RealUnify: Do Unified Models Truly Benefit from Unification? A Comprehensive Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24897v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:07:28 GMT
• Title: RealUnify: Do Unified Models Truly Benefit from Unification? A Comprehensive Benchmark
• Authors: Yang Shi, Yuhao Dong, Yue Ding, Yuran Wang, Xuanyu Zhu, Sheng Zhou, Wenting Liu, Haochen Tian, Rundong Wang, Huanqian Wang, Zuyan Liu, Bohan Zeng, Ruizhe Chen, Qixun Wang, Zhuoran Zhang, Xinlong Chen, Chengzhuo Tong, Bozhou Li, Chaoyou Fu, Qiang Liu, Haotian Wang, Wenjing Yang, Yuanxing Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Yi-Fan Zhang, Ziwei Liu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce RealUnify, a benchmark designed to evaluate bidirectional capability synergy.<n>RealUnify comprises 1,000 meticulously human-annotated instances spanning 10 categories and 32 subtasks.<n>We find that current unified models still struggle to achieve effective synergy, indicating that architectural unification alone is insufficient.
• Score: 71.3555284685426
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of visual understanding and generation into unified multimodal models represents a significant stride toward general-purpose AI. However, a fundamental question remains unanswered by existing benchmarks: does this architectural unification actually enable synergetic interaction between the constituent capabilities? Existing evaluation paradigms, which primarily assess understanding and generation in isolation, are insufficient for determining whether a unified model can leverage its understanding to enhance its generation, or use generative simulation to facilitate deeper comprehension. To address this critical gap, we introduce RealUnify, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate bidirectional capability synergy. RealUnify comprises 1,000 meticulously human-annotated instances spanning 10 categories and 32 subtasks. It is structured around two core axes: 1) Understanding Enhances Generation, which requires reasoning (e.g., commonsense, logic) to guide image generation, and 2) Generation Enhances Understanding, which necessitates mental simulation or reconstruction (e.g., of transformed or disordered visual inputs) to solve reasoning tasks. A key contribution is our dual-evaluation protocol, which combines direct end-to-end assessment with a diagnostic stepwise evaluation that decomposes tasks into distinct understanding and generation phases. This protocol allows us to precisely discern whether performance bottlenecks stem from deficiencies in core abilities or from a failure to integrate them. Through large-scale evaluations of 12 leading unified models and 6 specialized baselines, we find that current unified models still struggle to achieve effective synergy, indicating that architectural unification alone is insufficient. These results highlight the need for new training strategies and inductive biases to fully unlock the potential of unified modeling.

Related papers

• UniG2U-Bench: Do Unified Models Advance Multimodal Understanding? [50.92401586025528]
  Unified multimodal models have recently demonstrated strong generative capabilities, yet whether and when generation improves understanding remains unclear.<n>We introduce UniG2U-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark categorizing generation-to-understanding (G2U) evaluation into 7 regimes and 30 subtasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:36:16Z)
• Can Unified Generation and Understanding Models Maintain Semantic Equivalence Across Different Output Modalities? [61.533560295383786]
  Unified Multimodal Large Language Models (U-MLLMs) integrate understanding and generation within a single architecture.<n>We observe that U-MLLMs fail to maintain semantic equivalence when required to render the same results in the image modality.<n>We introduce VGUBench, a framework to decouple reasoning logic from generation fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T06:23:56Z)
• Understanding Degradation with Vision Language Model [56.09241449206817]
  Understanding visual degradations is a critical yet challenging problem in computer vision.<n>We introduce DU-VLM, a multimodal chain-of-thought model trained with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.<n>We also introduce textbfDU-110k, a large-scale dataset comprising 110,000 clean-degraded pairs with grounded physical annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T13:51:15Z)
• Endogenous Reprompting: Self-Evolving Cognitive Alignment for Unified Multimodal Models [23.128973540926552]
  Endogenous Reprompting transforms the model's understanding into an explicit generative reasoning step.<n>We show that SEER consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in evaluation accuracy, reprompting efficiency, and generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T06:54:36Z)
• Uni-MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Unified Benchmark [69.8473923357969]
  Unified multimodal models aim to jointly enable visual understanding and generation, yet current benchmarks rarely examine their true integration.<n>We present Uni-MMMU, a comprehensive benchmark that unfolds the bidirectional synergy between generation and understanding across eight reasoning-centric domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T17:10:35Z)
• Arg-LLaDA: Argument Summarization via Large Language Diffusion Models and Sufficiency-Aware Refinement [27.673022970833163]
  We introduce Arg-LLaDA, a novel large language diffusion framework that iteratively improves summaries.<n>Our method combines a flexible masking controller with a sufficiency-checking module to identify and revise unsupported, redundant, or incomplete spans.<n> Empirical results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that Arg-LLaDA surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in 7 out of 10 automatic evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T09:07:52Z)
• Turning Internal Gap into Self-Improvement: Promoting the Generation-Understanding Unification in MLLMs [46.43090277452948]
  We show that unified MLLMs exhibit an internal gap with understanding outperforming generation.<n>This finding motivates us to propose a simple yet effective internal gap-based self-improvement framework.<n>We empirically discover a co-improvement effect of such self-improvement, a phenomenon well known in pre-training but underexplored in post-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T14:56:39Z)
• Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
  We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z)
• How Far Are We from Generating Missing Modalities with Foundation Models? [49.425856207329524]
  We propose an agentic framework tailored for missing modality reconstruction.<n>Our method reduces FID for missing image reconstruction by at least 14% and MER for missing text reconstruction by at least 10% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T03:22:44Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• Unifying Self-Supervised Clustering and Energy-Based Models [9.3176264568834]
  We establish a principled connection between self-supervised learning and generative models.<n>We show that our solution can be integrated into a neuro-symbolic framework to tackle a simple yet non-trivial instantiation of the symbol grounding problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T04:46:16Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.