The Neuroticism Paradox: How Emotional Instability Fuels Collective Feelings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16046v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:19:57 GMT
• Title: The Neuroticism Paradox: How Emotional Instability Fuels Collective Feelings
• Authors: Xiao Sun,
• Abstract summary: We analyze a 30.5-month longitudinal dataset of daily emotions from 38 colocated professionals.<n>We find that emotionally unstable individuals are "emotional superspreaders"<n>This "Neuroticism Paradox" reveals that emotional volatility, not stability, drives contagion.
• Score: 4.975899099577257
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Collective emotions shape organizations, communities, and societies, yet the traits that determine who drives them remain unknown. Conventional wisdom holds that stable, extraverted individuals act as emotional leaders, calming and coordinating the feelings of others. Here we challenge this view by analyzing a 30.5-month longitudinal dataset of daily emotions from 38 co-located professionals (733,534 records). Using Granger-causality network reconstruction, we find that emotionally unstable individuals -- those high in neuroticism (r = 0.478, p = 0.002) and low in conscientiousness (r = -0.512, p = 0.001) -- are the true "emotional super-spreaders," while extraversion shows no effect (r = 0.238, p = 0.150). This "Neuroticism Paradox" reveals that emotional volatility, not stability, drives contagion. Emotions propagate with a reproduction rate (R_0 = 15.58) comparable to measles, yet the system avoids collapse through high clustering (C = 0.705) that creates "emotional quarantine zones." Emotional variance increased 22.9% over time, contradicting homeostasis theories and revealing entropy-driven dynamics. We propose an Affective Epidemiology framework showing that collective emotions are governed by network position and volatility rather than personality stability -- transforming how we understand emotional leadership in human systems.

Related papers

• Technosocial risks of ideal emotion recognition technologies: A defense of the (social) value of emotional expressions [51.56484100374058]
  I argue that the appeal of such systems rests on a misunderstanding of the social functions emotional expression.<n>ERTs threaten this expressive space by collapsing epistemic friction, displacing meaning with technology-mediated affective profiles, and narrowing the space for aspirational and role-sensitive expressions.<n>I argue that, although it is intuitive to think that increasing accuracy would legitimise such systems, in the case of ERTs accuracy does not straightforwardly justify their deployment, and may, in some contexts, provide a reason for regulatory restraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T14:20:42Z)
• Sentipolis: Emotion-Aware Agents for Social Simulations [27.051352819823524]
  Sentipolis is a framework for emotionally stateful agents for social simulation.<n>It integrates Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance representation, dual-speed emotion dynamics, and emotion--memory coupling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T22:50:04Z)
• WELD: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Dataset of Emotional Dynamics for Ubiquitous Affective Computing [4.975899099577257]
  We present a novel dataset comprising 733,651 facial expression records from 38 employees collected over 30.5 months in an authentic office environment.<n>Each record contains seven emotion probabilities derived from deep learning-based facial expression recognition.<n>The dataset uniquely spans the COVID-19 pandemic period, capturing emotional responses to major societal events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T00:59:43Z)
• Do LLMs "Feel"? Emotion Circuits Discovery and Control [54.57583855608979]
  We study the internal mechanisms that give rise to emotional expression and in controlling emotions in generated text.<n>This is the first systematic study to uncover and validate emotion circuits in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T12:24:24Z)
• Wrong Face, Wrong Move: The Social Dynamics of Emotion Misperception in Agent-Based Models [2.0221069271989305]
  The ability of humans to detect and respond to others' emotions is fundamental to understanding social behavior.<n>Here, agents are instantiated with emotion classifiers of varying accuracy to study the impact of perceptual accuracy on emergent emotional and spatial behavior.<n>Results show that low-accuracy classifiers reliably result in diminished trust, emotional disintegration into sadness, and disordered social organization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T22:42:46Z)
• Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models [75.85319609088354]
  Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE) is an evaluation framework for large language models.<n>SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction.<n>SAGE provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:06:10Z)
• Language and Mental Health: Measures of Emotion Dynamics from Text as Linguistic Biosocial Markers [30.656554495536618]
  We study the relationship between tweet emotion dynamics and mental health disorders. We find that each of the UED metrics studied varied by the user's self-disclosed diagnosis. This work provides important early evidence for how linguistic cues pertaining to emotion dynamics can play a crucial role as biosocial markers for mental illnesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T13:00:26Z)
• Why Do You Feel This Way? Summarizing Triggers of Emotions in Social Media Posts [61.723046082145416]
  We introduce CovidET (Emotions and their Triggers during Covid-19), a dataset of 1,900 English Reddit posts related to COVID-19. We develop strong baselines to jointly detect emotions and summarize emotion triggers. Our analyses show that CovidET presents new challenges in emotion-specific summarization, as well as multi-emotion detection in long social media posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T19:10:26Z)
• Emotions as abstract evaluation criteria in biological and artificial intelligences [0.0]
  We propose a framework which mimics emotions on a functional level. Based on time allocation via emotional stationarity (TAES), emotions are implemented as abstract criteria. The long-term goal of the agent, to align experience with character, is achieved by optimizing the frequency for selecting individual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T10:49:04Z)
• A Circular-Structured Representation for Visual Emotion Distribution Learning [82.89776298753661]
  We propose a well-grounded circular-structured representation to utilize the prior knowledge for visual emotion distribution learning. To be specific, we first construct an Emotion Circle to unify any emotional state within it. On the proposed Emotion Circle, each emotion distribution is represented with an emotion vector, which is defined with three attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T14:53:27Z)
• MIME: MIMicking Emotions for Empathetic Response Generation [82.57304533143756]
  Current approaches to empathetic response generation view the set of emotions expressed in the input text as a flat structure. We argue that empathetic responses often mimic the emotion of the user to a varying degree, depending on its positivity or negativity and content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T00:35:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.