher-derivative-free policy gradient algorithm for learning-aware reinforcement learning.<n>We derive from the iterated prisoner's dilemma a novel explanation for how and when cooperation arises among self-interested learning-aware agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T10:48:42Z)
• Operational Collective Intelligence of Humans and Machines [7.8074313693407635]
  We explore the use of aggregative crowdsourced forecasting (ACF) as a mechanism to help operationalize collective intelligence'' This research asks whether ACF, as a key way to enable Operational Collective Intelligence, could be brought to bear on operational scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T22:45:09Z)
• Private Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Learning: A Survey [50.51431815732716]
  The rise of Artificial Intelligence has revolutionized numerous industries and transformed the way society operates. It is crucial to utilize information in learning processes that are either distributed or owned by different entities. Modern data-driven services have been developed to integrate distributed knowledge entities into their outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:18:23Z)
• A Task-Interdependency Model of Complex Collaboration Towards Human-Centered Crowd Work [0.5439020425818999]
  We present a model centered on interdependencies, a phenomenon well understood to be at the core of collaboration. We use it to explain challenges to scaling complex collaborative work, underscore the importance of expert workers, and explore the relationship between coordination intensity and occupational wages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T22:37:47Z)
• Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration [116.09561564489799]
  Solo Performance Prompting transforms a single LLM into a cognitive synergist by engaging in multi-turn self-collaboration with multiple personas. A cognitive synergist is an intelligent agent that collaboratively combines multiple minds' strengths and knowledge to enhance problem-solving in complex tasks. Our in-depth analysis shows that assigning multiple fine-grained personas in LLMs improves problem-solving abilities compared to using a single or fixed number of personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T14:45:19Z)
• Emergent collective intelligence from massive-agent cooperation and competition [19.75488604218965]
  We study the emergence of artificial collective intelligence through massive-agent reinforcement learning. We propose a new massive-agent reinforcement learning environment, Lux, where dynamic and massive agents in two teams scramble for limited resources and fight off the darkness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-04T13:23:12Z)
• Improved cooperation by balancing exploration and exploitation in intertemporal social dilemma tasks [2.541277269153809]
  We propose a new learning strategy for achieving coordination by incorporating a learning rate that can balance exploration and exploitation. We show that agents that use the simple strategy improve a relatively collective return in a decision task called the intertemporal social dilemma. We also explore the effects of the diversity of learning rates on the population of reinforcement learning agents and show that agents trained in heterogeneous populations develop particularly coordinated policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T08:40:56Z)
• Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning: Challenges and Directions Towards Human-Like Approaches [0.0]
  We present the most common multiagent problem representations and their main challenges. We identify five research areas that address one or more of these challenges. We suggest that, for multiagent reinforcement learning to be successful, future research addresses these challenges with an interdisciplinary approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T19:53:15Z)
• Behavior Priors for Efficient Reinforcement Learning [97.81587970962232]
  We consider how information and architectural constraints can be combined with ideas from the probabilistic modeling literature to learn behavior priors. We discuss how such latent variable formulations connect to related work on hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) and mutual information and curiosity based objectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by applying it to a range of simulated continuous control domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:17:18Z)
• A game-theoretic analysis of networked system control for common-pool resource management using multi-agent reinforcement learning [54.55119659523629]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning has recently shown great promise as an approach to networked system control. Common-pool resources include arable land, fresh water, wetlands, wildlife, fish stock, forests and the atmosphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T14:12:26Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.