3-Local Hamiltonian Problem and Constant Relative Error Quantum Partition Function Approximation: $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}})$ Algorithm Is Nearly Optimal under QSETH

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07495v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 19:45:24 GMT
• Title: 3-Local Hamiltonian Problem and Constant Relative Error Quantum Partition Function Approximation: $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}})$ Algorithm Is Nearly Optimal under QSETH
• Authors: Nai-Hui Chia, Yu-Ching Shen,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the computational complexity of the Local Hamiltonian problem and the approximation of the Quantum Partition Function (QPF)<n>Both problems are known to be QMA-hard, and under the widely believed assumption that $mathsfBQP neq mathsfQMA$, no efficient quantum algorithm exits.<n>We prove that no quantum algorithm can solve either LH or approximate QPF significantly faster than $O(2n/2)$, even for 3-local Hamiltonians.
• Score: 0.6015898117103068
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate the computational complexity of the Local Hamiltonian (LH) problem and the approximation of the Quantum Partition Function (QPF), two central problems in quantum many-body physics and quantum complexity theory. Both problems are known to be QMA-hard, and under the widely believed assumption that $\mathsf{BQP} \neq \mathsf{QMA}$, no efficient quantum algorithm exits. The best known quantum algorithm for LH runs in $O\bigl(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1 - o(1))}\bigr)$ time, while for QPF, the state-of-the-art algorithm achieves relative error $\delta$ in $O^\ast\bigl(\frac{1}{\delta}\sqrt{\frac{2^n}{Z}}\bigr)$ time, where $Z$ denotes the value of the partition function. A nature open question is whether more efficient algorithms exist for both problems. In this work, we establish tight conditional lower bounds showing that these algorithms are nearly optimal. Under the plausible Quantum Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (QSETH), we prove that no quantum algorithm can solve either LH or approximate QPF significantly faster than $O(2^{n/2})$, even for 3-local Hamiltonians. In particular, we show: 1) 3-local LH cannot be solved in time $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1-\varepsilon)})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ under QSETH; 2) 3-local QPF cannot be approximated up to any constant relative error in $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1-\varepsilon)})$ time for any $\varepsilon > 0$ under QSETH; and 3) we present a quantum algorithm that approximates QPF up to relative error $1/2 + 1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ in $O^\ast(2^{n/2})$ time, matching our conditional lower bound. Notably, our results provide the first fine-grained lower bounds for both LH and QPF with fixed locality. This stands in sharp contrast to QSETH and the trivial fine-grained lower bounds for LH, where the locality of the SAT instance and the Hamiltonian depends on the parameter $\varepsilon$ in the $O(2^{\frac{n}{2}(1-\varepsilon)})$ running time.

