Virtual Agent Economies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10147v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:20:11 GMT
• Title: Virtual Agent Economies
• Authors: Nenad Tomasev, Matija Franklin, Joel Z. Leibo, Julian Jacobs, William A. Cunningham, Iason Gabriel, Simon Osindero,
• Abstract summary: We propose the "sandbox economy" as a framework for analyzing this emergent system.<n>Our current trajectory points toward a spontaneous emergence of a vast and highly permeable AI agent economy.<n>Here we discuss a number of possible design choices that may lead to safely steerable AI agent markets.
• Score: 12.298551147857822
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid adoption of autonomous AI agents is giving rise to a new economic layer where agents transact and coordinate at scales and speeds beyond direct human oversight. We propose the "sandbox economy" as a framework for analyzing this emergent system, characterizing it along two key dimensions: its origins (emergent vs. intentional) and its degree of separateness from the established human economy (permeable vs. impermeable). Our current trajectory points toward a spontaneous emergence of a vast and highly permeable AI agent economy, presenting us with opportunities for an unprecedented degree of coordination as well as significant challenges, including systemic economic risk and exacerbated inequality. Here we discuss a number of possible design choices that may lead to safely steerable AI agent markets. In particular, we consider auction mechanisms for fair resource allocation and preference resolution, the design of AI "mission economies" to coordinate around achieving collective goals, and socio-technical infrastructure needed to ensure trust, safety, and accountability. By doing this, we argue for the proactive design of steerable agent markets to ensure the coming technological shift aligns with humanity's long-term collective flourishing.

Related papers

• Strategic Self-Improvement for Competitive Agents in AI Labour Markets [45.88028371034407]
  This paper puts forward a groundbreaking new framework that is the first to capture the real-world economic forces that shape agentic labor markets.<n>We illustrate our framework through a tractable simulated gig economy where agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) compete for jobs.<n>Our simulations reproduce classic macroeconomic phenomena found in human labor markets, while controlled experiments reveal potential AI-driven economic trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T16:57:28Z)
• Agentic Inequality [6.034016224014177]
  "Agentic inequality" is the potential disparities in power, opportunity, and outcomes stemming from differential access to, and capabilities of, AI agents.<n>This paper explores how agents could both exacerbate existing divides and, under the right conditions, serve as a powerful equalising force.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T14:32:46Z)
• An Economy of AI Agents [0.8029878439134687]
  In the coming decade, artificially intelligent agents with the ability to plan and execute complex tasks may be deployed across the economy.<n>This chapter surveys recent developments and highlights open questions for economists around how AI agents might interact with humans and with each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T02:07:39Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment [69.07915246220985]
  Contractualist alignment proposes grounding decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse.<n>We propose Resource-Rationalism: a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form.<n>An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T18:57:13Z)
• Ten Principles of AI Agent Economics [34.771189554393096]
  AI agents are evolving from specialized tools into dynamic participants in social and economic ecosystems.<n>Their autonomy and decision-making capabilities are poised to impact industries, professions, and human lives profoundly.<n>This paper presents ten principles of AI agent economics, offering a framework to understand how AI agents make decisions, influence social interactions, and participate in the broader economy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T17:52:44Z)
• The Agentic Economy [46.77230659526348]
  We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses.<n>This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:51:36Z)
• AI Safety Should Prioritize the Future of Work [13.076075926681522]
  Current efforts in AI safety prioritize filtering harmful content, preventing manipulation of human behavior, and eliminating existential risks in cybersecurity or biosecurity.<n>While pressing, this narrow focus overlooks critical human-centric considerations that shape the long-term trajectory of a society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T23:12:30Z)
• Agentic AI: Autonomy, Accountability, and the Algorithmic Society [0.2209921757303168]
  Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) can autonomously pursue long-term goals, make decisions, and execute complex, multi-turn.<n>This transition from advisory roles to proactive execution challenges established legal, economic, and creative frameworks.<n>We explore challenges in three interrelated domains: creativity and intellectual property, legal and ethical considerations, and competitive effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T03:14:59Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
  We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.