ConDABench: Interactive Evaluation of Language Models for Data Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13835v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:54:51 GMT
• Title: ConDABench: Interactive Evaluation of Language Models for Data Analysis
• Authors: Avik Dutta, Priyanshu Gupta, Hosein Hasanbeig, Rahul Pratap Singh, Harshit Nigam, Sumit Gulwani, Arjun Radhakrishna, Gustavo Soares, Ashish Tiwari,
• Abstract summary: We introduce ConDABench, a framework for generating conversational data analysis (ConDA) benchmarks and evaluating external tools.<n>bench consists of (a) a multi-agent workflow for generating realistic benchmarks from articles describing insights gained from public datasets, (b) 1,420 ConDA problems generated using this workflow, and (c) an evaluation harness that, for the first time, makes it possible to systematically evaluate conversational data analysis tools on the generated ConDA problems.
• Score: 10.177407781044279
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Real-world data analysis tasks often come with under-specified goals and unclean data. User interaction is necessary to understand and disambiguate a user's intent, and hence, essential to solving these complex tasks. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs on data analysis tasks do not capture these complexities or provide first-class support for interactivity. We introduce ConDABench, a framework for generating conversational data analysis (ConDA) benchmarks and evaluating external tools on the generated benchmarks. \bench consists of (a) a multi-agent workflow for generating realistic benchmarks from articles describing insights gained from public datasets, (b) 1,420 ConDA problems generated using this workflow, and (c) an evaluation harness that, for the first time, makes it possible to systematically evaluate conversational data analysis tools on the generated ConDA problems. Evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs on the benchmarks reveals that while the new generation of models are better at solving more instances, they are not necessarily better at solving tasks that require sustained, long-form engagement. ConDABench is an avenue for model builders to measure progress towards truly collaborative models that can complete complex interactive tasks.

Related papers

• LongDA: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Document Data Analysis [55.32211515932351]
  LongDA targets real-world settings in which navigating long documentation and complex data is the primary bottleneck.<n>LongTA is a tool-augmented agent framework that enables document access, retrieval, and code execution.<n>Our experiments reveal substantial performance gaps even among state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T23:23:16Z)
• LoCoBench-Agent: An Interactive Benchmark for LLM Agents in Long-Context Software Engineering [90.84806758077536]
  We introduce textbfLoCoBench-Agent, a comprehensive evaluation framework specifically designed to assess large language models (LLMs) agents in realistic, long-context software engineering.<n>Our framework extends LoCoBench's 8,000 scenarios into interactive agent environments, enabling systematic evaluation of multi-turn conversations.<n>Our framework provides agents with 8 specialized tools (file operations, search, code analysis) and evaluates them across context lengths ranging from 10K to 1M tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T23:57:24Z)
• CoDA: Agentic Systems for Collaborative Data Visualization [57.270599188947294]
  Deep research has revolutionized data analysis, yet data scientists still devote substantial time to manually crafting visualizations.<n>Existing approaches, including simple single- or multi-agent systems, often oversimplify the task.<n>We introduce CoDA, a multi-agent system that employs specialized LLM agents for metadata analysis, task planning, code generation, and self-reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T17:30:16Z)
• Can LLMs Reason Structurally? An Evaluation via the Lens of Data Structures [21.390740746718947]
  We introduce DSR-Bench, the first benchmark to systematically evaluate large language models' structural reasoning.<n>The benchmark spans 20 data structures, 35 operations, and 4,140 synthetically generated problem instances with minimal contamination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T23:24:53Z)
• IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis [60.32962597618861]
  IDA-Bench is a novel benchmark evaluating large language models in multi-round interactive scenarios.<n>Agent performance is judged by comparing its final numerical output to the human-derived baseline.<n>Even state-of-the-art coding agents (like Claude-3.7-thinking) succeed on 50% of the tasks, highlighting limitations not evident in single-turn tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T09:37:52Z)
• Dynamic benchmarking framework for LLM-based conversational data capture [0.0]
  This paper introduces a benchmarking framework to assess large language models (LLMs)<n>It integrates generative agent simulation to evaluate performance on key dimensions: information extraction, context awareness, and adaptive engagement.<n>Results show that adaptive strategies improve data extraction accuracy, especially when handling ambiguous responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T15:47:47Z)
• NeedleBench: Evaluating LLM Retrieval and Reasoning Across Varying Information Densities [51.07379913779232]
  NeedleBench is a framework for assessing retrieval and reasoning performance in long-context tasks.<n>It embeds key data points at varying depths to rigorously test model capabilities.<n>Our experiments reveal that reasoning models like Deep-R1 and OpenAI's o3 struggle with continuous retrieval and reasoning in information-dense scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:59:06Z)
• InsightBench: Evaluating Business Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Generation [79.09622602860703]
  We introduce InsightBench, a benchmark dataset with three key features.<n>It consists of 100 datasets representing diverse business use cases such as finance and incident management.<n>Unlike existing benchmarks focusing on answering single queries, InsightBench evaluates agents based on their ability to perform end-to-end data analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T22:06:09Z)
• LLM Comparator: Visual Analytics for Side-by-Side Evaluation of Large Language Models [31.426274932333264]
  We present Comparator, a novel visual analytics tool for interactively analyzing results from automatic side-by-side evaluation. The tool supports interactive for users to understand when and why a model performs better or worse than a baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T09:14:49Z)
• On Evaluating the Integration of Reasoning and Action in LLM Agents with Database Question Answering [25.57202500348071]
  This study introduces a new long-form database question answering dataset designed to evaluate how Large Language Models interact with a database. The task requires LLMs to strategically generate multiplesql queries to retrieve sufficient data from a database, to reason with the acquired context, and to synthesize them into a comprehensive analytical narrative. We propose and evaluate two interaction strategies, and provide a fine-grained analysis of the individual stages within the interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T09:55:07Z)
• Analytical Engines With Context-Rich Processing: Towards Efficient Next-Generation Analytics [12.317930859033149]
  We envision an analytical engine co-optimized with components that enable context-rich analysis. We aim for a holistic pipeline cost- and rule-based optimization across relational and model-based operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T21:46:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.