[Extended] Ethics in Computer Security Research: A Data-Driven Assessment of the Past, the Present, and the Possible Future

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09351v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:06:56 GMT
• Title: [Extended] Ethics in Computer Security Research: A Data-Driven Assessment of the Past, the Present, and the Possible Future
• Authors: Harshini Sri Ramulu, Helen Schmitt, Bogdan Rerich, Rachel Gonzalez Rodriguez, Tadayoshi Kohno, Yasemin Acar,
• Abstract summary: Researchers in computer security lack clear guidance on how to make, document, and assess ethical decisions.<n>We review all 1154 top-tier security papers published in 2024, finding inconsistent levels of ethics reporting.<n>We report on the results of a semi-structured interview study with 24 computer security and privacy researchers.
• Score: 21.60516344845455
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ethical questions are discussed regularly in computer security. Still, researchers in computer security lack clear guidance on how to make, document, and assess ethical decisions in research when what is morally right or acceptable is not clear-cut. In this work, we give an overview of the discussion of ethical implications in current published work in computer security by reviewing all 1154 top-tier security papers published in 2024, finding inconsistent levels of ethics reporting with a strong focus of reporting institutional or ethics board approval, human subjects protection, and responsible disclosure, and a lack of discussion of balancing harms and benefits. We further report on the results of a semi-structured interview study with 24 computer security and privacy researchers (among whom were also: reviewers, ethics committee members, and/or program chairs) and their ethical decision-making both as authors and during peer review, finding a strong desire for ethical research, but a lack of consistency in considered values, ethical frameworks (if articulated), decision-making, and outcomes. We present an overview of the current state of the discussion of ethics and current de-facto standards in computer security research, and contribute suggestions to improve the state of ethics in computer security research.

Related papers

• Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Review [104.3684024153469]
  Mirror is an agentic framework for AI-assisted ethical review.<n>It integrates ethical reasoning, structured rule interpretation, and multi-agent deliberation within a unified architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:38:55Z)
• Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review [50.18240135317708]
  We discuss newly uncovered cases of identity theft in the scientific peer-review process within artificial intelligence (AI) research.<n>We detail how dishonest researchers exploit the peer-review system by creating fraudulent reviewer profiles to manipulate paper evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T02:36:52Z)
• On the Ethics of Using LLMs for Offensive Security [3.11537581064266]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly evolved over the past few years and are currently evaluated for their efficacy within the domain of offensive cyber-security.<n>This paper analyzes a set of papers that leverage LLMs for offensive security, focusing on how ethical considerations are expressed and justified in their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T11:11:55Z)
• The Only Way is Ethics: A Guide to Ethical Research with Large Language Models [53.316174782223115]
  'LLM Ethics Whitepaper' is an open resource for NLP practitioners and those tasked with evaluating the ethical implications of others' work.<n>Our goal is to translate ethics literature into concrete recommendations and provocations for thinking with clear first steps.<n>'LLM Ethics Whitepaper' distils a thorough literature review into clear Do's and Don'ts, which we present also in this paper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T16:14:43Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [51.85131234265026]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Ethical Hacking and its role in Cybersecurity [0.0]
  This review paper investigates the diverse functions of ethical hacking within modern cybersecurity. It analyzes the progression of ethical hacking techniques, their use in identifying vulnerabilities and conducting penetration tests, and their influence on strengthening organizational security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T11:06:17Z)
• Towards Incorporating Researcher Safety into Information Integrity Research Ethics [2.0305676256390934]
  We argue that researcher protections should be more explicitly considered and acknowledged in internet research studies. We argue that researcher protections should be considered alongside more standard ethical considerations for participants and for broader society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T23:16:12Z)
• A Critical Examination of the Ethics of AI-Mediated Peer Review [0.0]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) systems offer promise and peril for scholarly peer review. Human peer review systems are also fraught with related problems, such as biases, abuses, and a lack of transparency. The legitimacy of AI-driven peer review hinges on the alignment with the scientific ethos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T18:14:10Z)
• Ethical Frameworks and Computer Security Trolley Problems: Foundations for Conversations [14.120888473204907]
  We make and explore connections between moral questions in computer security research and ethics / moral philosophy. We do not seek to define what is morally right or wrong, nor do we argue for one framework over another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T05:39:17Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP [119.53038547411062]
  We study one ethical theory, namely deontological ethics, from the perspective of NLP. In particular, we focus on the generalization principle and the respect for autonomy through informed consent. We provide four case studies to demonstrate how these principles can be used with NLP systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T16:04:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.