Confidence-guided Refinement Reasoning for Zero-shot Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20750v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:15:12 GMT
• Title: Confidence-guided Refinement Reasoning for Zero-shot Question Answering
• Authors: Youwon Jang, Woo Suk Choi, Minjoon Jung, Minsu Lee, Byoung-Tak Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Confidence-guided Refinement Reasoning (C2R) is a novel training-free framework applicable to question-answering tasks across text, image, and video domains.<n>C2R strategically constructs and refines sub-questions and their answers (sub-QAs), deriving a better confidence score for the target answer.
• Score: 19.796455166690187
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We propose Confidence-guided Refinement Reasoning (C2R), a novel training-free framework applicable to question-answering (QA) tasks across text, image, and video domains. C2R strategically constructs and refines sub-questions and their answers (sub-QAs), deriving a better confidence score for the target answer. C2R first curates a subset of sub-QAs to explore diverse reasoning paths, then compares the confidence scores of the resulting answer candidates to select the most reliable final answer. Since C2R relies solely on confidence scores derived from the model itself, it can be seamlessly integrated with various existing QA models, demonstrating consistent performance improvements across diverse models and benchmarks. Furthermore, we provide essential yet underexplored insights into how leveraging sub-QAs affects model behavior, specifically analyzing the impact of both the quantity and quality of sub-QAs on achieving robust and reliable reasoning.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Uncertainty Calibration in Large Language Model Long-Form Question Answering [7.1559850008795385]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are commonly used in Question Answering (QA) settings.<n>Existing UQ approaches remain weakly validated in scientific QA.<n>We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating UQ metrics in reasoning-demanding QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T20:02:34Z)
• PreResQ-R1: Towards Fine-Grained Rank-and-Score Reinforcement Learning for Visual Quality Assessment via Preference-Response Disentangled Policy Optimization [12.993619998545633]
  PreResQ-R1 is a Preference-Response Disentangled Reinforcement Learning framework.<n>It unifies absolute score regression and relative ranking consistency within a single reasoning-driven optimization scheme.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art results across 10 IQA and 5 VQA benchmarks under both SRCC and PLCC metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T16:19:50Z)
• Confidence as a Reward: Transforming LLMs into Reward Models [54.98336080630691]
  Confidence-as-a-Reward (CRew) is a training-free method that utilizes token-level confidence in the model's final answers as a proxy for reward.<n>We show that CRew outperforms existing training-free reward approaches on the MATH500 and RewardMATH benchmarks.<n>We propose CRew-DPO, a training strategy that constructs preference data from confidence scores combined with correctness signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T12:51:47Z)
• Boosting Process-Correct CoT Reasoning by Modeling Solvability of Multiple-Choice QA [10.122669382758122]
  We show that when questions are effectively unsolvable for a model, spurious chains of thought (CoTs) are more likely to appear.<n>We adapt outcome-supervised reward models and reinforcement learning with group-relative advantage to incorporate solvability into their objectives.<n>Our results highlight solvability as a key factor for reducing hallucinations and increasing reliability in CoT reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T08:34:16Z)
• EviNote-RAG: Enhancing RAG Models via Answer-Supportive Evidence Notes [39.61443457073034]
  We introduce EviNote-RAG, a framework that follows a retrieve-note-answer workflow.<n>Instead of reasoning directly over raw external information, the model first produces Supportive-Evidence Notes.<n>EviNote-RAG achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving answer accuracy, training stability, robustness, and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-31T14:44:45Z)
• VQAThinker: Exploring Generalizable and Explainable Video Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning [50.34205095371895]
  Video quality assessment aims to objectively quantify perceptual quality degradation.<n>Existing VQA models suffer from two critical limitations.<n>We propose textbfVQAThinker, a reasoning-based VQA framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T06:16:23Z)
• Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards [67.86091419220816]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show great promise in complex reasoning.<n>A prevalent issue is superficial self-reflection'', where models fail to robustly verify their own outputs.<n>We introduce RISE (Reinforcing Reasoning with Self-Verification), a novel online RL framework designed to tackle this.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T17:59:31Z)
• Collective Reasoning Among LLMs: A Framework for Answer Validation Without Ground Truth [0.0]
  We introduce a new approach in which several advanced large language models produce and answer intricate, doctoral-level probability problems.<n>Our investigation focuses on how agreement among diverse models can signal the reliability of their outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T06:20:52Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Language Modeling for Selective Question Answering [107.47864420630923]
  We present an automatic large language model (LLM) conversion approach that produces uncertainty-aware LLMs. Our approach is model- and data-agnostic, is computationally-efficient, and does not rely on external models or systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T22:47:54Z)
• Improving Visual Question Answering Models through Robustness Analysis and In-Context Learning with a Chain of Basic Questions [70.70725223310401]
  This work proposes a new method that utilizes semantically related questions, referred to as basic questions, acting as noise to evaluate the robustness of VQA models. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed evaluation method effectively analyzes the robustness of VQA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T15:32:35Z)
• Realistic Conversational Question Answering with Answer Selection based on Calibrated Confidence and Uncertainty Measurement [54.55643652781891]
  Conversational Question Answering (ConvQA) models aim at answering a question with its relevant paragraph and previous question-answer pairs that occurred during conversation multiple times. We propose to filter out inaccurate answers in the conversation history based on their estimated confidences and uncertainties from the ConvQA model. We validate our models, Answer Selection-based realistic Conversation Question Answering, on two standard ConvQA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T09:42:07Z)
• Counterfactual Variable Control for Robust and Interpretable Question Answering [57.25261576239862]
  Deep neural network based question answering (QA) models are neither robust nor explainable in many cases. In this paper, we inspect such spurious "capability" of QA models using causal inference. We propose a novel approach called Counterfactual Variable Control (CVC) that explicitly mitigates any shortcut correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T10:09:05Z)
• SRQA: Synthetic Reader for Factoid Question Answering [21.28441702154528]
  We introduce a new model called SRQA, which means Synthetic Reader for Factoid Question Answering. This model enhances the question answering system in the multi-document scenario from three aspects. We perform SRQA on the WebQA dataset, and experiments show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T13:16:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.