The Sherpa.ai Blind Vertical Federated Learning Paradigm to Minimize the Number of Communications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17901v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 10:27:07 GMT
• Title: The Sherpa.ai Blind Vertical Federated Learning Paradigm to Minimize the Number of Communications
• Authors: Alex Acero, Daniel M. Jimenez-Gutierrez, Dario Pighin, Enrique Zuazua, Joaquin Del Rio, Xabi Uribe-Etxebarria,
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative decentralized training across multiple parties (nodes) while keeping raw data private.<n>Sherpa.ai Blind Vertical Federated Learning (SBVFL) is a novel paradigm that leverages a distributed training mechanism enhanced for privacy and security.<n>SBVFL enables practical, privacy-preserving VFL across sensitive domains, including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, aerospace, cybersecurity, and the defense industry.
• Score: 0.09578151054169785
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative decentralized training across multiple parties (nodes) while keeping raw data private. There are two main paradigms in FL: Horizontal FL (HFL), where all participant nodes share the same feature space but hold different samples, and Vertical FL (VFL), where participants hold complementary features for the same samples. While HFL is widely adopted, VFL is employed in domains where nodes hold complementary features about the same samples. Still, VFL presents a significant limitation: the vast number of communications required during training. This compromises privacy and security, and can lead to high energy consumption, and in some cases, make model training unfeasible due to the high number of communications. In this paper, we introduce Sherpa.ai Blind Vertical Federated Learning (SBVFL), a novel paradigm that leverages a distributed training mechanism enhanced for privacy and security. Decoupling the vast majority of node updates from the server dramatically reduces node-server communication. Experiments show that SBVFL reduces communication by ~99% compared to standard VFL while maintaining accuracy and robustness. Therefore, SBVFL enables practical, privacy-preserving VFL across sensitive domains, including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, aerospace, cybersecurity, and the defense industry.

Related papers

• FuseFL: One-Shot Federated Learning through the Lens of Causality with Progressive Model Fusion [48.90879664138855]
  One-shot Federated Learning (OFL) significantly reduces communication costs in FL by aggregating trained models only once. However, the performance of advanced OFL methods is far behind the normal FL. We propose a novel learning approach to endow OFL with superb performance and low communication and storage costs, termed as FuseFL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T09:07:10Z)
• SpaFL: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sparse Models and Low computational Overhead [75.87007729801304]
  SpaFL: a communication-efficient FL framework is proposed to optimize sparse model structures with low computational overhead.<n>To optimize the pruning process itself, only thresholds are communicated between a server and clients instead of parameters.<n>Global thresholds are used to update model parameters by extracting aggregated parameter importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T13:10:35Z)
• Decoupled Vertical Federated Learning for Practical Training on Vertically Partitioned Data [8.759583928626702]
  We propose Decoupled VFL (DVFL) to handle training with faults.<n>DVFL decouples training between communication rounds using local unsupervised objectives.<n>As secondary benefits, DVFL can enhance data efficiency and provides immunity against gradient-based attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T17:23:28Z)
• Communication Efficient ConFederated Learning: An Event-Triggered SAGA Approach [67.27031215756121]
  Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning paradigm that targets model training without gathering the local data over various data sources. Standard FL, which employs a single server, can only support a limited number of users, leading to degraded learning capability. In this work, we consider a multi-server FL framework, referred to as emphConfederated Learning (CFL) in order to accommodate a larger number of users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T03:27:10Z)
• Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspective [45.81975053649379]
  Decentralized FL (DFL) is a decentralized network architecture that eliminates the need for a central server. DFL enables direct communication between clients, resulting in significant savings in communication resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T15:12:58Z)
• BadVFL: Backdoor Attacks in Vertical Federated Learning [22.71527711053385]
  Federated learning (FL) enables multiple parties to collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing their data. In this paper, we focus on robustness in VFL, in particular, on backdoor attacks. We present a first-of-its-kind clean-label backdoor attack in VFL, which consists of two phases: a label inference and a backdoor phase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T09:22:32Z)
• Vertical Federated Learning: Taxonomies, Threats, and Prospects [22.487434998185773]
  Federated learning (FL) is the most popular distributed machine learning technique. FL can be divided into horizontal federated learning (HFL) and vertical federated learning (VFL) VFL is more relevant than HFL as different companies hold different features for the same set of customers. Although VFL is an emerging area of research, it is not well-established compared to HFL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T05:13:40Z)
• How Much Does It Cost to Train a Machine Learning Model over Distributed Data Sources? [4.222078489059043]
  Federated learning allows devices to train a machine learning model without sharing their raw data. Server-less FL approaches like gossip federated learning (GFL) and blockchain-enabled federated learning (BFL) have been proposed to mitigate these issues. GFL is able to save the 18% of training time, the 68% of energy and the 51% of data to be shared with respect to the CFL solution, but it is not able to reach the level of accuracy of CFL. BFL represents a viable solution for implementing decentralized learning with a higher level of security, at the cost of an extra energy usage and data sharing
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T08:13:40Z)
• Desirable Companion for Vertical Federated Learning: New Zeroth-Order Gradient Based Algorithm [140.25480610981504]
  A complete list of metrics to evaluate VFL algorithms should include model applicability, privacy, communication, and computation efficiency. We propose a novel VFL framework with black-box scalability, which is inseparably inseparably scalable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T13:55:47Z)
• Achieving Personalized Federated Learning with Sparse Local Models [75.76854544460981]
  Federated learning (FL) is vulnerable to heterogeneously distributed data. To counter this issue, personalized FL (PFL) was proposed to produce dedicated local models for each individual user. Existing PFL solutions either demonstrate unsatisfactory generalization towards different model architectures or cost enormous extra computation and memory. We proposeFedSpa, a novel PFL scheme that employs personalized sparse masks to customize sparse local models on the edge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T08:43:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.