Sentiment Matters: An Analysis of 200 Human-SAV Interactions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08202v1
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 13:30:23 GMT
- Title: Sentiment Matters: An Analysis of 200 Human-SAV Interactions
- Authors: Lirui Guo, Michael G. Burke, Wynita M. Griggs,
- Abstract summary: Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs) are likely to become an important part of the transportation system.<n>This paper introduces a dataset of 200 human-SAV interactions.<n>We present an open-source human-SAV conversational dataset.
- Score: 1.0195618602298684
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs) are likely to become an important part of the transportation system, making effective human-SAV interactions an important area of research. This paper introduces a dataset of 200 human-SAV interactions to further this area of study. We present an open-source human-SAV conversational dataset, comprising both textual data (e.g., 2,136 human-SAV exchanges) and empirical data (e.g., post-interaction survey results on a range of psychological factors). The dataset's utility is demonstrated through two benchmark case studies: First, using random forest modeling and chord diagrams, we identify key predictors of SAV acceptance and perceived service quality, highlighting the critical influence of response sentiment polarity (i.e., perceived positivity). Second, we benchmark the performance of an LLM-based sentiment analysis tool against the traditional lexicon-based TextBlob method. Results indicate that even simple zero-shot LLM prompts more closely align with user-reported sentiment, though limitations remain. This study provides novel insights for designing conversational SAV interfaces and establishes a foundation for further exploration into advanced sentiment modeling, adaptive user interactions, and multimodal conversational systems.
Related papers
- OASST-ETC Dataset: Alignment Signals from Eye-tracking Analysis of LLM Responses [3.6046810704919063]
OASST-ETC is a novel eye-tracking corpus capturing reading patterns from 24 participants.<n>Our analysis reveals distinct reading patterns between preferred and non-preferred responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T22:28:38Z) - Mind the Gap! Static and Interactive Evaluations of Large Audio Models [55.87220295533817]
Large Audio Models (LAMs) are designed to power voice-native experiences.<n>This study introduces an interactive approach to evaluate LAMs and collect 7,500 LAM interactions from 484 participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-21T20:29:02Z) - Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion.
In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation.
We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z) - Automated Speaking Assessment of Conversation Tests with Novel Graph-based Modeling on Spoken Response Coherence [11.217656140423207]
ASAC aims to evaluate the overall speaking proficiency of an L2 speaker in a setting where an interlocutor interacts with one or more candidates.<n>We propose a hierarchical graph model that aptly incorporates both broad inter-response interactions and nuanced semantic information.<n>Extensive experimental results on the NICT-JLE benchmark dataset suggest that our proposed modeling approach can yield considerable improvements in prediction accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T07:24:07Z) - A Review of Human-Object Interaction Detection [10.20202786261744]
Human-object interaction (HOI) detection plays a key role in high-level visual understanding.<n>This paper systematically summarizes and discusses the recent work in image-based HOI detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T08:32:39Z) - Enhancing HOI Detection with Contextual Cues from Large Vision-Language Models [56.257840490146]
ConCue is a novel approach for improving visual feature extraction in HOI detection.
We develop a transformer-based feature extraction module with a multi-tower architecture that integrates contextual cues into both instance and interaction detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-26T09:11:32Z) - Multi-modal Facial Affective Analysis based on Masked Autoencoder [7.17338843593134]
We introduce our submission to the CVPR 2023: ABAW5 competition: Affective Behavior Analysis in-the-wild.
Our approach involves several key components. First, we utilize the visual information from a Masked Autoencoder(MAE) model that has been pre-trained on a large-scale face image dataset in a self-supervised manner.
Our approach achieves impressive results in the ABAW5 competition, with an average F1 score of 55.49% and 41.21% in the AU and EXPR tracks, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T03:58:03Z) - Weakly-Supervised HOI Detection from Interaction Labels Only and
Language/Vision-Language Priors [36.75629570208193]
Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to extract interacting human-object pairs and their interaction categories from a given natural image.
In this paper, we tackle HOI detection with the weakest supervision setting in the literature, using only image-level interaction labels.
We first propose an approach to prune non-interacting human and object proposals to increase the quality of positive pairs within the bag, exploiting the grounding capability of the vision-language model.
Second, we use a large language model to query which interactions are possible between a human and a given object category, in order to force the model not to put emphasis
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-09T19:08:02Z) - Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A
Survey [71.43956423427397]
We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance.
This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings.
Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z) - BOSS: A Benchmark for Human Belief Prediction in Object-context
Scenarios [14.23697277904244]
This paper uses the combined knowledge of Theory of Mind (ToM) and Object-Context Relations to investigate methods for enhancing collaboration between humans and autonomous systems.
We propose a novel and challenging multimodal video dataset for assessing the capability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in predicting human belief states in an object-context scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T18:29:17Z) - Human Trajectory Forecasting in Crowds: A Deep Learning Perspective [89.4600982169]
We present an in-depth analysis of existing deep learning-based methods for modelling social interactions.
We propose two knowledge-based data-driven methods to effectively capture these social interactions.
We develop a large scale interaction-centric benchmark TrajNet++, a significant yet missing component in the field of human trajectory forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-07T17:19:56Z) - Learning Human-Object Interaction Detection using Interaction Points [140.0200950601552]
We propose a novel fully-convolutional approach that directly detects the interactions between human-object pairs.
Our network predicts interaction points, which directly localize and classify the inter-action.
Experiments are performed on two popular benchmarks: V-COCO and HICO-DET.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-31T08:42:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.