Related papers

• Fine-Grained Complexity for Quantum Problems from Size-Preserving Circuit-to-Hamiltonian Constructions [1.43494686131174]
  We show that the 3-local Hamiltonian problem on $n$ qubits cannot be solved classically in time $O(2(1-varepsilon)n)$ for any $varepsilon>0$ under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH)<n>We provide a quantum algorithm that runs in $O(sqrt2n)$ time for an arbitrary $1/mathrmpoly(n)$ relative error, matching our lower bounds and improving the state-of-the-art algorithm by Bravyi, Chowdhury, Goss
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T01:11:55Z)
• Spectral Gaps with Quantum Counting Queries and Oblivious State Preparation [47.600794349481966]
  In this work, we present a quantum algorithm which approximates values up to additive error $epsilonDelta_k$ using a logarithmic number of qubits.<n>A key technical step in the analysis is the preparation of a suitable random initial state, which ultimately allows us to efficiently count the number of eigenvalues that are smaller than a threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T17:04:18Z)
• Slow Mixing of Quantum Gibbs Samplers [47.373245682678515]
  We present a quantum generalization of these tools through a generic bottleneck lemma.<n>This lemma focuses on quantum measures of distance, analogous to the classical Hamming distance but rooted in uniquely quantum principles.<n>We show how to lift classical slow mixing results in the presence of a transverse field using Poisson Feynman-Kac techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T22:51:27Z)
• Quantum spectral method for gradient and Hessian estimation [4.193480001271463]
  Gradient descent is one of the most basic algorithms for solving continuous optimization problems. We propose a quantum algorithm that returns an $varepsilon$-approximation of its gradient with query complexity $widetildeO (1/varepsilon)$. We also propose two quantum algorithms for Hessian estimation, aiming to improve quantum analogs of Newton's method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T11:03:48Z)
• Hamiltonian simulation for low-energy states with optimal time dependence [45.02537589779136]
  We consider the task of simulating time evolution under a Hamiltonian $H$ within its low-energy subspace. We present a quantum algorithm that uses $O(tsqrtlambdaGamma + sqrtlambda/Gammalog (1/epsilon))$ queries to the block-encoding for any $Gamma$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T17:58:01Z)
• A polynomial-time dissipation-based quantum algorithm for solving the ground states of a class of classically hard Hamiltonians [4.500918096201963]
  We give a complexity-time quantum algorithm for solving the ground states of a class of classically hard Hamiltonians. We show that the Hamiltonians that can be efficiently solved by our algorithms contain classically hard instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T05:01:02Z)
• A Quantum Approximation Scheme for k-Means [0.16317061277457]
  We give a quantum approximation scheme for the classical $k$-means clustering problem in the QRAM model.<n>Our quantum algorithm runs in time $tildeO left( 2tildeO(frackvarepsilon) eta2 dright)$.<n>Unlike previous works on unsupervised learning, our quantum algorithm does not require quantum linear algebra subroutines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T06:46:37Z)
• Near-Optimal Bounds for Learning Gaussian Halfspaces with Random Classification Noise [50.64137465792738]
  We show that any efficient SQ algorithm for the problem requires sample complexity at least $Omega(d1/2/(maxp, epsilon)2)$. Our lower bound suggests that this quadratic dependence on $1/epsilon$ is inherent for efficient algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T18:59:28Z)
• Quantum Speedups for Bayesian Network Structure Learning [12.02309220445177]
  For networks with $n$ nodes, the fastest known algorithms run in time $O(2n n2)$ in the worst case, with no improvement in two decades.<n>Inspired by recent advances in quantum computing, we ask whether the problem can be solved by a quantum algorithm in time $O(cn)$ for some constant $c$ less than $2$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T09:15:28Z)
• Succinct quantum testers for closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions [2.3466828785520373]
  We explore potential quantum speedups for the fundamental problem of testing the properties of closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions. We show that the quantum query complexities for $ell1$- and $ell2$-closeness testing are $O(sqrtn/varepsilon)$ and $O(sqrtnk/varepsilon)$. We propose the first quantum algorithm for this problem with query complexity $O(sqrtnk/varepsilon)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T15:32:37Z)
• Mind the gap: Achieving a super-Grover quantum speedup by jumping to the end [114.3957763744719]
  We present a quantum algorithm that has rigorous runtime guarantees for several families of binary optimization problems. We show that the algorithm finds the optimal solution in time $O*(2(0.5-c)n)$ for an $n$-independent constant $c$. We also show that for a large fraction of random instances from the $k$-spin model and for any fully satisfiable or slightly frustrated $k$-CSP formula, statement (a) is the case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-03T02:45:23Z)
• Threshold Phenomena in Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise [56.01192577666607]
  We study the problem of PAC learning halfspaces on $mathbbRd$ with Massart noise under Gaussian marginals. Our results qualitatively characterize the complexity of learning halfspaces in the Massart model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T16:16:48Z)
• An Optimal Separation of Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity [67.19751155411075]
  We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order $ellsqrtbinomdell (1+log n)ell-1,$ sum to at most $cellsqrtbinomdell (1+log n)ell-1,$ where $n$ is the number of variables, $d$ is the tree depth, and $c>0$ is an absolute constant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T06:50:57Z)
• Agnostic Q-learning with Function Approximation in Deterministic Systems: Tight Bounds on Approximation Error and Sample Complexity [94.37110094442136]
  We study the problem of agnostic $Q$-learning with function approximation in deterministic systems. We show that if $delta = Oleft(rho/sqrtdim_Eright)$, then one can find the optimal policy using $Oleft(dim_Eright)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T18:41:49Z)
• Fixed-Support Wasserstein Barycenters: Computational Hardness and Fast Algorithm [100.11971836788437]
  We study the fixed-support Wasserstein barycenter problem (FS-WBP) We develop a provably fast textitdeterministic variant of the celebrated iterative Bregman projection (IBP) algorithm, named textscFastIBP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T03:40:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.