Rescuing double robustness: safe estimation under complete misspecification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22446v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 15:03:18 GMT
• Title: Rescuing double robustness: safe estimation under complete misspecification
• Authors: Lorenzo Testa, Francesca Chiaromonte, Kathryn Roeder,
• Abstract summary: We show that doubly robust estimators may behave fragilely when all nuisance functions are misspecified.<n>We propose a solution based on adaptive correction clipping (ACC)
• Score: 0.7646713951724009
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Double robustness is a major selling point of semiparametric and missing data methodology. Its virtues lie in protection against partial nuisance misspecification and asymptotic semiparametric efficiency under correct nuisance specification. However, in many applications, complete nuisance misspecification should be regarded as the norm (or at the very least the expected default), and thus doubly robust estimators may behave fragilely. In fact, it has been amply verified empirically that these estimators can perform poorly when all nuisance functions are misspecified. Here, we first characterize this phenomenon of double fragility, and then propose a solution based on adaptive correction clipping (ACC). We argue that our ACC proposal is safe, in that it inherits the favorable properties of doubly robust estimators under correct nuisance specification, but its error is guaranteed to be bounded by a convex combination of the individual nuisance model errors, which prevents the instability caused by the compounding product of errors of doubly robust estimators. We also show that our proposal provides valid inference through the parametric bootstrap when nuisances are well-specified. We showcase the efficacy of our ACC estimator both through extensive simulations and by applying it to the analysis of Alzheimer's disease proteomics data.

Related papers

• Adaptive Estimation and Inference in Conditional Moment Models via the Discrepancy Principle [17.447741518678374]
  We study adaptive estimation and inference in ill-posed linear inverse problems defined by conditional moment restrictions.<n>Existing regularized estimators such as Regularized DeepIV (RDIV) require prior knowledge of the smoothness of the nuisance function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T00:23:20Z)
• Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
  This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Principled Input-Output-Conditioned Post-Hoc Uncertainty Estimation for Regression Networks [1.4671424999873808]
  Uncertainty is critical in safety-sensitive applications but is often omitted from off-the-shelf neural networks due to adverse effects on predictive performance.<n>We propose a theoretically grounded framework for post-hoc uncertainty estimation in regression tasks by fitting an auxiliary model to both original inputs and frozen model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T09:13:27Z)
• Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model [2.6900047294457683]
  We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions.<n>Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid mediator density entirely.<n>We show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• Doubly Robust Proximal Causal Learning for Continuous Treatments [56.05592840537398]
  We propose a kernel-based doubly robust causal learning estimator for continuous treatments. We show that its oracle form is a consistent approximation of the influence function. We then provide a comprehensive convergence analysis in terms of the mean square error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T12:18:53Z)
• Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes [52.92110730286403]
  It is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyper parameters, the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically with the input dimension. We also prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:09:33Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• A General Framework for Treatment Effect Estimation in Semi-Supervised and High Dimensional Settings [0.0]
  We develop a family of SS estimators which are more robust and (2) more efficient than their supervised counterparts. We further establish root-n consistency and normality of our SS estimators whenever the propensity score in the model is correctly specified. Our estimators are shown to be semi-parametrically efficient as long as all the nuisance functions are correctly specified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T04:12:44Z)
• Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding [62.40420028973522]
  We study the problem of constructing bounds on the average treatment effect in the presence of unobserved confounding. We propose novel estimators of these bounds that we call "doubly-valid/doubly-sharp" (DVDS) estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T18:55:12Z)
• Orthogonal Statistical Learning [49.55515683387805]
  We provide non-asymptotic excess risk guarantees for statistical learning in a setting where the population risk depends on an unknown nuisance parameter. We show that if the population risk satisfies a condition called Neymanity, the impact of the nuisance estimation error on the excess risk bound achieved by the meta-algorithm is of second order.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-01-25T02:21:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.