How does the optimizer implicitly bias the model merging loss landscape?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04686v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 10:56:41 GMT
• Title: How does the optimizer implicitly bias the model merging loss landscape?
• Authors: Chenxiang Zhang, Alexander Theus, Damien Teney, Antonio Orvieto, Jun Pang, Sjouke Mauw,
• Abstract summary: We show that a single quantity -- the effective noise scale -- unifies the impact of inference and data choices on model merging.<n>Across datasets, the effectiveness of merging success is a non-monotonic function of effective noise, with a distinct optimum.
• Score: 66.96572894292895
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Model merging methods combine models with different capabilities into a single one while maintaining the same inference cost. Two popular approaches are linear interpolation, which linearly interpolates between model weights, and task arithmetic, which combines task vectors obtained by the difference between finetuned and base models. While useful in practice, what properties make merging effective are poorly understood. This paper explores how the optimization process affects the loss landscape geometry and its impact on merging success. We show that a single quantity -- the effective noise scale -- unifies the impact of optimizer and data choices on model merging. Across architectures and datasets, the effectiveness of merging success is a non-monotonic function of effective noise, with a distinct optimum. Decomposing this quantity, we find that larger learning rates, stronger weight decay, smaller batch sizes, and data augmentation all independently modulate the effective noise scale, exhibiting the same qualitative trend. Unlike prior work that connects optimizer noise to the flatness or generalization of individual minima, we show that it also affects the global loss landscape, predicting when independently trained solutions can be merged. Our findings broaden the understanding of how optimization shapes the loss landscape geometry and its downstream consequences for model merging, suggesting the possibility of further manipulating the training dynamics to improve merging effectiveness.

Related papers

• LLM-Inspired Pretrain-Then-Finetune for Small-Data, Large-Scale Optimization [7.8639568562295965]
  We consider small-data, large-scale decision problems in which a firm must make many operational decisions simultaneously.<n>We propose a pretrain-then-finetune approach built on a designed Transformer model to address this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T16:08:33Z)
• On Joint Regularization and Calibration in Deep Ensembles [4.042929081555184]
  Deep ensembles are a powerful tool in machine learning, improving both model performance and uncertainty calibration.<n>This paper investigates the impact of jointly tuning weight decay, temperature scaling, and early stopping on both predictive performance and uncertainty quantification.<n>We highlight the trade-offs between individual and joint optimization in deep ensemble training, with the overlapping holdout strategy offering an attractive practical solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T08:04:19Z)
• Nonparametric Data Attribution for Diffusion Models [57.820618036556084]
  Data attribution for generative models seeks to quantify the influence of individual training examples on model outputs.<n>We propose a nonparametric attribution method that operates entirely on data, measuring influence via patch-level similarity between generated and training images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T03:37:16Z)
• Dynamic Fisher-weighted Model Merging via Bayesian Optimization [37.02810891820468]
  Existing merging approaches typically involve scaling the parameters model-wise or integrating parameter importance parameter-wise.<n>We unify these strategies into a more general merging framework, and introduce Dynamic Fisher-weighted Merging (DF-Merge)<n>We show that DF-Merge outperforms strong baselines across models of different sizes and a variety of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-26T18:31:14Z)
• Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descent [72.10987117380584]
  Merging multiple expert models offers a promising approach for performing multi-task learning without accessing their original data.<n>We find existing methods discard task-specific information that, while causing conflicts, is crucial for performance.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving state-of-the-art results across diverse architectures and tasks in both vision and NLP domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T12:45:21Z)
• Improved Distribution Matching for Dataset Condensation [91.55972945798531]
  We propose a novel dataset condensation method based on distribution matching. Our simple yet effective method outperforms most previous optimization-oriented methods with much fewer computational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T04:07:33Z)
• Joint Training of Deep Ensembles Fails Due to Learner Collusion [61.557412796012535]
  Ensembles of machine learning models have been well established as a powerful method of improving performance over a single model. Traditionally, ensembling algorithms train their base learners independently or sequentially with the goal of optimizing their joint performance. We show that directly minimizing the loss of the ensemble appears to rarely be applied in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T18:58:07Z)
• Learning Distributionally Robust Models at Scale via Composite Optimization [45.47760229170775]
  We show how different variants of DRO are simply instances of a finite-sum composite optimization for which we provide scalable methods. We also provide empirical results that demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm with respect to the prior art in order to learn robust models from very large datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T20:47:42Z)
• Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuning [94.35586521144117]
  We investigate whether applying contrastive learning to fine-tuning would bring further benefits. We propose Contrast-regularized tuning (Core-tuning), a novel approach for fine-tuning contrastive self-supervised visual models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T16:31:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.