We Think, Therefore We Align LLMs to Helpful, Harmless and Honest Before They Go Wrong
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22510v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 15:52:21 GMT
- Title: We Think, Therefore We Align LLMs to Helpful, Harmless and Honest Before They Go Wrong
- Abstract summary: Adaptive Multi-Branch Steering (AMBS) is a two-stage 1-to-N framework for unified and efficient multi-objective alignment.<n>AMBS consistently improves HHH alignment across multiple 7B LLM backbones.
- Score: 19.134202394422285
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) along multiple objectives-helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty (HHH)-is critical for safe and reliable deployment. Prior work has used steering vector-small control signals injected into hidden states-to guide LLM outputs, typically via one-to-one (1-to-1) Transformer decoders. In this setting, optimizing a single alignment objective can inadvertently overwrite representations learned for other objectives, leading to catastrophic forgetting. More recent approaches extend steering vectors via one-to-many (1-to-N) Transformer decoders. While this alleviates catastrophic forgetting, naive multi-branch designs optimize each objective independently, which can cause inference fragmentation-outputs across HHH objectives may become inconsistent. We propose Adaptive Multi-Branch Steering (AMBS), a two-stage 1-to-N framework for unified and efficient multi-objective alignment. In Stage I, post-attention hidden states of the Transformer layer are computed once to form a shared representation. In Stage II, this representation is cloned into parallel branches and steered via a policy-reference mechanism, enabling objective-specific control while maintaining cross-objective consistency. Empirical evaluations on Alpaca, BeaverTails, and TruthfulQA show that AMBS consistently improves HHH alignment across multiple 7B LLM backbones. For example, on DeepSeek-7B, AMBS improves average alignment scores by +32.4% and reduces unsafe outputs by 11.0% compared to a naive 1-to-N baseline, while remaining competitive with state-of-the-art methods.
Related papers
- SeGDeP: Semantic- and Geometric-Aware Decoupled Prompts for Reasoning Segmentation [51.46828526392219]
Reasoning segmentation converts an implicit linguistic conclusion into a precise mask.<n>Existing MLLM-segmenter interfaces either use a special trigger or compress both signals into one context.<n>We present SeGDeP, an explicit what-where interface.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-08T15:11:32Z) - Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization [16.16893757028268]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) enables language models to learn multi-turn interaction with external tools.<n>Existing methods tend to conflate two distinct problems: allocating a fixed rollout budget and translating branch outcomes into token-level credit.<n>We introduce Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization (CBPO), which disentangles these two problems and assigns a dedicated mechanism to each.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-25T09:25:55Z) - Architecture-Dependent Causal Transfer of Activation States Across Large Language Models [51.56484100374058]
Internal language activation states can be transferred causally between different large language models.<n>Injecting projected activations into a target model during generation produces a statistically significant, preregistered causal effect.<n>We conclude that end-to-end activation-state transfer between LLMs, as currently implemented, is architecture-dependent rather than universal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T09:53:27Z) - Activation Steering for Aligned Open-ended Generation without Sacrificing Coherence [16.403654360036498]
misalignment can be triggered by adversarial prompts, benign fine-tuning, emergent misalignment, and goal misgeneralization.<n>Recent evidence suggests that some misalignment behaviors are encoded as linear structure in activation space, making it tractable via steering.<n>These findings motivate activation steering as a lightweight runtime defense that continuously corrects misaligned activations throughout generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T12:28:22Z) - SQL-ASTRA: Alleviating Sparse Feedback in Agentic SQL via Column-Set Matching and Trajectory Aggregation [51.696027315573296]
We propose a framework featuring a universal two-tiered reward mechanism designed to provide effective trajectory-level evaluation and dense step-level signals.<n>In traditional paradigms, rewards are determined solely by the final-turn feedback, which ignores the intermediate process and leads to ambiguous credit evaluation.<n>We show that our approach outperforms SOTA Arctic-Text2-R1-7B on BIRD 2.0 using identical models, propelling Text-to-reward convergence toward a robust multi-turn agent paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T06:26:36Z) - Reward-free Alignment for Conflicting Objectives [12.275610380458119]
We propose a Reward-free Alignment framework for Conflicted Objectives (RACO)<n>RACO directly leverages pairwise preference data and resolves gradient conflicts via a novel clipped variant of conflict-averse gradient descent.<n>We provide convergence guarantees to Pareto-critical points that respect user-specified objective weights, and further show that clipping can strictly improve convergence rate in the two-objective setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T18:59:52Z) - Make Anything Match Your Target: Universal Adversarial Perturbations against Closed-Source MLLMs via Multi-Crop Routed Meta Optimization [49.30177419529011]
