A New Digital Divide? Coder Worldviews, the Slop Economy, and Democracy in the Age of AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04755v3
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 04:53:32 GMT
• Title: A New Digital Divide? Coder Worldviews, the Slop Economy, and Democracy in the Age of AI
• Authors: Jason Miklian, Kristian Hoelscher,
• Abstract summary: We present an original survey of software developers in Silicon Valley.<n>Results indicate that most developers recognize the power of their products to influence civil liberties and political discourse.<n>We investigate these findings in the context of an emerging new digital divide, not of internet access but of information quality.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Digital technologies are transforming democratic life in conflicting ways. This article bridges two perspectives to unpack these tensions. First, we present an original survey of software developers in Silicon Valley, interrogating how coder worldviews, ethics, and workplace cultures shape the democratic potential and social impact of the technologies they build. Results indicate that while most developers recognize the power of their products to influence civil liberties and political discourse, they often face ethical dilemmas and top-down pressures that can lead to design choices undermining democratic ideals. Second, we critically investigate these findings in the context of an emerging new digital divide, not of internet access but of information quality. We interrogate the survey findings in the context of the Slop Economy, in which billions of users unable to pay for high-quality content experience an internet dominated by low-quality, AI-generated ad-driven content. We find a reinforcing cycle between tech creator beliefs and the digital ecosystems they spawn. We discuss implications for democratic governance, arguing for more ethically informed design and policy interventions to help bridge the digital divide to ensure that technological innovation supports rather than subverts democratic values in the next chapter of the digital age.

Related papers

• User Negotiations of Authenticity, Ownership, and Governance on AI-Generated Video Platforms: Evidence from Sora [3.6795902817860693]
  This study examines how users make sense of AI-generated videos on OpenAI's Sora.<n>We identify four dynamics that characterize how users negotiate authenticity, authorship, and platform governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T08:23:27Z)
• Can Media Act as a Soft Regulator of Safe AI Development? A Game Theoretical Analysis [57.68073583427415]
  We study whether media coverage has the potential to push AI creators into the production of safe products.<n>Our results reveal that media is indeed able to foster cooperation between creators and users, but not always.<n>By shaping public perception and holding developers accountable, media emerges as a powerful soft regulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T12:13:34Z)
• Digital Democracy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [0.16385815610837165]
  This chapter explores the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on digital democracy.<n>It focuses on four main areas: citizenship, participation, representation, and the public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T10:20:53Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• How will advanced AI systems impact democracy? [16.944248678780614]
  We discuss the impacts that generative artificial intelligence may have on democratic processes. We ask how AI might be used to destabilise or support democratic mechanisms like elections. Finally, we discuss whether AI will strengthen or weaken democratic principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T12:05:59Z)
• Can Artificial Intelligence Embody Moral Values? [0.0]
  neutrality thesis holds that technology cannot be laden with values. In this paper, we argue that artificial intelligence, particularly artificial agents that autonomously make decisions to pursue their goals, challenge the neutrality thesis. Our central claim is that the computational models underlying artificial agents can integrate representations of moral values such as fairness, honesty and avoiding harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T09:39:16Z)
• Prioritising Response-able IP Practices in Digitization of Electoral Processes in Africa [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between intellectual property (IP) practices and the adoption of digital technologies used in democratic electoral processes. Because of the hard boundaries associated with IP it creates an environment where the systems are controlled solely by technology IP owners. This questions the response-ability and trust-ability of digital technologies in running democratic processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T11:07:09Z)
• Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy [68.02254954746476]
  This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. It arose from the Lorentz Center Workshop on Algorithmic Technology for Democracy'' (Leiden, October 2022)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T10:12:49Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
  We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
• A Framework for Democratizing AI [0.0]
  Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence are an integral part of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. De democratizing AI is a multi-faceted problem, and it requires advancements in science, technology and policy. We introduce an opinionated, textttmlsquare framework that provides a single point of interface to a variety of solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:30:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.