Opponent Shaping in LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08255v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:13:24 GMT
• Title: Opponent Shaping in LLM Agents
• Authors: Marta Emili Garcia Segura, Stephen Hailes, Mirco Musolesi,
• Abstract summary: We present the first investigation of opponent shaping (OS) with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Using ShapeLLM, we examine whether LLM agents can influence co-players' learning dynamics across diverse game-theoretic environments.<n>Our findings show that LLM agents can both shape and be shaped through interaction, establishing opponent shaping as a key dimension of multi-agent LLM research.
• Score: 9.180524457769751
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed as autonomous agents in real-world environments. As these deployments scale, multi-agent interactions become inevitable, making it essential to understand strategic behavior in such systems. A central open question is whether LLM agents, like reinforcement learning agents, can shape the learning dynamics and influence the behavior of others through interaction alone. In this paper, we present the first investigation of opponent shaping (OS) with LLM-based agents. Existing OS algorithms cannot be directly applied to LLMs, as they require higher-order derivatives, face scalability constraints, or depend on architectural components that are absent in transformers. To address this gap, we introduce ShapeLLM, an adaptation of model-free OS methods tailored for transformer-based agents. Using ShapeLLM, we examine whether LLM agents can influence co-players' learning dynamics across diverse game-theoretic environments. We demonstrate that LLM agents can successfully guide opponents toward exploitable equilibria in competitive games (Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, Matching Pennies, and Chicken) and promote coordination and improve collective welfare in cooperative games (Iterated Stag Hunt and a cooperative version of the Prisoner's Dilemma). Our findings show that LLM agents can both shape and be shaped through interaction, establishing opponent shaping as a key dimension of multi-agent LLM research.

Related papers

• Learning Robust Social Strategies with Large Language Models [7.697496386429445]
  Reinforcement learning is effective for aligning large language models (LLMs) in the single-agent regime.<n>We show that standard RL in multi-agent settings often converges to defecting, self-interested policies.<n>To address this tendency of RL to converge to poor equilibria, we adapt a recent opponent-learning awareness algorithm, Advantage Alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T18:43:46Z)
• CoMAS: Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Interaction Rewards [80.78748457530718]
  Self-evolution is a central research topic in enabling large language model (LLM)-based agents to continually improve their capabilities after pretraining.<n>We introduce Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems (CoMAS), a novel framework that enables agents to improve autonomously by learning from inter-agent interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:50:26Z)
• Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games [87.5673042805229]
  How large language models balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment.<n>We adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from behavioral economics, allowing us to observe how different LLMs navigate social dilemmas.<n>Surprisingly, we find that reasoning LLMs, such as the o1 series, struggle significantly with cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T15:02:47Z)
• Training LLM-Based Agents with Synthetic Self-Reflected Trajectories and Partial Masking [61.61356842567952]
  We propose STeP, a novel method for improving LLM-based agent training.<n>We synthesize self-reflected trajectories that include reflections and corrections of error steps.<n>Experiments demonstrate that our method improves agent performance across three representative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:11:12Z)
• SAC-GLAM: Improving Online RL for LLM agents with Soft Actor-Critic and Hindsight Relabeling [29.29604779151457]
  This paper presents and studies an adaptation of Soft Actor-Critic and hindsight relabeling to LLM agents. Our method paves the path towards autotelic LLM agents that learn online but can also outperform on-policy methods in more classic multi-goal RL environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T11:59:27Z)
• Can LLMs Understand Social Norms in Autonomous Driving Games? [13.379617052828353]
  Social norms are defined as a shared standard of acceptable behavior in a society. This paper explores the application of LLMs in understanding and modeling social norms in autonomous driving games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T18:39:00Z)
• Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [68.29746557968107]
  We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans.<n> Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z)
• Challenges Faced by Large Language Models in Solving Multi-Agent Flocking [17.081075782529098]
  Flocking is a behavior where multiple agents in a system attempt to stay close to each other while avoiding collision and maintaining a desired formation.<n>Recently, large language models (LLMs) have displayed an impressive ability to solve various collaboration tasks as individual decision-makers.<n>This paper discusses the challenges LLMs face in multi-agent flocking and suggests areas for future improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:34:07Z)
• ALYMPICS: LLM Agents Meet Game Theory -- Exploring Strategic Decision-Making with AI Agents [77.34720446306419]
  Alympics is a systematic simulation framework utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents for game theory research. Alympics creates a versatile platform for studying complex game theory problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T16:03:46Z)
• LLM-Based Agent Society Investigation: Collaboration and Confrontation in Avalon Gameplay [55.12945794835791]
  Using Avalon as a testbed, we employ system prompts to guide LLM agents in gameplay. We propose a novel framework, tailored for Avalon, features a multi-agent system facilitating efficient communication and interaction. Results affirm the framework's effectiveness in creating adaptive agents and suggest LLM-based agents' potential in navigating dynamic social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T14:35:26Z)
• AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [99.12825098528212]
  Large Language Model (LLM) as agents has been widely acknowledged recently.<n>We present AgentBench, a benchmark that consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.