Bringing Pedagogy into Focus: Evaluating Virtual Teaching Assistants' Question-Answering in Asynchronous Learning Environments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17961v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:15:58 GMT
• Title: Bringing Pedagogy into Focus: Evaluating Virtual Teaching Assistants' Question-Answering in Asynchronous Learning Environments
• Abstract summary: Asynchronous learning environments (ALEs) are widely adopted for formal and informal learning, but timely and personalized support is often limited.<n>Existing assessments often rely on surface-level metrics and lack sufficient grounding in educational theories.<n>We propose an evaluation framework rooted in learning sciences and tailored to asynchronous forum discussions.
• Score: 17.371971971294503
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Asynchronous learning environments (ALEs) are widely adopted for formal and informal learning, but timely and personalized support is often limited. In this context, Virtual Teaching Assistants (VTAs) can potentially reduce the workload of instructors, but rigorous and pedagogically sound evaluation is essential. Existing assessments often rely on surface-level metrics and lack sufficient grounding in educational theories, making it difficult to meaningfully compare the pedagogical effectiveness of different VTA systems. To bridge this gap, we propose an evaluation framework rooted in learning sciences and tailored to asynchronous forum discussions, a common VTA deployment context in ALE. We construct classifiers using expert annotations of VTA responses on a diverse set of forum posts. We evaluate the effectiveness of our classifiers, identifying approaches that improve accuracy as well as challenges that hinder generalization. Our work establishes a foundation for theory-driven evaluation of VTA systems, paving the way for more pedagogically effective AI in education.

Related papers

• Beyond Skepticism: Evaluating LLMs Pedagogical Intent Reasoning with the Adaptive Pedagogical Vigilance Framework [18.26798940982428]
  The capacity of Large Language Models to reason about pedagogical intent within instructional communication remains underexplored.<n>We propose the textbfAdaptive Pedagogical Vigilance (APV) framework, a novel computational formalism.<n>APV formalizes the problem via a Bayesian Pedagogical Intent Inference Engine (PIIE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T01:26:09Z)
• Scaling Equitable Reflection Assessment in Education via Large Language Models and Role-Based Feedback Agents [2.825140278227664]
  Formative feedback is one of the most effective drivers of student learning.<n>In large or low-resource courses, instructors often lack the time, staffing, and bandwidth required to review and respond to every student reflection.<n>This paper presents a theory-grounded system that uses five coordinated role-based LLM agents to score learner reflections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T09:46:21Z)
• UCO: A Multi-Turn Interactive Reinforcement Learning Method for Adaptive Teaching with Large Language Models [59.693733170193944]
  Large language models (LLMs) are shifting from answer providers to intelligent tutors in educational settings.<n>Recent reinforcement learning approaches address this limitation but face two critical challenges.<n>We propose the Unidirectional Cognitive Optimization (UCO) method to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T01:27:02Z)
• Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education [21.37197118335639]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for large language models (LLMs)-driven feedback generation.<n>Our findings suggest that teachers consider that, when aligned with the framework, LLMs can effectively support students.<n>However, we found several limitations, such as its inability to adapt feedback to dynamic classroom contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T03:48:48Z)
• A Large-Scale Real-World Evaluation of LLM-Based Virtual Teaching Assistant [19.026750427901423]
  Virtual Teaching Assistants (VTAs) have the potential to enhance student learning by providing instant feedback and facilitating multi-turn interactions.<n>This study develops an LLM-based VTA and deploys it in an AI programming course with 477 graduate students.<n>We assess the feasibility of deploying VTAs in real-world classrooms and identify key challenges for broader adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T10:59:57Z)
• EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework [9.76455227840645]
  Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as educational tools, yet evaluating their teaching capabilities remains challenging.<n>We introduce EducationQ, a multi-agent dialogue framework that efficiently assesses teaching capabilities through simulated dynamic educational scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T07:48:20Z)
• MathTutorBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Open-ended Pedagogical Capabilities of LLM Tutors [76.1634959528817]
  We present MathTutorBench, an open-source benchmark for holistic tutoring model evaluation.<n>MathTutorBench contains datasets and metrics that broadly cover tutor abilities as defined by learning sciences research in dialog-based teaching.<n>We evaluate a wide set of closed- and open-weight models and find that subject expertise, indicated by solving ability, does not immediately translate to good teaching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T08:43:47Z)
• When LLMs Learn to be Students: The SOEI Framework for Modeling and Evaluating Virtual Student Agents in Educational Interaction [12.070907646464537]
  We propose the SOEI framework for constructing and evaluating personality-aligned Virtual Student Agents (LVSAs) in classroom scenarios.<n>We generate five LVSAs based on Big Five traits through LoRA fine-tuning and expert-informed prompt design.<n>Our results provide: (1) an educationally and psychologically grounded generation pipeline for LLM-based student agents; (2) a hybrid, scalable evaluation framework for behavioral realism; and (3) empirical insights into the pedagogical utility of LVSAs in shaping instructional adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:18:24Z)
• PapagAI:Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays [48.4434976446053]
  We present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system. The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T11:05:51Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Iterative Teacher-Aware Learning [136.05341445369265]
  In human pedagogy, teachers and students can interact adaptively to maximize communication efficiency. We propose a gradient optimization based teacher-aware learner who can incorporate teacher's cooperative intention into the likelihood function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T00:27:47Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.