DGTEN: A Robust Deep Gaussian based Graph Neural Network for Dynamic Trust Evaluation with Uncertainty-Quantification Support
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07620v1
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 23:38:55 GMT
- Title: DGTEN: A Robust Deep Gaussian based Graph Neural Network for Dynamic Trust Evaluation with Uncertainty-Quantification Support
- Authors: Muhammad Usman, Yugyung Lee,
- Abstract summary: DGTEN (Deep Gaussian-based Trust Evaluation Network) introduces a unified graph framework.<n>It combines uncertainty-aware message passing, expressive temporal modeling, and built-in defenses against trust-targeted attacks.<n>On two signed Bitcoin trust networks, DGTEN delivers significant improvements.
- Score: 2.4897847232811716
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Dynamic trust evaluation in large, rapidly evolving graphs requires models that can capture changing relationships, express calibrated confidence, and resist adversarial manipulation. DGTEN (Deep Gaussian-based Trust Evaluation Network) introduces a unified graph framework that achieves all three by combining uncertainty-aware message passing, expressive temporal modeling, and built-in defenses against trust-targeted attacks. It represents nodes and edges as Gaussian distributions so that both semantic signals and epistemic uncertainty propagate through the graph neural network, enabling risk-aware trust decisions rather than overconfident guesses. To model how trust evolves, it employs hybrid Absolute-Gaussian-Hourglass (HAGH) positional encoding with Kolmogorov-Arnold network-based unbiased multi-head attention, followed by an ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based residual learning module to jointly capture abrupt shifts and smooth trends. Robust adaptive ensemble coefficient analysis prunes or down-weights suspicious interactions using complementary cosine and Jaccard similarity measures, mitigating reputation laundering, sabotage, and on/off attacks. On two signed Bitcoin trust networks, DGTEN delivers significant improvements: in single-timeslot prediction on Bitcoin-Alpha, it improves MCC by 10.77% over the best dynamic baseline; in the cold-start scenario, it achieves a 16.41% MCC gain - the largest across all tasks and datasets. Under adversarial on/off attacks, it surpasses the baseline by up to 11.63% MCC. These results validate the effectiveness of the unified DGTEN framework.
Related papers
- Tri-LLM Cooperative Federated Zero-Shot Intrusion Detection with Semantic Disagreement and Trust-Aware Aggregation [5.905949608791961]
This paper introduces a semantics-driven federated IDS framework that incorporates language-derived semantic supervision into federated optimization.<n>The framework achieves over 80% zero-shot detection accuracy on unseen attack patterns, improving zero-day discrimination by more than 10% compared to similarity-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T16:38:05Z) - CAT: Can Trust be Predicted with Context-Awareness in Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks? [10.476593803368358]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for trust prediction.<n>These models fail to capture trust dynamicity, leading to questionable inferences.<n>We propose CAT, the first Context-Aware GNN-based Trust prediction model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T08:00:28Z) - FLARE: Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Reputation for Robust Client Reliability in Federated Learning [0.6524460254566904]
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy.<n>It remains vulnerable to malicious clients who compromise model integrity through Byzantine attacks, data poisoning, or adaptive adversarial behaviors.<n>We propose FLARE, an adaptive reputation-based framework that transforms client reliability assessment from binary decisions to a continuous, multi-dimensional trust evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T17:57:40Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Graph Neural Networks: A Multi-Hop Evidence Fusion Approach [55.43914153271912]
Graph neural networks (GNNs) excel in graph representation learning by integrating graph structure and node features.<n>Existing GNNs fail to account for the uncertainty of class probabilities that vary with the depth of the model, leading to unreliable and risky predictions in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel Evidence Fusing Graph Neural Network (EFGNN for short) to achieve trustworthy prediction, enhance node classification accuracy, and make explicit the risk of wrong predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T03:59:38Z) - Feature Statistics with Uncertainty Help Adversarial Robustness [19.01087281157066]
adversarial attacks tend to shift the distributions of feature statistics.<n>We propose an uncertainty-driven feature statistics adjustment module for robustness enhancement.<n>The proposed FSU module has universal applicability in training, attacking, predicting, and fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-26T14:30:33Z) - Towards Adversarial Robustness via Debiased High-Confidence Logit Alignment [24.577363665112706]
Under inverse adversarial attacks, high-confidence outputs are influenced by biased feature activations.<n>This spurious correlation bias leads to overfitting irrelevant background features during adversarial training.<n>We propose Debiased High-Confidence Adversarial Training (DHAT), a novel approach that aligns adversarial logits with debiased high-confidence logits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T11:56:06Z) - TrustGuard: GNN-based Robust and Explainable Trust Evaluation with
Dynamicity Support [59.41529066449414]
We propose TrustGuard, a GNN-based accurate trust evaluation model that supports trust dynamicity.
TrustGuard is designed with a layered architecture that contains a snapshot input layer, a spatial aggregation layer, a temporal aggregation layer, and a prediction layer.
Experiments show that TrustGuard outperforms state-of-the-art GNN-based trust evaluation models with respect to trust prediction across single-timeslot and multi-timeslot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T07:39:12Z) - TrustGNN: Graph Neural Network based Trust Evaluation via Learnable
Propagative and Composable Nature [63.78619502896071]
Trust evaluation is critical for many applications such as cyber security, social communication and recommender systems.
We propose a new GNN based trust evaluation method named TrustGNN, which integrates smartly the propagative and composable nature of trust graphs.
Specifically, TrustGNN designs specific propagative patterns for different propagative processes of trust, and distinguishes the contribution of different propagative processes to create new trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-25T13:57:03Z) - PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Network [161.76275845530964]
Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Network, PDC-Net+, capable of estimating accurate dense correspondences.
We develop an architecture and an enhanced training strategy tailored for robust and generalizable uncertainty prediction.
Our approach obtains state-of-the-art results on multiple challenging geometric matching and optical flow datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-28T17:56:41Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Deep Calibrated Salient Object Detection [74.58153220370527]
Existing deep neural network based salient object detection (SOD) methods mainly focus on pursuing high network accuracy.
These methods overlook the gap between network accuracy and prediction confidence, known as the confidence uncalibration problem.
We introduce an uncertaintyaware deep SOD network, and propose two strategies to prevent deep SOD networks from being overconfident.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T23:28:36Z) - Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual
Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning.
These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice.
The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.