Beyond Outliers: A Study of Optimizers Under Quantization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23500v2
• Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:34:43 GMT
• Title: Beyond Outliers: A Study of Optimizers Under Quantization
• Authors: Georgios Vlassis, Saleh Ashkboos, Alexandra Volkova, Torsten Hoefler, Dan Alistarh,
• Abstract summary: We study impact of choice on model robustness under quantization.<n>We evaluate how model performance degrades when trained with different baselines.<n>We derive scaling laws for quantization-aware training under different parameters.
• Score: 82.75879062804955
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As new optimizers gain traction and model quantization becomes standard for efficient deployment, a key question arises: how does the choice of optimizer affect model performance in the presence of quantization? Despite progress in both areas, systematic evidence on optimizer-quantization interactions remains limited. To fill this gap, we study the impact of optimizer choice on model robustness under quantization, considering both post-training quantization (PTQ), and quantization-aware training (QAT). We first train full-precision models, ranging from 50M to 1.5B parameters, with six optimizers, to explore the hyperparameter landscape, and establish well-tuned baselines. We then apply PTQ to evaluate how model performance degrades when trained with different optimizers. We find that outlier-related metrics, such as the max-to-mean ratio (MMR) and Kurtosis, fail to predict the PTQ performance across different optimizers. We show analytically that this is due to the MMR capturing only isolated layer errors, while ignoring how quantization errors accumulate and propagate through the network. To study the QAT degradation, we train quantized models from scratch and compare them to our original-precision baselines. We find that optimizers performing well in the original pretraining setup may not remain optimal under QAT, and that models trained with Shampoo show the lowest accuracy degradation. Finally, we derive scaling laws for quantization-aware training under different optimizers, showing that Shampoo achieves the highest parameter efficiency of all tested optimizers.

Related papers

• ECO: Quantized Training without Full-Precision Master Weights [58.97082407934466]
  Error-Compensating (ECO) eliminates master weights by applying updates directly to quantized parameters.<n>We show that ECO converges to a constant-radius neighborhood of the optimum, while naive master-weight removal can incur an error that is inversely proportional to the learning rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:35:01Z)
• What Makes Low-Bit Quantization-Aware Training Work for Reasoning LLMs? A Systematic Study [59.44848132298657]
  Post-training quantization (PTQ) usually comes with the cost of large accuracy drops, especially for reasoning tasks under low-bit settings.<n>In this study, we present a systematic empirical study of quantization-aware training (QAT) for reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T11:22:29Z)
• Low-Bit, High-Fidelity: Optimal Transport Quantization for Flow Matching [0.0]
  Flow Matching (FM) generative models offer efficient simulation-free training and deterministic sampling, but their practical deployment is challenged by high-precision parameter requirements.<n>We adapt optimal transport (OT)-based post-training quantization to FM models, minimizing the 2-Wasserstein distance between quantized and original weights, and systematically compare its effectiveness against uniform, piecewise, and logarithmic quantization schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T15:49:36Z)
• Compute-Optimal Quantization-Aware Training [50.98555000360485]
  Quantization-aware training (QAT) is a leading technique for improving the accuracy of quantized neural networks.<n>Previous work has shown that decomposing training into a full-precision (FP) phase followed by a QAT phase yields superior accuracy.<n>We investigate how different QAT durations impact final performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T21:09:54Z)
• End-to-End On-Device Quantization-Aware Training for LLMs at Inference Cost [53.25965863436039]
  Quantization-aware training (QAT) provides a more principled solution, but its reliance on backpropagation incurs prohibitive memory costs.<n>We propose ZeroQAT, a zeroth-order optimization-based QAT framework that supports both weight and activation quantization.<n>Experiments show that ZeroQAT consistently outperforms representative PTQ and QAT baselines while requiring significantly less memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T01:18:27Z)
• PTQAT: A Hybrid Parameter-Efficient Quantization Algorithm for 3D Perception Tasks [9.463776523295303]
  Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) and Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) represent two mainstream model quantization approaches.<n>We propose PTQAT, a novel general hybrid quantization algorithm for the efficient deployment of 3D perception networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T11:55:21Z)
• Can Pre-training Indicators Reliably Predict Fine-tuning Outcomes of LLMs? [42.608899417822656]
  We construct a dataset using 50 1B parameter LLM variants with systematically varied pre-training configurations.<n>We introduce novel unsupervised and supervised proxy metrics derived from pre-training that successfully reduce the relative performance prediction error rate by over 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T21:19:09Z)
• RoSTE: An Efficient Quantization-Aware Supervised Fine-Tuning Approach for Large Language Models [53.571195477043496]
  We propose an algorithm named Rotated Straight-Through-Estimator (RoSTE)<n>RoSTE combines quantization-aware supervised fine-tuning (QA-SFT) with an adaptive rotation strategy to reduce activation outliers.<n>Our findings reveal that the prediction error is directly proportional to the quantization error of the converged weights, which can be effectively managed through an optimized rotation configuration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T06:44:33Z)
• Towards Accurate Post-training Quantization for Reparameterized Models [6.158896686945439]
  Current Post-training Quantization (PTQ) methods often lead to significant accuracy degradation. This is primarily caused by channel-specific and sample-specific outliers. We propose RepAPQ, a novel framework that preserves the accuracy of quantized reparameterization models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T15:42:12Z)
• Zero-Shot Sharpness-Aware Quantization for Pre-trained Language Models [88.80146574509195]
  Quantization is a promising approach for reducing memory overhead and accelerating inference. We propose a novel-aware quantization (ZSAQ) framework for the zero-shot quantization of various PLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T07:09:56Z)
• EfficientDM: Efficient Quantization-Aware Fine-Tuning of Low-Bit Diffusion Models [21.17675493267517]
  Post-training quantization (PTQ) and quantization-aware training (QAT) are two main approaches to compress and accelerate diffusion models. We introduce a data-free and parameter-efficient fine-tuning framework for low-bit diffusion models, dubbed EfficientDM, to achieve QAT-level performance with PTQ-like efficiency. Our method significantly outperforms previous PTQ-based diffusion models while maintaining similar time and data efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T02:51:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.