Do What You Say: Steering Vision-Language-Action Models via Runtime Reasoning-Action Alignment Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16281v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 00:38:45 GMT
• Title: Do What You Say: Steering Vision-Language-Action Models via Runtime Reasoning-Action Alignment Verification
• Authors: Yilin Wu, Anqi Li, Tucker Hermans, Fabio Ramos, Andrea Bajcsy, Claudia P'erez-D'Arpino,
• Abstract summary: Reasoning Vision Language Action (VLA) models improve robotic instruction-following by generating step-by-step textual plans before low-level actions.<n>But even with a correct textual plan, the generated actions can still miss the intended outcomes in the plan, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.<n>We formalize this phenomenon as a lack of embodied CoT faithfulness, and introduce a training-free, runtime policy steering method for reasoning-action alignment.
• Score: 17.948161564138033
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reasoning Vision Language Action (VLA) models improve robotic instruction-following by generating step-by-step textual plans before low-level actions, an approach inspired by Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in language models. Yet even with a correct textual plan, the generated actions can still miss the intended outcomes in the plan, especially in out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. We formalize this phenomenon as a lack of embodied CoT faithfulness, and introduce a training-free, runtime policy steering method for reasoning-action alignment. Given a reasoning VLA's intermediate textual plan, our framework samples multiple candidate action sequences from the same model, predicts their outcomes via simulation, and uses a pre-trained Vision-Language Model (VLM) to select the sequence whose outcome best aligns with the VLA's own textual plan. Only executing action sequences that align with the textual reasoning turns our base VLA's natural action diversity from a source of error into a strength, boosting robustness to semantic and visual OOD perturbations and enabling novel behavior composition without costly re-training. We also contribute a reasoning-annotated extension of LIBERO-100, environment variations tailored for OOD evaluation, and demonstrate up to 15% performance gain over prior work on behavior composition tasks and scales with compute and data diversity. Project Website at: https://yilin-wu98.github.io/steering-reasoning-vla/

Related papers

• LangForce: Bayesian Decomposition of Vision Language Action Models via Latent Action Queries [30.732526921367835]
  LangForce is a novel framework that enforces instruction following via Bayesian decomposition.<n>We show that LangForce significantly improves generalization without requiring new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T17:15:22Z)
• Seeing to Act, Prompting to Specify: A Bayesian Factorization of Vision Language Action Policy [59.44168425139687]
  BayesVLA is a Bayesian factorization that decomposes the policy into a visual-action prior, supporting seeing-to-act, and a language-conditioned likelihood, enabling prompt-to-specify.<n>Experiments show superior generalization to unseen instructions, objects, and environments compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T01:59:23Z)
• IntentionVLA: Generalizable and Efficient Embodied Intention Reasoning for Human-Robot Interaction [51.130510883952546]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models leverage pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) to couple perception with robotic control.<n>We propose textbfIntentionVLA, a VLA framework with a curriculum training paradigm and an efficient inference mechanism.<n>Our proposed method first leverages carefully designed reasoning data that combine intention inference, spatial grounding, and compact embodied reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:49:46Z)
• Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible [53.40183895299108]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance on a range of robotic tasks.<n>We propose Instruct-Verify-and-Act (IVA), a framework that detects when an instruction cannot be executed due to a false premise.<n>Our experiments show that IVA improves false premise detection accuracy by 97.56% over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T10:54:33Z)
• CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Models [89.44024245194315]
  We introduce a method that incorporates explicit visual chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning into vision-language-action models (VLAs)<n>We introduce CoT-VLA, a state-of-the-art 7B VLA that can understand and generate visual and action tokens.<n>Our experimental results demonstrate that CoT-VLA achieves strong performance, outperforming the state-of-the-art VLA model by 17% in real-world manipulation tasks and 6% in simulation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T22:23:04Z)
• VIPER: Visual Perception and Explainable Reasoning for Sequential Decision-Making [17.313485392764353]
  VIPER is a novel framework for multimodal instruction-based planning.<n>It integrates VLM-based perception with LLM-based reasoning.<n>We show that VIPER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art visual instruction-based planners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T11:05:42Z)
• HybridVLA: Collaborative Diffusion and Autoregression in a Unified Vision-Language-Action Model [54.64088247291416]
  A fundamental objective of manipulation policy design is to endow robots to comprehend human instructions, reason about scene cues, and execute generalized actions in dynamic environments.<n>Recent autoregressive vision-language-action (VLA) methods inherit common-sense reasoning capabilities from vision-language models (VLMs) for next action-token prediction.<n>We introduce HybridVLA, a unified framework that absorbs the continuous nature of diffusion-based actions and the contextual reasoning of autoregression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T17:59:52Z)
• Instruction Position Matters in Sequence Generation with Large Language Models [67.87516654892343]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of performing conditional sequence generation tasks, such as translation or summarization. We propose enhancing the instruction-following capability of LLMs by shifting the position of task instructions after the input sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T12:36:57Z)
• Few-shot Subgoal Planning with Language Models [58.11102061150875]
  We show that language priors encoded in pre-trained language models allow us to infer fine-grained subgoal sequences. In contrast to recent methods which make strong assumptions about subgoal supervision, our experiments show that language models can infer detailed subgoal sequences without any fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T01:03:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.