The Unanticipated Asymmetry Between Perceptual Optimization and Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20878v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:08:26 GMT
• Title: The Unanticipated Asymmetry Between Perceptual Optimization and Assessment
• Authors: Jiabei Zhang, Qi Wang, Siyu Wu, Du Chen, Tianhe Wu,
• Abstract summary: We show that fidelity metrics that excel in image quality assessment (IQA) are not necessarily effective for perceptual optimization.<n>We also show that discriminator design plays a decisive role in shaping optimization, with patch-level and convolutional architectures providing more faithful detail reconstruction than vanilla or Transformer-based alternatives.
• Score: 15.11427750828098
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Perceptual optimization is primarily driven by the fidelity objective, which enforces both semantic consistency and overall visual realism, while the adversarial objective provides complementary refinement by enhancing perceptual sharpness and fine-grained detail. Despite their central role, the correlation between their effectiveness as optimization objectives and their capability as image quality assessment (IQA) metrics remains underexplored. In this work, we conduct a systematic analysis and reveal an unanticipated asymmetry between perceptual optimization and assessment: fidelity metrics that excel in IQA are not necessarily effective for perceptual optimization, with this misalignment emerging more distinctly under adversarial training. In addition, while discriminators effectively suppress artifacts during optimization, their learned representations offer only limited benefits when reused as backbone initializations for IQA models. Beyond this asymmetry, our findings further demonstrate that discriminator design plays a decisive role in shaping optimization, with patch-level and convolutional architectures providing more faithful detail reconstruction than vanilla or Transformer-based alternatives. These insights advance the understanding of loss function design and its connection to IQA transferability, paving the way for more principled approaches to perceptual optimization.

Related papers

• Perceptual Quality Optimization of Image Super-Resolution [31.948003749760105]
  Single-image super-resolution (SR) has achieved remarkable progress with deep learning, yet most approaches rely on distortion-oriented losses or perceptual priors.<n>We propose an textitEfficient Perceptual Bi-directional Attention Network (Efficient-PBAN) that explicitly optimize SR towards human-preferred quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T01:17:24Z)
• Implicit Neural Representation-Based Continuous Single Image Super Resolution: An Empirical Study [50.15623093332659]
  Implicit neural representation (INR) has become the standard approach for arbitrary-scale image super-resolution (ASSR)<n>We compare existing techniques across diverse settings and present aggregated performance results on multiple image quality metrics.<n>We examine a new loss function that penalizes intensity variations while preserving edges, textures, and finer details during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T07:09:20Z)
• The Personalization Paradox: Semantic Loss vs. Reasoning Gains in Agentic AI Q&A [0.5623023138026949]
  We examined how personalization affects system performance across multiple evaluation dimensions.<n>Results showed a consistent trade-off: personalization reliably improved reasoning quality and grounding.<n>The study demonstrates that personalization produces metric-dependent shifts rather than uniform improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T00:12:41Z)
• Deep Unfolding: Recent Developments, Theory, and Design Guidelines [99.63555420898554]
  This article provides a tutorial-style overview of deep unfolding, a framework that transforms optimization algorithms into structured, trainable ML architectures.<n>We review the foundations of optimization for inference and for learning, introduce four representative design paradigms for deep unfolding, and discuss the distinctive training schemes that arise from their iterative nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T13:16:35Z)
• Unlocking the Essence of Beauty: Advanced Aesthetic Reasoning with Relative-Absolute Policy Optimization [63.169050703903515]
  We propose Aes-R1, a comprehensive aesthetic reasoning framework with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Aes-R1 integrates a pipeline, AesCoT, to construct and filter high-quality chain-of-thought aesthetic reasoning data.<n>Experiments demonstrate that Aes-R1 improves the backbone's average PLCC/SRCC by 47.9%/34.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T04:55:00Z)
• TCPO: Thought-Centric Preference Optimization for Effective Embodied Decision-making [75.29820290660065]
  This paper proposes Thought-Centric Preference Optimization ( TCPO) for effective embodied decision-making.<n>It emphasizes the alignment of the model's intermediate reasoning process, mitigating the problem of model degradation.<n>Experiments in the ALFWorld environment demonstrate an average success rate of 26.67%, achieving a 6% improvement over RL4VLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T11:16:21Z)
• Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage This [62.662640460717476]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can not guarantee convergence to a unique global minimum of the loss when using only local information, such as SGD.<n>We argue that the community should aim at understanding the biases of already existing methods, as well as aim to build new DNNs with the explicit intent of inducing certain properties of the solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T13:33:31Z)
• Tuning for Trustworthiness -- Balancing Performance and Explanation Consistency in Neural Network Optimization [49.567092222782435]
  We introduce the novel concept of XAI consistency, defined as the agreement among different feature attribution methods.<n>We create a multi-objective optimization framework that balances predictive performance with explanation.<n>Our research provides a foundation for future investigations into whether models from the trade-off zone-balancing performance loss and XAI consistency-exhibit greater robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T13:19:14Z)
• On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows [71.92083784393418]
  Agentic AI (systems that autonomously plan and act) are becoming widespread, yet their task success rate on complex tasks remains low.<n>Inference-time alignment relies on three components: sampling, evaluation, and feedback.<n>We introduce Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD), a procedure that repeatedly inserts feedback extracted from different forms of critiques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.