Don't Throw Away Your Pretrained Model
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09913v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 23:12:20 GMT
- Title: Don't Throw Away Your Pretrained Model
- Authors: Shangbin Feng, Wenhao Yu, Yike Wang, Hongming Zhang, Yulia Tsvetkov, Dong Yu,
- Abstract summary: We aim to make the best of both worlds through model collaboration.<n>We propose Switch Generation, where pretrained and aligned model versions take turns to speak'' in a response sequence.
- Score: 68.63558351111303
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Alignment training has tradeoffs: it helps language models (LMs) gain in reasoning and instruction following but might lose out on skills such as creativity and calibration, where unaligned base models are better at. We aim to make the best of both worlds through model collaboration, where different models in the training pipeline collaborate and complement each other. Since LM responses feature interleaving skills that favor different models, we propose Switch Generation, where pretrained and aligned model versions take turns to ``speak'' in a response sequence. Specifically, we train a switcher LM by learning from outcomes of choosing different models to generate the next segment across diverse queries and contexts. At inference time, the switcher LM guides different model checkpoints to dynamically generate the next segment where their strengths are most needed. Extensive experiments with 8 model collaboration baselines and 18 datasets show that 1) model collaboration consistently outperforms individual models on 16 out of 18 tasks, and 2) Switch Generation further outperforms baselines by 12.9% on average. Further analysis reveals that Switch Generation discovers compositional skills to solve problems where individual models struggle and generalizes to unseen models and tasks, reusing and repurposing by-products in expensive model training pipelines that are otherwise discarded.
Related papers
- J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement Learning [54.85131761693927]
We introduce J1, a reinforcement learning framework for teaching LLM judges to think before making decisions.<n>Our core contribution lies in converting all judgment tasks for non-verifiable and verifiable prompts into a unified format with verifiable rewards.<n>We then use RL to train thinking-judges at scales of 8B, 32B, and 70B and show that they obtain state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-15T14:05:15Z) - Rethinking Data Synthesis: A Teacher Model Training Recipe with Interpretation [12.736045604858738]
Recent advances in large language model (LLM) training have highlighted the need for diverse, high-quality instruction data.<n>We propose a paradigm shift named textbfNOMAD by investigating how to specifically train models for data generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-27T07:38:39Z) - What Matters for Model Merging at Scale? [94.26607564817786]
Model merging aims to combine multiple expert models into a more capable single model.
Previous studies have primarily focused on merging a few small models.
This study systematically evaluates the utility of model merging at scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T17:17:19Z) - EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Merging [55.03509900949149]
We show that Elect, Mask & Rescale-Merging (EMR-Merging) shows outstanding performance compared to existing merging methods.
EMR-Merging is tuning-free, thus requiring no data availability or any additional training while showing impressive performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T05:25:45Z) - Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of
General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other.
We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z) - Matching Pairs: Attributing Fine-Tuned Models to their Pre-Trained Large
Language Models [11.57282859281814]
We consider different knowledge levels and attribution strategies, and find that we can correctly trace back 8 out of the 10 fine tuned models with our best method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T17:42:48Z) - Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [47.432215933099016]
Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models.<n>This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model.<n>We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z) - Composing Ensembles of Pre-trained Models via Iterative Consensus [95.10641301155232]
We propose a unified framework for composing ensembles of different pre-trained models.
We use pre-trained models as "generators" or "scorers" and compose them via closed-loop iterative consensus optimization.
We demonstrate that consensus achieved by an ensemble of scorers outperforms the feedback of a single scorer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-20T18:46:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.