Neighborhood Sampling Does Not Learn the Same Graph Neural Network

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22868v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 19:28:13 GMT
• Title: Neighborhood Sampling Does Not Learn the Same Graph Neural Network
• Authors: Zehao Niu, Mihai Anitescu, Jie Chen,
• Abstract summary: Neighborhood sampling is an important ingredient in the training of large-scale graph neural networks.<n>We study several established neighborhood sampling approaches and the corresponding posterior GP.
• Score: 7.312174450290588
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Neighborhood sampling is an important ingredient in the training of large-scale graph neural networks. It suppresses the exponential growth of the neighborhood size across network layers and maintains feasible memory consumption and time costs. While it becomes a standard implementation in practice, its systemic behaviors are less understood. We conduct a theoretical analysis by using the tool of neural tangent kernels, which characterize the (analogous) training dynamics of neural networks based on their infinitely wide counterparts -- Gaussian processes (GPs). We study several established neighborhood sampling approaches and the corresponding posterior GP. With limited samples, the posteriors are all different, although they converge to the same one as the sample size increases. Moreover, the posterior covariance, which lower-bounds the mean squared prediction error, is uncomparable, aligning with observations that no sampling approach dominates.

Related papers

• Deep learning with missing data [3.829599191332801]
  We propose Pattern Embedded Neural Networks (PENNs), which can be applied in conjunction with any existing imputation technique.<n>In addition to a neural network trained on the imputed data, PENNs pass the vectors of observation indicators through a second neural network to provide a compact representation.<n>The outputs are then combined in a third neural network to produce final predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T18:57:36Z)
• Addressing caveats of neural persistence with deep graph persistence [54.424983583720675]
  We find that the variance of network weights and spatial concentration of large weights are the main factors that impact neural persistence. We propose an extension of the filtration underlying neural persistence to the whole neural network instead of single layers. This yields our deep graph persistence measure, which implicitly incorporates persistent paths through the network and alleviates variance-related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T13:34:11Z)
• Joint Edge-Model Sparse Learning is Provably Efficient for Graph Neural Networks [89.28881869440433]
  This paper provides the first theoretical characterization of joint edge-model sparse learning for graph neural networks (GNNs) It proves analytically that both sampling important nodes and pruning neurons with the lowest-magnitude can reduce the sample complexity and improve convergence without compromising the test accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:54:20Z)
• Gradient Descent in Neural Networks as Sequential Learning in RKBS [63.011641517977644]
  We construct an exact power-series representation of the neural network in a finite neighborhood of the initial weights. We prove that, regardless of width, the training sequence produced by gradient descent can be exactly replicated by regularized sequential learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T03:18:07Z)
• On the Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis of Randomly Pruned Neural Networks [91.3755431537592]
  We study how random pruning of the weights affects a neural network's neural kernel (NTK) In particular, this work establishes an equivalence of the NTKs between a fully-connected neural network and its randomly pruned version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-27T15:22:19Z)
• Why Lottery Ticket Wins? A Theoretical Perspective of Sample Complexity on Pruned Neural Networks [79.74580058178594]
  We analyze the performance of training a pruned neural network by analyzing the geometric structure of the objective function. We show that the convex region near a desirable model with guaranteed generalization enlarges as the neural network model is pruned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T01:11:07Z)
• Towards an Understanding of Benign Overfitting in Neural Networks [104.2956323934544]
  Modern machine learning models often employ a huge number of parameters and are typically optimized to have zero training loss. We examine how these benign overfitting phenomena occur in a two-layer neural network setting. We show that it is possible for the two-layer ReLU network interpolator to achieve a near minimax-optimal learning rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T19:08:53Z)
• Persistent Homology Captures the Generalization of Neural Networks Without A Validation Set [0.0]
  We suggest studying the training of neural networks with Algebraic Topology, specifically Persistent Homology. Using simplicial complex representations of neural networks, we study the PH diagram distance evolution on the neural network learning process. Results show that the PH diagram distance between consecutive neural network states correlates with the validation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T09:17:31Z)
• Multi-Sample Online Learning for Spiking Neural Networks based on Generalized Expectation Maximization [42.125394498649015]
  Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) capture some of the efficiency of biological brains by processing through binary neural dynamic activations. This paper proposes to leverage multiple compartments that sample independent spiking signals while sharing synaptic weights. The key idea is to use these signals to obtain more accurate statistical estimates of the log-likelihood training criterion, as well as of its gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T16:39:42Z)
• Topological Insights into Sparse Neural Networks [16.515620374178535]
  We introduce an approach to understand and compare sparse neural network topologies from the perspective of graph theory. We first propose Neural Network Sparse Topology Distance (NNSTD) to measure the distance between different sparse neural networks. We show that adaptive sparse connectivity can always unveil a plenitude of sparse sub-networks with very different topologies which outperform the dense model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T22:27:21Z)
• Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning via Tensor Methods [53.808840694241]
  We advance the understanding of the relations between the network's architecture and its generalizability from the compression perspective. We propose a series of intuitive, data-dependent and easily-measurable properties that tightly characterize the compressibility and generalizability of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T22:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.