Towards Robust LiDAR Localization: Deep Learning-based Uncertainty Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18954v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 13:02:44 GMT
• Title: Towards Robust LiDAR Localization: Deep Learning-based Uncertainty Estimation
• Authors: Minoo Dolatabadi, Fardin Ayar, Ehsan Javanmardi, Manabu Tsukada, Mahdi Javanmardi,
• Abstract summary: Iterative Closest Point (ICP) is prone to errors in featureless environments and dynamic scenes, leading to inaccurate pose estimation.<n>We propose a data-driven framework that leverages deep learning to estimate the registration error covariance of ICP before matching.<n>Our method enables seamless integration of ICP within Kalman filtering, enhancing localization accuracy and robustness.
• Score: 1.9268905951820923
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LiDAR-based localization and SLAM often rely on iterative matching algorithms, particularly the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm, to align sensor data with pre-existing maps or previous scans. However, ICP is prone to errors in featureless environments and dynamic scenes, leading to inaccurate pose estimation. Accurately predicting the uncertainty associated with ICP is crucial for robust state estimation but remains challenging, as existing approaches often rely on handcrafted models or simplified assumptions. Moreover, a few deep learning-based methods for localizability estimation either depend on a pre-built map, which may not always be available, or provide a binary classification of localizable versus non-localizable, which fails to properly model uncertainty. In this work, we propose a data-driven framework that leverages deep learning to estimate the registration error covariance of ICP before matching, even in the absence of a reference map. By associating each LiDAR scan with a reliable 6-DoF error covariance estimate, our method enables seamless integration of ICP within Kalman filtering, enhancing localization accuracy and robustness. Extensive experiments on the KITTI dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, showing that it accurately predicts covariance and, when applied to localization using a pre-built map or SLAM, reduces localization errors and improves robustness.

Related papers

• Point-level Uncertainty Evaluation of Mobile Laser Scanning Point Clouds [4.164044593574969]
  This study proposes a machine learning-based framework for point-level uncertainty evaluation.<n>It learns the relationship between local geometric features and point-level errors.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that both models can effectively capture the nonlinear relationships between geometric characteristics and uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T21:30:52Z)
• Neural Error Covariance Estimation for Precise LiDAR Localization [1.8874331450711404]
  We propose a neural network-based framework for predicting localization error covariance in LiDAR map matching.<n>In our evaluation, we achieved a 2 cm improvement in localization accuracy, a significant enhancement in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T14:20:08Z)
• Normalizing Flows for Conformal Regression [0.0]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) algorithms estimate the uncertainty of a prediction model by calibrating its outputs on labeled data. We present a general scheme to localize the intervals by training the calibration process. Unlike the Error Reweighting CP algorithm of Papadopoulos et al. (2008), the framework allows estimating the gap between nominal and empirical conditional validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T15:04:28Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation for Heatmap-based Landmark Localization [4.673063715963989]
  We propose Quantile Binning, a data-driven method to categorise predictions by uncertainty with estimated error bounds. We demonstrate this framework by comparing and contrasting three uncertainty measures. We conclude by illustrating how filtering out gross mispredictions caught in our Quantile Bins significantly improves the proportion of predictions under an acceptable error threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T14:40:44Z)
• Robust Self-Supervised LiDAR Odometry via Representative Structure Discovery and 3D Inherent Error Modeling [67.75095378830694]
  We develop a two-stage odometry estimation network, where we obtain the ego-motion by estimating a set of sub-region transformations. In this paper, we aim to alleviate the influence of unreliable structures in training, inference and mapping phases. Our two-frame odometry outperforms the previous state of the arts by 16%/12% in terms of translational/rotational errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T12:52:27Z)
• Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation [3.5136071950790737]
  Iterative Closest Point (ICP) point cloud registration algorithm is essential for state estimation and sensor fusion purposes. We argue that a major source of error for ICP is in the input data itself, from the sensor noise to the scene geometry. Benefiting from recent developments in deep learning for point clouds, we propose a data-driven approach to learn an error model for ICP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T16:42:04Z)
• PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Network [161.76275845530964]
  Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Network, PDC-Net+, capable of estimating accurate dense correspondences. We develop an architecture and an enhanced training strategy tailored for robust and generalizable uncertainty prediction. Our approach obtains state-of-the-art results on multiple challenging geometric matching and optical flow datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T17:56:41Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Them [161.76275845530964]
  We aim to estimate a dense flow field relating two images, coupled with a robust pixel-wise confidence map. We develop a flexible probabilistic approach that jointly learns the flow prediction and its uncertainty. Our approach obtains state-of-the-art results on challenging geometric matching and optical flow datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-05T18:54:11Z)
• Evaluating probabilistic classifiers: Reliability diagrams and score decompositions revisited [68.8204255655161]
  We introduce the CORP approach, which generates provably statistically Consistent, Optimally binned, and Reproducible reliability diagrams in an automated way. Corpor is based on non-parametric isotonic regression and implemented via the Pool-adjacent-violators (PAV) algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T08:22:26Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural Network [66.26231423824089]
  We propose a method for training a deterministic deep model that can find and reject out of distribution data points at test time with a single forward pass. We scale training in these with a novel loss function and centroid updating scheme and match the accuracy of softmax models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T12:27:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.