Towards Error Centric Intelligence I, Beyond Observational Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15128v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 20:33:55 GMT
• Title: Towards Error Centric Intelligence I, Beyond Observational Learning
• Authors: Marcus A. Thomas,
• Abstract summary: We argue that progress toward AGI is theory limited rather than data or scale limited.<n>We begin by laying foundations, definitions of knowledge, learning, intelligence, counterfactual competence and AGI.<n>We recast the problem as three questions about how explicit and implicit errors evolve under an agent's actions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We argue that progress toward AGI is theory limited rather than data or scale limited. Building on the critical rationalism of Popper and Deutsch, we challenge the Platonic Representation Hypothesis. Observationally equivalent worlds can diverge under interventions, so observational adequacy alone cannot guarantee interventional competence. We begin by laying foundations, definitions of knowledge, learning, intelligence, counterfactual competence and AGI, and then analyze the limits of observational learning that motivate an error centric shift. We recast the problem as three questions about how explicit and implicit errors evolve under an agent's actions, which errors are unreachable within a fixed hypothesis space, and how conjecture and criticism expand that space. From these questions we propose Causal Mechanics, a mechanisms first program in which hypothesis space change is a first class operation and probabilistic structure is used when useful rather than presumed. We advance structural principles that make error discovery and correction tractable, including a differential Locality and Autonomy Principle for modular interventions, a gauge invariant form of Independent Causal Mechanisms for separability, and the Compositional Autonomy Principle for analogy preservation, together with actionable diagnostics. The aim is a scaffold for systems that can convert unreachable errors into reachable ones and correct them.

Related papers

• Theory of Space: Can Foundation Models Construct Spatial Beliefs through Active Exploration? [83.13508919229939]
  Theory of Space is defined as an agent's ability to actively acquire information through self-directed, active exploration.<n>A key innovation is spatial belief probing, which prompts models to reveal their internal spatial representations at each step.<n>Our findings suggest that current foundation models struggle to maintain coherent, revisable spatial beliefs during active exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T19:06:40Z)
• Towards Error-Centric Intelligence II: Energy-Structured Causal Models [0.0]
  We argue for a conceptual reorientation: intelligence is the ability to build and refine explanations.<n>This paper offers a formal language for causal reasoning in systems that aspire to understand, not merely to predict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T22:19:17Z)
• Newton to Einstein: Axiom-Based Discovery via Game Design [55.30047000068118]
  We propose a game design framework in which scientific inquiry is recast as a rule-evolving system.<n>Unlike conventional ML approaches that operate within fixed assumptions, our method enables the discovery of new theoretical structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T18:59:18Z)
• Controllable Logical Hypothesis Generation for Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs [54.596180382762036]
  Abductive reasoning in knowledge graphs aims to generate plausible logical hypotheses from observed entities.<n>Due to a lack of controllability, a single observation may yield numerous plausible but redundant or irrelevant hypotheses.<n>We introduce the task of controllable hypothesis generation to improve the practical utility of abductive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T09:36:47Z)
• Causal Inference Isn't Special: Why It's Just Another Prediction Problem [1.90365714903665]
  Causal inference is often portrayed as distinct from predictive modeling.<n>But at its core, causal inference is simply a structured instance of prediction under distribution shift.<n>This perspective reframes causal estimation as a familiar generalization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T01:37:50Z)
• "Cause" is Mechanistic Narrative within Scientific Domains: An Ordinary Language Philosophical Critique of "Causal Machine Learning" [2.5782973781085383]
  Causal Learning has emerged as a major theme of research in statistics and machine learning.<n>In this paper we consider recognizing true cause and effect phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T10:36:26Z)
• On the Joint Interaction of Models, Data, and Features [82.60073661644435]
  We introduce a new tool, the interaction tensor, for empirically analyzing the interaction between data and model through features. Based on these observations, we propose a conceptual framework for feature learning. Under this framework, the expected accuracy for a single hypothesis and agreement for a pair of hypotheses can both be derived in closed-form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T21:35:26Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Towards a Grounded Theory of Causation for Embodied AI [12.259552039796027]
  Existing frameworks give no indication as to which behaviour policies or physical transformations of state space shall count as interventions. The framework sketched in this paper describes actions as transformations of state space, for instance induced by an agent running a policy. This makes it possible to describe in a uniform way both transformations of the micro-state space and abstract models thereof.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T12:56:43Z)
• Discovering Latent Causal Variables via Mechanism Sparsity: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICA [81.4991350761909]
  Independent component analysis (ICA) refers to an ensemble of methods which formalize this goal and provide estimation procedure for practical application. We show that the latent variables can be recovered up to a permutation if one regularizes the latent mechanisms to be sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-21T14:22:14Z)
• Fundamental Limits and Tradeoffs in Invariant Representation Learning [99.2368462915979]
  Many machine learning applications involve learning representations that achieve two competing goals. Minimax game-theoretic formulation represents a fundamental tradeoff between accuracy and invariance. We provide an information-theoretic analysis of this general and important problem under both classification and regression settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T15:24:04Z)
• No Substitute for Functionalism -- A Reply to 'Falsification & Consciousness' [0.0]
  This reply identifies avenues of expansion for the model proposed in [1], allowing us to distinguish between different types of variation. Motivated by examples from neural networks, state machines and Turing machines, we will prove that substitutions do not exist for a very broad class of Level-1 functionalist theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T08:12:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.