Designing Tools with Control Confidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12630v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:27:27 GMT
• Title: Designing Tools with Control Confidence
• Abstract summary: We introduce a neuro-inspired control confidence term into the optimization routine for task-conditioned autonomous hand tool design for robots.<n>We show that tools designed with control confidence are more robust to environmental uncertainties during tool use than a pure accuracy-driven objective.<n>Our CMAES-based evolutionary optimization strategy for autonomous tool design outperforms other state-of-the-arts.
• Score: 0.5161531917413708
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Prehistoric humans invented stone tools for specialized tasks by not just maximizing the tool's immediate goal-completion accuracy, but also increasing their confidence in the tool for later use under similar settings. This factor contributed to the increased robustness of the tool, i.e., the least performance deviations under environmental uncertainties. However, the current autonomous tool design frameworks solely rely on performance optimization, without considering the agent's confidence in tool use for repeated use. Here, we take a step towards filling this gap by i) defining an optimization framework for task-conditioned autonomous hand tool design for robots, where ii) we introduce a neuro-inspired control confidence term into the optimization routine that helps the agent to design tools with higher robustness. Through rigorous simulations using a robotic arm, we show that tools designed with control confidence as the objective function are more robust to environmental uncertainties during tool use than a pure accuracy-driven objective. We further show that adding control confidence to the objective function for tool design provides a balance between the robustness and goal accuracy of the designed tools under control perturbations. Finally, we show that our CMAES-based evolutionary optimization strategy for autonomous tool design outperforms other state-of-the-art optimizers by designing the optimal tool within the fewest iterations. Code: https://github.com/ajitham123/Tool_design_control_confidence.

Related papers

• SING: Synthetic Intention Graph for Scalable Active Tool Discovery in LLM Agents [64.59100414726556]
  Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on harnesses that manage context, tools, and multi-turn execution.<n>Retrieval-augmented tool selection offers a natural alternative, but existing one-shot retrieval methods fail to align isolated tool descriptions with the agent's true task intention.<n>We propose SING, an intention-aware active tool discovery framework that builds an intention-tool graph linking user intentions, tool capabilities, and tool collaboration patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T11:37:37Z)
• Enabling Extensible Embodied Capabilities with Tools [29.084279305733336]
  Embodied intelligence methods formulate perception, reasoning, planning, and control within a unified parameterized policy.<n>We propose a capability externalization approach that decouples heterogeneous capabilities into independently optimized tools, dynamically invoked at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T07:18:36Z)
• Open, Reliable, and Collective: A Community-Driven Framework for Tool-Using AI Agents [22.64138018985385]
  We argue that failures stem from both tool-use accuracy (how well an agent invokes a tool) and intrinsic tool accuracy (the tool's own correctness)<n>We introduce OpenTools, a community-driven toolbox that standardizes tool schemas.<n>OpenTools includes the core framework, an initial tool set, evaluation pipelines, and a contribution protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T18:42:36Z)
• Tool-Genesis: A Task-Driven Tool Creation Benchmark for Self-Evolving Language Agent [45.450766613995135]
  Tool-Genesis is a diagnostic benchmark designed to quantify agent capabilities across multiple dimensions.<n>We find that even state-of-the-art models struggle to produce precise tool interfaces or executable logic in a one-shot setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T17:44:29Z)
• Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use [21.666294374943178]
  We propose a curriculum learning framework that transfers supervision from trace-rich settings to trace-free deployment.<n> Experiments show consistent gains on unseen tools, strong cross-domain generalization, and robustness as the number of candidate tools scales to over 100.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T23:50:24Z)
• Evolving from Tool User to Creator via Training-Free Experience Reuse in Multimodal Reasoning [16.12114923351562]
  We propose a training-free framework that transforms agents from tool users to tool creators.<n>This approach harvests reasoning experiences and distills them into reusable assets.<n>We also introduce a memory consolidation mechanism to maintain the tool library.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T11:37:45Z)
• PerfGuard: A Performance-Aware Agent for Visual Content Generation [53.591105729011595]
  PerfGuard is a performance-aware agent framework for visual content generation.<n>It integrates tool performance boundaries into task planning and scheduling.<n>It has advantages in tool selection accuracy, execution reliability, and alignment with user intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T05:12:19Z)
• The Confidence Dichotomy: Analyzing and Mitigating Miscalibration in Tool-Use Agents [24.482362292984817]
  Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving to handle multi-turn tasks.<n> Ensuring their trustworthiness remains a critical challenge.<n> calibration refers to an agent's ability to express confidence that reliably reflects its actual performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T07:10:35Z)
• Feedback-Driven Tool-Use Improvements in Large Language Models via Automated Build Environments [70.42705564227548]
  We propose an automated environment construction pipeline for large language models (LLMs)<n>This enables the creation of high-quality training environments that provide detailed and measurable feedback without relying on external tools.<n>We also introduce a verifiable reward mechanism that evaluates both the precision of tool use and the completeness of task execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:45:19Z)
• Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently [87.28134636548705]
  Tool-integrated reasoning augments large language models with the ability to invoke external tools to solve tasks.<n>Current approaches typically optimize only for final correctness without considering the efficiency or necessity of external tool use.<n>We propose a framework that encourages models to produce accurate answers with minimal tool calls.<n>Our approach reduces tool calls by up to 68.3% and improves tool productivity by up to 215.4%, while maintaining comparable answer accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T05:40:05Z)
• ToolACE-R: Model-aware Iterative Training and Adaptive Refinement for Tool Learning [84.69651852838794]
  Tool learning allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to leverage external tools for solving complex user tasks.<n>We propose ToolACE-R, a novel framework that includes both model-aware iterative training and adaptive refinement for tool learning.<n>We conduct extensive experiments across several benchmark datasets, showing that ToolACE-R achieves competitive performance compared to advanced API-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T06:38:56Z)
• Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger [49.81945268343162]
  We propose MeCo, an adaptive decision-making strategy for external tool use.<n>MeCo quantifies metacognitive scores by capturing high-level cognitive signals in the representation space.<n>MeCo is fine-tuning-free and incurs minimal cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:45:01Z)
• SMART: Self-Aware Agent for Tool Overuse Mitigation [58.748554080273585]
  Current Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate strong reasoning and tool use capabilities, but often lack self-awareness.<n>This imbalance leads to Tool Overuse, where models unnecessarily rely on external tools for tasks with parametric knowledge.<n>We introduce SMART (Strategic Model-Aware Reasoning with Tools), a paradigm that enhances an agent's self-awareness to optimize task handling and reduce tool overuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T04:50:37Z)
• Confidence-Aware Decision-Making and Control for Tool Selection [1.550120821358415]
  Self-reflecting about our performance is essential for decision making. We introduce a mathematical framework that allows robots to use their control self-confidence to make better-informed decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T15:59:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.