A Taxonomy of Data Risks in AI and Quantum Computing (QAI) - A Systematic Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20418v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:17:27 GMT
• Title: A Taxonomy of Data Risks in AI and Quantum Computing (QAI) - A Systematic Review
• Abstract summary: This study systematically reviews 67 privacy- and security-related studies to expand understanding of QAI data risks.<n>We propose a taxonomy of 22 key data risks, organised into five categories: governance, risk assessment, control implementation, user considerations, and continuous monitoring.<n>Our findings reveal vulnerabilities unique to QAI and identify gaps in holistic risk assessment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI), the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Quantum Computing (QC), promises transformative advances, including AI-enabled quantum cryptography and quantum-resistant encryption protocols. However, QAI inherits data risks from both AI and QC, creating complex privacy and security vulnerabilities that are not systematically studied. These risks affect the trustworthiness and reliability of AI and QAI systems, making their understanding critical. This study systematically reviews 67 privacy- and security-related studies to expand understanding of QAI data risks. We propose a taxonomy of 22 key data risks, organised into five categories: governance, risk assessment, control implementation, user considerations, and continuous monitoring. Our findings reveal vulnerabilities unique to QAI and identify gaps in holistic risk assessment. This work contributes to trustworthy AI and QAI research and provides a foundation for developing future risk assessment tools.

Related papers

• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AI [38.70363180741332]
  "ForesightSafety Bench" is a safety evaluation framework for cutting-edge AI models.<n>The benchmark has accumulated tens of thousands of structured risk data points and assessment results.<n>Based on this benchmark, we conduct systematic evaluation and in-depth analysis of over twenty mainstream advanced large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T13:12:44Z)
• Toward Quantitative Modeling of Cybersecurity Risks Due to AI Misuse [50.87630846876635]
  We develop nine detailed cyber risk models.<n>Each model decomposes attacks into steps using the MITRE ATT&CK framework.<n>Individual estimates are aggregated through Monte Carlo simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T17:54:17Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Web3 x AI Agents: Landscape, Integrations, and Foundational Challenges [49.69200207497795]
  The convergence of Web3 technologies and AI agents represents a rapidly evolving frontier poised to reshape decentralized ecosystems.<n>This paper presents the first and most comprehensive analysis of the intersection between Web3 and AI agents, examining five critical dimensions: landscape, economics, governance, security, and trust mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T15:44:58Z)
• Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape [42.771086928042315]
  This paper presents an in-depth analysis of frontier AI's impact on cybersecurity.<n>We first define and categorize the marginal risks of frontier AI in cybersecurity.<n>We then systemically analyze the current and future impacts of frontier AI in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T18:25:18Z)
• From Aleatoric to Epistemic: Exploring Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Artificial Intelligence [19.369216778200034]
  Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a critical aspect of artificial intelligence (AI) systems.<n>This review explores the evolution of uncertainty quantification techniques in AI.<n>We examine the diverse applications of UQ across various fields, emphasizing its impact on decision-making, predictive accuracy, and system robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T23:14:47Z)
• Envisioning Responsible Quantum Software Engineering and Quantum Artificial Intelligence [7.827152992676682]
  The convergence of Quantum Computing (QC), Quantum Software Engineering (QSE), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents transformative opportunities across various domains.<n>Existing methodologies inadequately address the ethical, security, and governance challenges arising from this technological shift.<n>We call on the software engineering community to actively shape a future where responsible QSE and QAI are foundational for ethical, accountable, and socially beneficial technological progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T14:26:26Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• AI Potentiality and Awareness: A Position Paper from the Perspective of Human-AI Teaming in Cybersecurity [18.324118502535775]
  We argue that human-AI teaming is worthwhile in cybersecurity. We emphasize the importance of a balanced approach that incorporates AI's computational power with human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T01:20:44Z)
• QB4AIRA: A Question Bank for AI Risk Assessment [19.783485414942284]
  QB4AIRA comprises 293 prioritized questions covering a wide range of AI risk areas. It serves as a valuable resource for stakeholders in assessing and managing AI risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T09:18:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.