WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13312v3
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 11:47:57 GMT
- Title: WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research
- Authors: Zijian Li, Xin Guan, Bo Zhang, Shen Huang, Houquan Zhou, Shaopeng Lai, Ming Yan, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Jun Zhang, Jingren Zhou,
- Abstract summary: This paper tackles textbfopen-ended deep research (OEDR), a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports.<n>We introduce textbfWebWeaver, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process.<n>Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym.
- Score: 73.58638285105971
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper tackles \textbf{open-ended deep research (OEDR)}, a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports. Current approaches are plagued by dual-fold limitations: static research pipelines that decouple planning from evidence acquisition and monolithic generation paradigms that include redundant, irrelevant evidence, suffering from hallucination issues and low citation accuracy. To address these challenges, we introduce \textbf{WebWeaver}, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process. The planner operates in a dynamic cycle, iteratively interleaving evidence acquisition with outline optimization to produce a comprehensive, citation-grounded outline linking to a memory bank of evidence. The writer then executes a hierarchical retrieval and writing process, composing the report section by section. By performing targeted retrieval of only the necessary evidence from the memory bank via citations for each part, it effectively mitigates long-context issues and citation hallucinations. Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym. These results validate our human-centric, iterative methodology, demonstrating that adaptive planning and focused synthesis are crucial for producing comprehensive, trusted, and well-structured reports.
Related papers
- AgentCPM-Report: Interleaving Drafting and Deepening for Open-Ended Deep Research [85.51475655916026]
AgentCPM-Report is a lightweight yet high-performing local solution composed of a framework that mirrors the human writing process.<n>Our framework uses a Writing As Reasoning Policy (WARP), which enables models to dynamically revise outlines.<n>Experiments on DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearch Gym demonstrate that AgentCPM-Report outperforms leading closed-source systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T09:45:04Z) - DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z) - Unifying Tree Search Algorithm and Reward Design for LLM Reasoning: A Survey [92.71325249013535]
Deliberative tree search is a cornerstone of Large Language Model (LLM) research.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework that deconstructs search algorithms into three core components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T03:29:18Z) - WebResearcher: Unleashing unbounded reasoning capability in Long-Horizon Agents [72.28593628378991]
WebResearcher is an iterative deep-research paradigm that reformulates deep research as a Markov Decision Process.<n>WebResearcher achieves state-of-the-art performance, even surpassing frontier proprietary systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T17:57:17Z) - DIVER: A Multi-Stage Approach for Reasoning-intensive Information Retrieval [36.38599923075882]
DIVER is a retrieval pipeline designed for reasoning-intensive information retrieval.<n>It consists of four components: the document preprocessing stage, the query expansion stage, the retrieval stage and the reranking stage.<n>On the BRIGHT benchmark, DIVER achieves state-of-the-art nDCG@10 scores of 45.8 overall and 28.9 on original queries, consistently outperforming competitive reasoning-aware models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T13:57:49Z) - Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z) - From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents [96.65646344634524]
Large Language Models (LLMs), endowed with reasoning and agentic capabilities, are ushering in a new paradigm termed Agentic Deep Research.<n>We trace the evolution from static web search to interactive, agent-based systems that plan, explore, and learn.<n>We demonstrate that Agentic Deep Research not only significantly outperforms existing approaches, but is also poised to become the dominant paradigm for future information seeking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T17:27:19Z) - WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capability [60.81964498221952]
WebThinker is a deep research agent that empowers large reasoning models to autonomously search the web, navigate web pages, and draft research reports during the reasoning process.<n>It also employs an textbfAutonomous Think-Search-and-Draft strategy, allowing the model to seamlessly interleave reasoning, information gathering, and report writing in real time.<n>Our approach enhances LRM reliability and applicability in complex scenarios, paving the way for more capable and versatile deep research systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-30T16:25:25Z) - DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environments [20.498100965239818]
We introduce DeepResearcher, the first comprehensive framework for end-to-end training of LLM-based deep research agents.<n>Unlike RAG-based approaches that assume all necessary information exists within a fixed corpus, our method trains agents to navigate the noisy, unstructured, and dynamic nature of the open web.<n>Extensive experiments on open-domain research tasks demonstrate that DeepResearcher achieves substantial improvements of up to 28.9 points over prompt engineering-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-04T04:41:28Z) - RAPID: Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Long Text Generation with Writing Planning and Information Discovery [69.41989381702858]
Existing methods, such as direct generation and multi-agent discussion, often struggle with issues like hallucinations, topic incoherence, and significant latency.<n>We propose RAPID, an efficient retrieval-augmented long text generation framework.<n>Our work provides a robust and efficient solution to the challenges of automated long-text generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-02T06:11:29Z) - GEGA: Graph Convolutional Networks and Evidence Retrieval Guided Attention for Enhanced Document-level Relation Extraction [15.246183329778656]
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to extract relations between entities from unstructured document text.
To overcome these challenges, we propose GEGA, a novel model for DocRE.
We evaluate the GEGA model on three widely used benchmark datasets: DocRED, Re-DocRED, and Revisit-DocRED.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-31T07:15:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.