Examining the robustness of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to noise for Inverse Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20191v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:48:01 GMT
• Title: Examining the robustness of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to noise for Inverse Problems
• Authors: Aleksandra Jekic, Afroditi Natsaridou, Signe Riemer-Sørensen, Helge Langseth, Odd Erik Gundersen,
• Abstract summary: We compare the performance of PINNs in solving inverse problems with that of a traditional approach using a finite element method combined with a numerical method.<n>We find that while PINNs may require less human effort and specialized knowledge, they are outperformed by the traditional approach.<n>We identify common failures during training to be addressed if the performance of PINNs on noisy inverse problems is to become more competitive.
• Score: 40.54636587324088
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Approximating solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs) is fundamental for the modeling of dynamical systems in science and engineering. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a recent machine learning-based approach, for which many properties and limitations remain unknown. PINNs are widely accepted as inferior to traditional methods for solving PDEs, such as the finite element method, both with regard to computation time and accuracy. However, PINNs are commonly claimed to show promise in solving inverse problems and handling noisy or incomplete data. We compare the performance of PINNs in solving inverse problems with that of a traditional approach using the finite element method combined with a numerical optimizer. The models are tested on a series of increasingly difficult fluid mechanics problems, with and without noise. We find that while PINNs may require less human effort and specialized knowledge, they are outperformed by the traditional approach. However, the difference appears to decrease with higher dimensions and more data. We identify common failures during training to be addressed if the performance of PINNs on noisy inverse problems is to become more competitive.

Related papers

• Physics-informed neural networks to solve inverse problems in unbounded domains [0.0]
  In this work, we develop a methodology for addressing inverse problems in infinite and semi infinite domains.<n>We introduce a novel sampling strategy for the network's training points, using the negative exponential and normal distributions.<n>We show that PINNs provide a more accurate and computationally efficient solution, solving the inverse problem 1,000 times faster and in the same order of magnitude, yet with a lower relative error than PIKANs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T22:44:46Z)
• A physics-informed neural network framework for modeling obstacle-related equations [3.687313790402688]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are an attractive tool for solving partial differential equations based on sparse and noisy data. Here we extend PINNs to solve obstacle-related PDEs which present a great computational challenge. The performance of the proposed PINNs is demonstrated in multiple scenarios for linear and nonlinear PDEs subject to regular and irregular obstacles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T09:22:28Z)
• Mixed formulation of physics-informed neural networks for thermo-mechanically coupled systems and heterogeneous domains [0.0]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a new tool for solving boundary value problems. Recent investigations have shown that when designing loss functions for many engineering problems, using first-order derivatives and combining equations from both strong and weak forms can lead to much better accuracy. In this work, we propose applying the mixed formulation to solve multi-physical problems, specifically a stationary thermo-mechanically coupled system of equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T21:56:59Z)
• Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations [64.78260098263489]
  In this work, we assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve increasingly-complex coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) We show that PINNs eventually fail to produce correct solutions to these benchmarks as their complexity increases. We identify several reasons why this may be the case, including insufficient network capacity, poor conditioning of the ODEs, and high local curvature, as measured by the Laplacian of the PINN loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:01:32Z)
• $Δ$-PINNs: physics-informed neural networks on complex geometries [3.238149275474964]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have demonstrated promise in solving forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations.<n>To date, there is no clear way to inform PINNs about the topology of the domain where the problem is being solved.<n>We propose a novel positional encoding mechanism for PINNs based on the eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T18:03:19Z)
• Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture [77.59766598165551]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are revolutionizing science and engineering practice by bringing together the power of deep learning to bear on scientific computation. Here, we propose Auto-PINN, which employs Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques to PINN design. A comprehensive set of pre-experiments using standard PDE benchmarks allows us to probe the structure-performance relationship in PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T03:24:31Z)
• Revisiting PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics-informed Neural Networks and Point-weighting Method [70.19159220248805]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a deep learning framework for numerically solving partial differential equations (PDEs) We propose the generative adversarial neural network (GA-PINN), which integrates the generative adversarial (GA) mechanism with the structure of PINNs. Inspired from the weighting strategy of the Adaboost method, we then introduce a point-weighting (PW) method to improve the training efficiency of PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-18T06:50:44Z)
• Improved Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Model Ensembles [81.38804205212425]
  We propose to expand the solution interval gradually to make the PINN converge to the correct solution. All ensemble members converge to the same solution in the vicinity of observed data. We show experimentally that the proposed method can improve the accuracy of the found solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:05:34Z)
• Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations [55.406540167010014]
  PINO is the first hybrid approach incorporating data and PDE constraints at different resolutions to learn the operator. The resulting PINO model can accurately approximate the ground-truth solution operator for many popular PDE families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-06T03:41:34Z)
• Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks [55.83255669840384]
  Recent work in scientific machine learning has developed so-called physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. We demonstrate that, while existing PINN methodologies can learn good models for relatively trivial problems, they can easily fail to learn relevant physical phenomena even for simple PDEs. We show that these possible failure modes are not due to the lack of expressivity in the NN architecture, but that the PINN's setup makes the loss landscape very hard to optimize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:06:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.