SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16941v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 06:28:17 GMT
• Title: SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
• Authors: Xiang Deng, Jeff Da, Edwin Pan, Yannis Yiming He, Charles Ide, Kanak Garg, Niklas Lauffer, Andrew Park, Nitin Pasari, Chetan Rane, Karmini Sampath, Maya Krishnan, Srivatsa Kundurthy, Sean Hendryx, Zifan Wang, Chen Bo Calvin Zhang, Noah Jacobson, Bing Liu, Brad Kenstler,
• Abstract summary: SWE-Bench Pro builds upon the best practices of SWE-BENCH [25], but is explicitly designed to capture realistic, complex, enterprise-level problems.<n>The benchmark is partitioned into a public set with open access to problems sourced from 11 repositories, a held-out set of 12 repositories and a commercial set of 18 proprietary repositories.<n>In our evaluation of widely used coding models, under a unified scaffold, we observe that their performance on SWE-Bench PRO remains below 25% (Pass@1), with GPT-5 achieving the highest score to date at 23.3%.
• Score: 13.645265361867565
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce SWE-Bench Pro, a substantially more challenging benchmark that builds upon the best practices of SWE-BENCH [25], but is explicitly designed to capture realistic, complex, enterprise-level problems beyond the scope of SWE-BENCH. SWE-BENCH PRO contains 1,865 problems sourced from a diverse set of 41 actively maintained repositories spanning business applications, B2B services, and developer tools. The benchmark is partitioned into a public set with open access to problems sourced from 11 repositories, a held-out set of 12 repositories and a commercial set of 18 proprietary repositories where we have formal partnership agreements with early-stage startups. Problems in the held-out and the commercial set are not publicly accessible, but we release results on the commercial set. Our benchmark features long-horizon tasks that may require hours to days for a professional software engineer to complete, often involving patches across multiple files and substantial code modifications. All tasks are human-verified and augmented with sufficient context to ensure resolvability. In our evaluation of widely used coding models, under a unified scaffold, we observe that their performance on SWE-Bench PRO remains below 25% (Pass@1), with GPT-5 achieving the highest score to date at 23.3%. To better understand these limitations, we cluster the failure modes observed in the collected agent trajectories for a clearer characterization of the error patterns exhibited by current models. Overall, SWE-BENCH PRO provides a contamination-resistant testbed that more faithfully captures the complexity and diversity of real-world software development, advancing the pursuit of truly autonomous software engineering agents at a professional level.

Related papers

• BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing? [61.247730037229815]
  We introduce BeyondSWE, a comprehensive benchmark that broadens existing evaluations along two axes - resolution scope and knowledge scope.<n>To investigate the role of external knowledge, we develop SearchSWE, a framework that integrates deep search with coding abilities.<n>This work offers both a realistic, challenging evaluation benchmark and a flexible framework to advance research toward more capable code agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T17:52:01Z)
• SWE-AGI: Benchmarking Specification-Driven Software Construction with MoonBit in the Era of Autonomous Agents [21.8776989802963]
  SWE-AGI is an open-source benchmark for evaluating end-to-end, specification-driven construction of software systems written in MoonBit.<n>Each task involves implementing 1,000-10,000 lines of core logic, corresponding to weeks or months of engineering effort for an experienced human developer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T06:31:47Z)
• Toward Training Superintelligent Software Agents through Self-Play SWE-RL [66.11447353341926]
  Self-play SWE-RL is a first step toward training paradigms for superintelligent software agents.<n>Our approach takes minimal data assumptions, only requiring access to sandboxed repositories with source code and installed dependencies.<n>Our results, albeit early, suggest a path where agents autonomously gather extensive learning experiences from real-world software repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T00:49:40Z)
• SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarios [6.776894728701934]
  Existing benchmarks for AI coding agents focus on isolated, single-issue tasks such as fixing a bug or implementing a small feature.<n>We introduce SWE-EVO, a benchmark that evaluates agents on a long-horizon software evolution challenge.<n>Tool comprises 48 evolution tasks that require agents to implement multi-step modifications spanning an average of 21 files.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T19:08:15Z)
• NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents [79.29376673236142]
  Existing benchmarks fail to rigorously evaluate the long-horizon capabilities required to build complete software systems.<n>We present NL2Repo Bench, a benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate the long-horizon repository generation ability of coding agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T15:12:13Z)
• Live-SWE-agent: Can Software Engineering Agents Self-Evolve on the Fly? [19.772188613944596]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are reshaping almost all industries, including software engineering.<n>We propose Live-SWE-agent, the first live software agent that can autonomously and continuously evolve itself on-the-fly when solving real-world software problems.<n>Our evaluation on the widely studied SWE-bench Verified benchmark shows that Live-SWE-AGENT can achieve an impressive solve rate of 77.4% without test-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T17:58:18Z)
