Distribution Preference Optimization: A Fine-grained Perspective for LLM Unlearning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04773v1
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:49:00 GMT
- Title: Distribution Preference Optimization: A Fine-grained Perspective for LLM Unlearning
- Authors: Kai Qin, Jiaqi Wu, Jianxiang He, Haoyuan Sun, Yifei Zhao, Bin Liang, Yongzhe Chang, Tiantian Zhang, Houde Liu,
- Abstract summary: Unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific data while preserving overall model utility, is becoming an important research area.<n>We derive a novel unlearning algorithm termed textbfDistribution textbfPreference textbfOptimization (DiPO)<n>DiPO attains the highest forget quality on the TOFU benchmark, and maintains leading scalability and sustainability on the MUSE benchmark.
- Score: 26.120338506874976
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities learned from vast corpora, concerns regarding data privacy and safety are receiving increasing attention. LLM unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific data while preserving overall model utility, is becoming an important research area. One of the mainstream unlearning classes is optimization-based methods, which achieve forgetting directly through fine-tuning, exemplified by Negative Preference Optimization (NPO). However, NPO's effectiveness is limited by its inherent lack of explicit positive preference signals. Attempts to introduce such signals by constructing preferred responses often necessitate domain-specific knowledge or well-designed prompts, fundamentally restricting their generalizability. In this paper, we shift the focus to the distribution-level, directly targeting the next-token probability distribution instead of entire responses, and derive a novel unlearning algorithm termed \textbf{Di}stribution \textbf{P}reference \textbf{O}ptimization (DiPO). We show that the requisite preference distribution pairs for DiPO, which are distributions over the model's output tokens, can be constructed by selectively amplifying or suppressing the model's high-confidence output logits, thereby effectively overcoming NPO's limitations. We theoretically prove the consistency of DiPO's loss function with the desired unlearning direction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DiPO achieves a strong trade-off between model utility and forget quality. Notably, DiPO attains the highest forget quality on the TOFU benchmark, and maintains leading scalability and sustainability in utility preservation on the MUSE benchmark.
Related papers
- $φ$-DPO: Fairness Direct Preference Optimization Approach to Continual Learning in Large Multimodal Models [58.217707070069885]
This paper presents a novel Fairness Direct Preference Optimization (FaiDPO or $$-DPO) framework for continual learning in LMMs.<n>We first propose a new continual learning paradigm based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to mitigate catastrophic forgetting by aligning learning with pairwise preference signals.<n> Extensive experiments and ablation studies show the proposed $$-DPO achieves State-of-the-Art performance across multiple benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T04:14:33Z) - Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z) - Owen-Shapley Policy Optimization (OSPO): A Principled RL Algorithm for Generative Search LLMs [12.75200353208858]
Owen-Shapley Policy Optimization (OSPO) is a framework that redistributes sequence-level advantages based on tokens' marginal contributions to outcomes.<n>Unlike value-model-based methods requiring additional computation, OSPO employs potential-based reward shaping via Shapley-Owen attributions to assign segment-level credit.<n> Experiments on Amazon ESCI and H&M Fashion datasets show consistent gains over baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:17:46Z) - Stable Preference Optimization for LLMs: A Bilevel Approach Beyond Direct Preference Optimization [2.384797824772941]
We present a comprehensive analysis of DPO's dynamics from a probability evolution perspective.<n>We propose a theoretically grounded bilevel optimization framework that tightly integrate supervised fine-tuning with an enhanced DPO objective a.k.a. stable preference optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T12:57:39Z) - Self-NPO: Negative Preference Optimization of Diffusion Models by Simply Learning from Itself without Explicit Preference Annotations [60.143658714894336]
Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable success in various visual generation tasks, including image, video, and 3D content generation.<n> Preference optimization (PO) is a prominent and growing area of research that aims to align these models with human preferences.<n>We introduce Self-NPO, a Negative Preference Optimization approach that learns exclusively from the model itself.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T01:03:46Z) - Leveraging Robust Optimization for LLM Alignment under Distribution Shifts [52.983390470606146]
Preference alignment methods are increasingly critical for steering large language models to generate outputs consistent with human values.<n>We propose a novel distribution-aware optimization framework that improves preference alignment despite such shifts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-08T09:14:38Z) - A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities.<n>Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments.<n>Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z) - TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights [73.9088920210495]
We propose a token-level importance sampling DPO objective named TIS-DPO that assigns importance weights to each token based on its reward.<n>TIS-DPO significantly outperforms various baseline methods on harmlessness and helpfulness alignment and summarization tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T04:03:00Z) - Self-Evolutionary Large Language Models through Uncertainty-Enhanced Preference Optimization [9.618391485742968]
Iterative preference optimization has recently become one of the de-facto training paradigms for large language models (LLMs)
We present an uncertainty-enhanced textbfPreference textbfOptimization framework to make the LLM self-evolve with reliable feedback.
Our framework substantially alleviates the noisy problem and improves the performance of iterative preference optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T14:05:58Z) - Direct Alignment of Language Models via Quality-Aware Self-Refinement [31.845241241178982]
We investigate the use of intrinsic knowledge within the on-the-fly fine-tuning LLM to obtain relative qualities and help to refine the loss function.
We show that the constructed refinement function can help self-refine the loss function under mild assumptions.
Experiments indicate that they can improve the performance of the fine-tuned models over DPO and IPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T17:31:18Z) - DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF [35.638723885233475]
We introduce an algorithm that learns the token-wise reward function from preference data and performs policy optimization based on this learned token-wise reward signal.<n>Experiments demonstrate that textttRTO performs better than PPO and other direct preference learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T17:58:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.