Beyond Hallucinations: The Illusion of Understanding in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14665v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:19:44 GMT
• Title: Beyond Hallucinations: The Illusion of Understanding in Large Language Models
• Authors: Rikard Rosenbacke, Carl Rosenbacke, Victor Rosenbacke, Martin McKee,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming deeply embedded in human communication and decision-making.<n>They inherit the ambiguity, bias, and lack of direct access to truth inherent in language itself.<n>This paper argues that LLMs operationalize System 1 cognition at scale: fast, associative, and persuasive, but without reflection or falsification.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming deeply embedded in human communication and decision-making, yet they inherit the ambiguity, bias, and lack of direct access to truth inherent in language itself. While their outputs are fluent, emotionally resonant, and coherent, they are generated through statistical prediction rather than grounded reasoning. This creates the risk of hallucination, responses that sound convincing but lack factual validity. Building on Geoffrey Hinton's observation that AI mirrors human intuition rather than reasoning, this paper argues that LLMs operationalize System 1 cognition at scale: fast, associative, and persuasive, but without reflection or falsification. To address this, we introduce the Rose-Frame, a three-dimensional framework for diagnosing cognitive and epistemic drift in human-AI interaction. The three axes are: (i) Map vs. Territory, which distinguishes representations of reality (epistemology) from reality itself (ontology); (ii) Intuition vs. Reason, drawing on dual-process theory to separate fast, emotional judgments from slow, reflective thinking; and (iii) Conflict vs. Confirmation, which examines whether ideas are critically tested through disagreement or simply reinforced through mutual validation. Each dimension captures a distinct failure mode, and their combination amplifies misalignment. Rose-Frame does not attempt to fix LLMs with more data or rules. Instead, it offers a reflective tool that makes both the model's limitations and the user's assumptions visible, enabling more transparent and critically aware AI deployment. It reframes alignment as cognitive governance: intuition, whether human or artificial, must remain governed by human reason. Only by embedding reflective, falsifiable oversight can we align machine fluency with human understanding.

Related papers

• ADEPT: RL-Aligned Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools -- From Consensus Learning to Ambiguity-Driven Emotion Reasoning [67.22219034602514]
  We introduce ADEPT (Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools), a framework that reframes emotion recognition as a multi-turn inquiry process.<n> ADEPT transforms an SLLM into an agent that maintains an evolving candidate emotion set and adaptively invokes dedicated semantic and acoustic probing tools.<n>We show that ADEPT improves primary emotion accuracy in most settings while substantially improving minor emotion characterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T08:33:37Z)
• Think Visually, Reason Textually: Vision-Language Synergy in ARC [94.15522924153264]
  ARC-AGI is a rigorous testbed for conceptual rule induction and transfer to novel tasks.<n>Most existing methods treat ARC-AGI as a purely textual reasoning task, overlooking the fact that humans rely heavily on visual abstraction.<n>We introduce two synergistic strategies: Vision-Language Synergy Reasoning (VLSR) and Modality-Switch Self-Correction (MSSC)<n>Our findings suggest that unifying visual abstraction with linguistic reasoning is a crucial step toward achieving generalizable, human-like intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T18:59:04Z)
• Distributional Semantics Tracing: A Framework for Explaining Hallucinations in Large Language Models [4.946483489399819]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination, the generation of factually incorrect statements.<n>This work investigates the intrinsic, architectural origins of this failure mode through three primary contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T16:40:31Z)
• Seeing Before Reasoning: A Unified Framework for Generalizable and Explainable Fake Image Detection [58.82268659497348]
  We argue that the root of this failure lies in a fundamental mismatch: MLLMs are asked to reason about fakes before they can truly see them.<n>We propose Forensic-Chat, a generalizable, explainable, and still-conversational assistant for fake image detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T20:59:19Z)
• How Large Language Models are Designed to Hallucinate [0.42970700836450487]
  We argue that hallucination is a structural outcome of the transformer architecture.<n>Our contribution is threefold: (1) a comparative account showing why existing explanations are insufficient; (2) a predictive taxonomy of hallucination linked to existential structures with proposed benchmarks; and (3) design directions toward "truth-constrained" architectures capable of withholding or deferring when disclosure is absent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T16:46:27Z)
• On the Fundamental Impossibility of Hallucination Control in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Impossibility Theorem: no LLM performing non-trivial knowledge aggregation can simultaneously achieve truthful knowledge representation, semantic information conservation, and revelation of relevant knowledge.<n>We prove this by modeling inference as an auction of ideas, where distributed components compete to influence responses using encoded knowledge.<n>We show that hallucination and imagination are mathematically identical, and both violate at least one of the four essential properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T23:28:39Z)
• Are Reasoning Models More Prone to Hallucination? [70.04436965009072]
  Recently evolved large reasoning models (LRMs) show powerful performance in solving complex tasks with long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning capability.<n>Are reasoning models more prone to hallucination?<n>This paper addresses the question from three perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T16:53:41Z)
• Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language Models [8.97308732968526]
  We study the causality of hallucinations under constrained knowledge domains by auditing the Chain-of-Thought trajectory.<n>Our analysis reveals that in long-CoT settings, RLLMs can iteratively reinforce biases and errors through flawed reflective reasoning.<n>Surprisingly, even direct interventions at the origin of hallucinations often fail to reverse their effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T14:11:09Z)
• Waking Up an AI: A Quantitative Framework for Prompt-Induced Phase Transition in Large Language Models [0.0]
  We propose a two-part framework to investigate what underlies intuitive human thinking.<n>A form of conceptual fusion-current LLMs showed no significant difference in responsiveness between semantically fused and non-fused prompts.<n>Our method may help illuminate key differences in how intuition and conceptual leaps emerge in artificial versus human minds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T06:49:45Z)
• The Law of Knowledge Overshadowing: Towards Understanding, Predicting, and Preventing LLM Hallucination [85.18584652829799]
  We introduce a novel framework to quantify factual hallucinations by modeling knowledge overshadowing.<n>We propose a new decoding strategy CoDa, to mitigate hallucinations, which notably enhance model factuality on Overshadow (27.9%), MemoTrap (13.1%) and NQ-Swap (18.3%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T08:36:06Z)
• Think More, Hallucinate Less: Mitigating Hallucinations via Dual Process of Fast and Slow Thinking [124.69672273754144]
  HaluSearch is a novel framework that incorporates tree search-based algorithms.<n>It frames text generation as a step-by-step reasoning process.<n>We introduce a hierarchical thinking system switch mechanism inspired by the dual process theory in cognitive science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T15:36:50Z)
• AutoHallusion: Automatic Generation of Hallucination Benchmarks for Vision-Language Models [91.78328878860003]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are prone to hallucinations. benchmarks often rely on hand-crafted corner cases whose failure patterns may not generalize well. We develop AutoHallusion, the first automated benchmark generation approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T11:44:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.