• SCUBA: Salesforce Computer Use Benchmark [63.66753028386581]
  SCUBA is a benchmark designed to evaluate computer-use agents on customer relationship management ( CRM) within the Salesforce platform.<n> SCUBA contains 300 task instances derived from real user interviews, spanning three primary personas, platform administrators, sales representatives, and service agents.<n>We benchmark a diverse set of agents under both zero-shot and demonstration-augmented settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T16:48:49Z)
• Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling [18.390443362388623]
  Trae Agent is the first agent-based ensemble reasoning approach for repository-level issue resolution.<n>We conduct experiments using three leading large language models (LLMs) on the widely-adopted SWE-bench benchmark.<n>Trae Agent consistently achieves superior performance, with an average improvement of 10.22% over all baselines in terms of Pass@1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T09:37:22Z)
• SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments [2.184775414778289]
  We introduce setupbench, a benchmark that isolates the environment-bootstrap skill.<n>Our tasks span seven language ecosystems, five database engines, and multi-service orchestration scenarios.<n>We find low success rates across task categories, with particular challenges in repository setup (38.9-57.4%) and local database configuration (20.0-53.3%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T22:45:07Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• Automated Benchmark Generation for Repository-Level Coding Tasks [7.305342793164905]
  SetUpAgent is a fully automated system capable of historically accurate dependency setup, test execution, and result parsing.<n>We generate two new datasets: (i) SWEE-Bench an extended version of SWE-Bench encompassing hundreds of repositories, and (ii) SWA-Bench a benchmark focusing on applications rather than libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T17:42:49Z)
• Towards Exception Safety Code Generation with Intermediate Representation Agents Framework [54.03528377384397]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with robust exception handling in generated code, leading to fragile programs that are prone to runtime errors.<n>We propose Seeker, a novel multi-agent framework that enforces exception safety in LLM generated code through an Intermediate Representation (IR) approach.<n>Seeker decomposes exception handling into five specialized agents: Scanner, Detector, Predator, Ranker, and Handler.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:45:45Z)
• SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositories [55.161075901665946]
  Super aims to capture the realistic challenges faced by researchers working with Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) research repositories. Our benchmark comprises three distinct problem sets: 45 end-to-end problems with annotated expert solutions, 152 sub problems derived from the expert set that focus on specific challenges, and 602 automatically generated problems for larger-scale development. We show that state-of-the-art approaches struggle to solve these problems with the best model (GPT-4o) solving only 16.3% of the end-to-end set, and 46.1% of the scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T17:37:48Z)
• Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering Agents [106.87436596397816]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have shown great potential in solving real-world software engineering (SWE) problems. We propose DEI (Diversity Empowered Intelligence), a framework that leverages their unique expertise. Experiments show that a DEI-guided committee of agents is able to surpass the best individual agent's performance by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T17:50:28Z)
• Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents [12.19683999553113]
  We build Agentless -- an agentless approach to automatically solve software development problems. Compared to the verbose and complex setup of agent-based approaches, Agentless employs a simplistic three-phase process of localization, repair, and patch validation. Our results on the popular SWE-bench Lite benchmark show that surprisingly the simplistic Agentless is able to achieve both the highest performance and low cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:24:45Z)
• Alibaba LingmaAgent: Improving Automated Issue Resolution via Comprehensive Repository Exploration [64.19431011897515]
  This paper presents Alibaba LingmaAgent, a novel Automated Software Engineering method designed to comprehensively understand and utilize whole software repositories for issue resolution.<n>Our approach introduces a top-down method to condense critical repository information into a knowledge graph, reducing complexity, and employs a Monte Carlo tree search based strategy.<n>In production deployment and evaluation at Alibaba Cloud, LingmaAgent automatically resolved 16.9% of in-house issues faced by development engineers, and solved 43.3% of problems after manual intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T15:20:06Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study [72.24266814625685]
  We explore the performance of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software development lifecycle with DevEval.<n>DevEval features four programming languages, multiple domains, high-quality data collection, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task.<n> Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.