Trust Semantics Distillation for Collaborator Selection via Memory-Augmented Agentic AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08151v1
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 21:18:31 GMT
- Title: Trust Semantics Distillation for Collaborator Selection via Memory-Augmented Agentic AI
- Authors: Botao Zhu, Jeslyn Wang, Dusit Niyato, Xianbin Wang,
- Abstract summary: We propose a task-specific trust semantics distillation model based on a large AI model (LAM)-driven teacher-student agent architecture.<n>The proposed 2TSD model can reduce collaborator evaluation time, decrease device resource consumption, and improve the accuracy of collaborator selection.
- Score: 51.4138877170325
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Accurate trustworthiness evaluation of potential collaborating devices is essential for the effective execution of complex computing tasks. This evaluation process involves collecting diverse trust-related data from potential collaborators, including historical performance and available resources, for collaborator selection. However, when each task owner independently assesses all collaborators' trustworthiness, frequent data exchange, complex reasoning, and dynamic situation changes can result in significant overhead and deteriorated trust evaluation. To overcome these challenges, we propose a task-specific trust semantics distillation (2TSD) model based on a large AI model (LAM)-driven teacher-student agent architecture. The teacher agent is deployed on a server with powerful computational capabilities and an augmented memory module dedicated to multidimensional trust-related data collection, task-specific trust semantics extraction, and task-collaborator matching analysis. Upon receiving task-specific requests from device-side student agents, the teacher agent transfers the trust semantics of potential collaborators to the student agents, enabling rapid and accurate collaborator selection. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed 2TSD model can reduce collaborator evaluation time, decrease device resource consumption, and improve the accuracy of collaborator selection.
Related papers
- Completion $\
eq$ Collaboration: Scaling Collaborative Effort with Agents [48.95020665909723]
We argue for a shift from building and assessing task completion agents to developing collaborative agents.<n>We introduce collaborative effort scaling, a framework that captures how an agent's utility grows with increasing user involvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-29T17:47:18Z) - Semantic Chain-of-Trust: Autonomous Trust Orchestration for Collaborator Selection via Hypergraph-Aided Agentic AI [57.58120823855315]
This paper proposes an autonomous trust orchestration method based on a new concept of semantic chain-of-trust.<n>Our technique employs agentic AI and hypergraph to establish and maintain trust relationships among devices.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves resource-efficient trust evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T13:53:25Z) - Chain-of-Trust: A Progressive Trust Evaluation Framework Enabled by Generative AI [20.02079841777494]
Chain-of-trust framework is proposed to make better use of device attribute data.<n>The framework divides the trust evaluation process into chained stages based on task decomposition.<n>generative AI is employed to analyze and interpret the collected data to produce correct evaluation results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-20T16:33:03Z) - Rapid and Continuous Trust Evaluation for Effective Task Collaboration Through Siamese Model [9.467463634233177]
This paper proposes a Siamese-enabled rapid and continuous trust evaluation framework (SRCTE) to facilitate effective task collaboration.<n>A real system is built using two Dell EMC 5200 servers and a Google Pixel 8 to test the effectiveness of the proposed SRCTE framework.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that SRCTE converges rapidly with only a small amount of data and achieves a high anomaly trust detection rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-20T16:30:59Z) - Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [51.452664740963066]
Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments.<n>We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions.<n>Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z) - Decentralized and Lifelong-Adaptive Multi-Agent Collaborative Learning [57.652899266553035]
Decentralized and lifelong-adaptive multi-agent collaborative learning aims to enhance collaboration among multiple agents without a central server.
We propose DeLAMA, a decentralized multi-agent lifelong collaborative learning algorithm with dynamic collaboration graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T09:21:11Z) - Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching [52.79491990823573]
We devise a proxy matching task that allows us to evaluate which kinds of assistive information improve decision makers' performance.
We find that providing black-box model explanations reduces users' accuracy on the matching task.
On the other hand, custom methods that are designed to closely attend to some task-specific desiderata are found to be effective in improving user performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T17:45:20Z) - Behaviour-conditioned policies for cooperative reinforcement learning
tasks [41.74498230885008]
In various real-world tasks, an agent needs to cooperate with unknown partner agent types.
Deep reinforcement learning models can be trained to deliver the required functionality but are known to suffer from sample inefficiency and slow learning.
We suggest a method, where we synthetically produce populations of agents with different behavioural patterns together with ground truth data of their behaviour.
We additionally suggest an agent architecture, which can efficiently use the generated data and gain the meta-learning capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T09:16:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.