We study a more stringent setting, Universal Targeted Transferable Adversarial Attacks (UTTAA)<n>A single perturbation must consistently steer arbitrary inputs toward a specified target across unknown commercial MLLMs.<n>We propose M CRMO-Attack, which stabilizes supervision via Multi-Crop Aggregation with an Attention-Guided Crop.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T17:03:24Z) - One-shot Optimized Steering Vector for Hallucination Mitigation for VLMs [8.089908150148554]
Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on multimodal tasks but still suffer from hallucination and safety-related failures.<n>We propose textbfOSGA (textbfOne-shot textbfSteering with textbfGenerative textbfAnchor), an input-independent framework that improves model performance with a single optimization instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T14:47:59Z) - Trajectory Guard -- A Lightweight, Sequence-Aware Model for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Agentic AI [0.0]
Trajectory Guard is a Siamese Recurrent Autoencoder with a hybrid loss function that jointly learns task-trajectory alignment via contrastive learning and sequential validity via reconstruction.<n>At 32 ms latency, our approach runs 17$-27times$ faster than LLM Judge baselines, enabling real-time safety verification in production deployments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T00:27:11Z) - CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z) - Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards [13.663839318595505]
We seek to answer what it would take to simultaneously align a model across various domains spanning those with verifiable and non-verifiable rewards.<n>We propose a unified framework that standardizes process reward model (PRM) training across both verifiable and non-verifiable settings.<n> Experiments across math reasoning, value alignment, and multi-turn dialogue show that our framework improves performance across multiple objectives simultaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T17:54:15Z) - MEUV: Achieving Fine-Grained Capability Activation in Large Language Models via Mutually Exclusive Unlock Vectors [37.488329455418054]
Large language models (LLMs) enforce safety alignment to reliably refuse malicious requests.<n>But the same blanket safeguards also block legitimate uses in policing, defense, and other high-stakes settings.<n>We introduce Mutually Exclusive Unlock Vectors (MEUV), a lightweight framework that factorizes the monolithic refusal direction into topic-aligned vectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-04T07:16:06Z) - Multi-Prompt Progressive Alignment for Multi-Source Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [73.40696661117408]
We propose a progressive alignment strategy for adapting CLIP to unlabeled downstream task.<n>We name our approach MP2A and test it on three popular UDA benchmarks, namely ImageCLEF, Office-Home, and the most challenging DomainNet.<n> Experiments showcase that MP2A achieves state-of-the-art performance when compared with most recent CLIP-based MS-UDA approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T09:42:42Z) - GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs [56.93583799109029]
GrAInS is an inference-time steering approach that operates across both language-only and vision-language models and tasks.<n>During inference, GrAInS hidden activations at transformer layers guided by token-level attribution signals, and normalizes activations to preserve representational scale.<n>It consistently outperforms both fine-tuning and existing steering baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T02:34:13Z) - Accelerating Diffusion LLMs via Adaptive Parallel Decoding [50.9948753314669]
We introduce adaptive parallel decoding (APD), a novel method that dynamically adjusts the number of tokens sampled in parallel.<n>APD provides markedly higher throughput with minimal quality degradations on downstream benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-31T06:10:10Z) - Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z) - Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs [6.462219916993885]
Alignment in large language models (LLMs) is used to enforce guidelines such as safety.<n>Yet, alignment fails in the face of jailbreak attacks that modify inputs to induce unsafe outputs.<n>We introduce and evaluate a new technique for jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-27T22:13:05Z) - Jacobian Descent for Multi-Objective Optimization [0.6138671548064355]
gradient descent is limited to single-objective optimization.<n>Jacobian descent (JD) iteratively updates parameters using the Jacobian matrix of a vector-valued objective function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T22:06:25Z) - Learning to Learn Better for Video Object Segmentation [94.5753973590207]
We propose a novel framework that emphasizes Learning to Learn Better (LLB) target features for SVOS.
We design the discriminative label generation module (DLGM) and the adaptive fusion module to address these issues.
Our proposed LLB method achieves state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-05T09:10:34Z) - Semi-supervised Domain Adaptive Structure Learning [72.01544419893628]
Semi-supervised domain adaptation (SSDA) is a challenging problem requiring methods to overcome both 1) overfitting towards poorly annotated data and 2) distribution shift across domains.
We introduce an adaptive structure learning method to regularize the cooperation of SSL and DA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-12T06:11:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.