'Too much alignment; not enough culture': Re-balancing cultural alignment practices in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26167v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 12:22:53 GMT
• Title: 'Too much alignment; not enough culture': Re-balancing cultural alignment practices in LLMs
• Authors: Eric J. W. Orlowski, Hakim Norhashim, Tristan Koh Ly Wey,
• Abstract summary: This paper argues for a shift towards integrating qualitative approaches into AI alignment practices.<n> Drawing inspiration from Clifford Geertz's concept of "thick description," we propose that AI systems must produce outputs that reflect deeper cultural meanings.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While cultural alignment has increasingly become a focal point within AI research, current approaches relying predominantly on quantitative benchmarks and simplistic proxies fail to capture the deeply nuanced and context-dependent nature of human cultures. Existing alignment practices typically reduce culture to static demographic categories or superficial cultural facts, thereby sidestepping critical questions about what it truly means to be culturally aligned. This paper argues for a fundamental shift towards integrating interpretive qualitative approaches drawn from social sciences into AI alignment practices, specifically in the context of Large Language Models (LLMs). Drawing inspiration from Clifford Geertz's concept of "thick description," we propose that AI systems must produce outputs that reflect deeper cultural meanings--what we term "thick outputs"-grounded firmly in user-provided context and intent. We outline three necessary conditions for successful cultural alignment: sufficiently scoped cultural representations, the capacity for nuanced outputs, and the anchoring of outputs in the cultural contexts implied within prompts. Finally, we call for cross-disciplinary collaboration and the adoption of qualitative, ethnographic evaluation methods as vital steps toward developing AI systems that are genuinely culturally sensitive, ethically responsible, and reflective of human complexity.

Related papers

• Mind the Gap in Cultural Alignment: Task-Aware Culture Management for Large Language Models [78.19037585302475]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in culturally sensitive real-world tasks.<n>Existing cultural alignment approaches fail to align LLMs' broad cultural values with the specific goals of downstream tasks.<n>We propose CultureManager, a novel pipeline for task-specific cultural alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T23:27:18Z)
• CALM: Culturally Self-Aware Language Models [22.309957211042597]
  CALM is a novel framework designed to endow language models with cultural self-awareness.<n>It disentangles task semantics from explicit cultural concepts and latent cultural signals.<n>The resulting unified representation is fused with the model's original knowledge to construct a culturally grounded internal identity state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T00:28:33Z)
• CURE: Cultural Understanding and Reasoning Evaluation - A Framework for "Thick" Culture Alignment Evaluation in LLMs [24.598338950728234]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in culturally diverse environments.<n>Existing methods focus on de-contextualized correctness or forced-choice judgments.<n>We introduce a set of benchmarks that present models with realistic situational contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T03:39:13Z)
• CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs [57.653830744706305]
  CultureScope is the most comprehensive evaluation framework to date for assessing cultural understanding in large language models.<n>Inspired by the cultural iceberg theory, we design a novel dimensional schema for cultural knowledge classification.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively evaluate cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T17:47:48Z)
• Culture is Everywhere: A Call for Intentionally Cultural Evaluation [36.20861746863831]
  We argue for textbfintentionally cultural evaluation: an approach that systematically examines the cultural assumptions embedded in all aspects of evaluation.<n>We discuss implications and future directions for moving beyond current benchmarking practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T09:39:21Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias via Word Association Test [48.623761108859085]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To mitigate the culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach that integrates a culture-aware steering mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• CultureVLM: Characterizing and Improving Cultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models for over 100 Countries [63.00147630084146]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced human-AI interaction but struggle with cultural understanding.<n>CultureVerse is a large-scale multimodal benchmark covering 19, 682 cultural concepts, 188 countries/regions, 15 cultural concepts, and 3 question types.<n>We propose CultureVLM, a series of VLMs fine-tuned on our dataset to achieve significant performance improvement in cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T14:42:37Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.