MRMR: A Realistic and Expert-Level Multidisciplinary Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Multimodal Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09510v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:14:56 GMT
• Title: MRMR: A Realistic and Expert-Level Multidisciplinary Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Multimodal Retrieval
• Authors: Siyue Zhang, Yuan Gao, Xiao Zhou, Yilun Zhao, Tingyu Song, Arman Cohan, Anh Tuan Luu, Chen Zhao,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MRMR, the first expert-level multidisciplinary multimodal retrieval benchmark requiring intensive reasoning.<n>It challenges retrieval systems across diverse areas of expertise, enabling fine-grained model comparison across domains.<n> queries are reasoning-intensive, with images requiring deeper interpretation such as diagnosing microscopic slides.
• Score: 87.24221266746686
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce MRMR, the first expert-level multidisciplinary multimodal retrieval benchmark requiring intensive reasoning. MRMR contains 1,502 queries spanning 23 domains, with positive documents carefully verified by human experts. Compared to prior benchmarks, MRMR introduces three key advancements. First, it challenges retrieval systems across diverse areas of expertise, enabling fine-grained model comparison across domains. Second, queries are reasoning-intensive, with images requiring deeper interpretation such as diagnosing microscopic slides. We further introduce Contradiction Retrieval, a novel task requiring models to identify conflicting concepts. Finally, queries and documents are constructed as image-text interleaved sequences. Unlike earlier benchmarks restricted to single images or unimodal documents, MRMR offers a realistic setting with multi-image queries and mixed-modality corpus documents. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 4 categories of multimodal retrieval systems and 14 frontier models on MRMR. The text embedding model Qwen3-Embedding with LLM-generated image captions achieves the highest performance, highlighting substantial room for improving multimodal retrieval models. Although latest multimodal models such as Ops-MM-Embedding perform competitively on expert-domain queries, they fall short on reasoning-intensive tasks. We believe that MRMR paves the way for advancing multimodal retrieval in more realistic and challenging scenarios.

Related papers

• M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine [20.495948250806325]
  We release M3Retrieve, a benchmark for multimodal medical retrieval models.<n>M3Retrieve spans 5 domains, 16 medical fields, and 4 distinct tasks.<n>We evaluate leading multimodal retrieval models on this benchmark to explore the challenges specific to different medical specialities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T11:08:47Z)
• UNIDOC-BENCH: A Unified Benchmark for Document-Centric Multimodal RAG [82.84014669683863]
  Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (MM-RAG) is a key approach for applying large language models to real-world knowledge bases.<n>UniDoc-Bench is the first large-scale, realistic benchmark for MM-RAG built from 70k real-world PDF pages.<n>Our experiments show that multimodal text-image fusion RAG systems consistently outperform both unimodal and jointly multimodal embedding-based retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T04:30:13Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Generation for Document Question Answering [60.062194349648195]
  Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) faces dual challenges in processing lengthy multimodal documents.<n>Current document retrieval-augmented generation (DocRAG) methods remain limited by their text-centric approaches.<n>We introduce MMDocRAG, a comprehensive benchmark featuring 4,055 expert-annotated QA pairs with multi-page, cross-modal evidence chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:52:57Z)
• CoLLM: A Large Language Model for Composed Image Retrieval [76.29725148964368]
  Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is a complex task that aims to retrieve images based on a multimodal query.<n>We present CoLLM, a one-stop framework that generates triplets on-the-fly from image-caption pairs.<n>We leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate joint embeddings of reference images and modification texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T17:59:50Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal Contexts [56.7225771305861]
  This paper introduces Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (M$2$RAG), a benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Multi-modal Large Language Models.<n>The benchmark comprises four tasks: image captioning, multi-modal question answering, multi-modal fact verification, and image reranking.<n>To enhance the context utilization capabilities of MLLMs, we also introduce Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning (MM-RAIT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T16:25:25Z)
• Beyond Text: Optimizing RAG with Multimodal Inputs for Industrial Applications [3.7636375810345744]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in answering questions, but they lack domain-specific knowledge and are prone to hallucinations. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is one approach to address these challenges, while multimodal models are emerging as promising AI assistants for processing both text and images. We describe a series of experiments aimed at determining how to best integrate multimodal models into RAG systems for the industrial domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T11:03:31Z)
• Retrieval Meets Reasoning: Even High-school Textbook Knowledge Benefits Multimodal Reasoning [49.3242278912771]
  We introduce a novel multimodal RAG framework named RMR (Retrieval Meets Reasoning) The RMR framework employs a bi-modal retrieval module to identify the most relevant question-answer pairs. It significantly boosts the performance of various vision-language models across a spectrum of benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:23:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.