Conditional Advantage Estimation for Reinforcement Learning in Large Reasoning Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23962v1
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 16:33:07 GMT
- Title: Conditional Advantage Estimation for Reinforcement Learning in Large Reasoning Models
- Authors: Guanxu Chen, Yafu Li, Yuxian Jiang, Chen Qian, Qihan Ren, Jingyi Yang, Yu Cheng, Dongrui Liu, Jing Shao,
- Abstract summary: We introduce Conditional advANtage estimatiON (CANON) to amplify the impact of a target metric without presuming its direction.<n>CANON based on entropy consistently outperforms prior methods on both math reasoning and high-complexity logic tasks.
- Score: 50.84995206660551
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for large language models (LLMs) has achieved remarkable progress in enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities on tasks with clear correctness criteria, such as mathematical reasoning tasks. Several training metrics, such as entropy or response length, have been observed to correlate with different reasoning behaviors in reinforcement learning. Prior approaches incorporate such priors through reward or advantage shaping, which often relies on hand-crafted penalties and preferences (e.g., higher-is-better or lower-is-better). However, without careful hyperparameter tuning, these directional priors can be overly biased and may lead to failure. To this end, we introduce Conditional advANtage estimatiON (CANON), amplifying the impact of the target metric without presuming its direction. Specifically, CANON regroups the sampled responses into two groups based on the higher or lower value of a target metric, measures which metric trend contributes to better performance through inter-group comparison, and identifies the better response within the same group. In summary, CANON based on entropy consistently outperforms prior methods across three LLMs on both math reasoning and high-complexity logic tasks. When applied to response length, CANON further improves token efficiency, yielding a more favorable Pareto frontier in the performance-cost trade-off.
Related papers
- InftyThink+: Effective and Efficient Infinite-Horizon Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [50.185363583880225]
InftyThink+ is an end-to-end reinforcement learning framework for large reasoning models.<n>We show that InftyThink+ improves accuracy by 21% and outperforms conventional long chain-of-thought reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T18:59:27Z) - From Absolute to Relative: Rethinking Reward Shaping in Group-Based Reinforcement Learning [7.6602542594279335]
We propose Reinforcement Learning with Relative Rewards to shift reward shaping from absolute scoring to relative ranking.<n>We show that RLRR yields consistent performance improvements over standard group-based baselines across reasoning benchmarks and open-ended generation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T15:07:06Z) - Outcome-Grounded Advantage Reshaping for Fine-Grained Credit Assignment in Mathematical Reasoning [60.00161035836637]
Group Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as a promising critic-free reinforcement learning paradigm for reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce Outcome-grounded Advantage Reshaping (OAR), a fine-grained credit assignment mechanism that redistributes advantages based on how much each token influences the model's final answer.<n>OAR-G achieves comparable gains with negligible computational overhead, both significantly outperforming a strong GRPO baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T10:48:02Z) - ICPO: Intrinsic Confidence-Driven Group Relative Preference Optimization for Efficient Reinforcement Learning [17.98065634130798]
We propose the Intrinsic Confidence-Driven Group Relative Preference Optimization method (ICPO)<n>ICPO calculates a preference advantage score for each response by comparing the relative generation probabilities of multiple responses under the same input prompt.<n>We have discovered that the preference advantage score not only alleviates the issues of coarse-grained rewards and reward noise but also effectively curbs overconfident errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T03:10:15Z) - Incentivizing Consistent, Effective and Scalable Reasoning Capability in Audio LLMs via Reasoning Process Rewards [24.40159537923851]
We develop a principled method for developing robust and scalable reasoning in Audio Large Language Models.<n>We achieve state-of-the-art results on MMAU Test-mini, substantially outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o Audio, and near-human-level performance on MMSU reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T06:18:10Z) - Walk Before You Run! Concise LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [10.255235456427037]
We propose a simple yet effective two-stage reinforcement learning framework for achieving concise reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The first stage, using more training steps, aims to incentivize the model's reasoning capabilities via Group Relative Policy Optimization.<n>The second stage, using fewer training steps, explicitly enforces conciseness and improves efficiency via Length-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T13:29:51Z) - LARES: Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation [96.26996622771593]
We present LARES, a novel and scalable LAtent REasoning framework for Sequential recommendation.<n>Our proposed approach employs a recurrent architecture that allows flexible expansion of reasoning depth without increasing parameter complexity.<n>Our framework exhibits seamless compatibility with existing advanced models, further improving their recommendation performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T16:22:54Z) - PEAR: Position-Embedding-Agnostic Attention Re-weighting Enhances Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Zero Inference Overhead [24.611413814466978]
Large language models (LLMs) enhanced with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have introduced a new paradigm for web search.
Existing methods to enhance context awareness are often inefficient, incurring time or memory overhead during inference.
We propose Position-Embedding-Agnostic attention Re-weighting (PEAR) which enhances the context awareness of LLMs with zero inference overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-29T15:40:54Z) - Prior Constraints-based Reward Model Training for Aligning Large Language Models [58.33118716810208]
This paper proposes a Prior Constraints-based Reward Model (namely PCRM) training method to mitigate this problem.
PCRM incorporates prior constraints, specifically, length ratio and cosine similarity between outputs of each comparison pair, during reward model training to regulate optimization magnitude and control score margins.
Experimental results demonstrate that PCRM significantly improves alignment performance by effectively constraining reward score scaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T07:49:11Z) - Augmenting Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning with Self-Reference [63.68018737038331]
Humans possess the ability to draw on past experiences explicitly when learning new tasks.
We propose the Self-Reference (SR) approach, an add-on module explicitly designed to leverage historical information.
Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results in terms of Interquartile Mean (IQM) performance and Optimality Gap reduction on the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T09:07:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.