DIP-AI: A Discovery Framework for AI Innovation Projects
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18017v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:48:29 GMT
- Title: DIP-AI: A Discovery Framework for AI Innovation Projects
- Abstract summary: This research contributes to academia by sharing DIP-AI as a framework for AI problem discovery.<n>For industry, we discuss the use of this framework in a real IAC program that develops AI innovation projects.
- Score: 1.3704574906282525
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite the increasing development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, Requirements Engineering (RE) activities face challenges in this new data-intensive paradigm. We identified a lack of support for problem discovery within AI innovation projects. To address this, we propose and evaluate DIP-AI, a discovery framework tailored to guide early-stage exploration in such initiatives. Based on a literature review, our solution proposal combines elements of ISO 12207, 5338, and Design Thinking to support the discovery of AI innovation projects, aiming at promoting higher quality deliveries and stakeholder satisfaction. We evaluated DIP-AI in an industry-academia collaboration (IAC) case study of an AI innovation project, in which participants applied DIP-AI to the discovery phase in practice and provided their perceptions about the approach's problem discovery capability, acceptance, and suggestions. The results indicate that DIP-AI is relevant and useful, particularly in facilitating problem discovery in AI projects. This research contributes to academia by sharing DIP-AI as a framework for AI problem discovery. For industry, we discuss the use of this framework in a real IAC program that develops AI innovation projects.
Related papers
- A systematic review of generative AI usage for IT project management [0.0]
This paper synthesizes current knowledge on generative AI in IT project management using the PRISMA methodology.<n>It identifies and discusses three promising research directions for AI-enabled project management, including process group-specific AI agents, project role-based AI agents, and hybrid collaborative networks that enable human-guided orchestration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T11:10:37Z) - Advancing AI Challenges for the United States Department of the Air Force [91.02589169578908]
The DAF-MIT AI Accelerator is a collaboration between the United States Department of the Air Force (DAF) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)<n>This article supplements our previous publication, which introduced AI Accelerator challenges.<n>We provide an update on how ongoing and new challenges have successfully contributed to AI research and applications of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T21:34:57Z) - AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z) - Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences (October 2025 -- Version 2) [49.142289900583705]
We review the increased erosion of trust in AI research outputs, driven by the issues of poor reusability.<n>We discuss the fragmented components of the AI ecosystem and lack of guiding pathways to best support Open and Sustainable AI.<n>Our work connects researchers with relevant AI resources, facilitating the implementation of sustainable, reusable and transparent AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T12:52:34Z) - Engineering Artificial Intelligence: Framework, Challenges, and Future Direction [0.2678472239880052]
This paper introduces the "ABCDE" as the key elements of Engineering AI.<n>It proposes a unified, systematic engineering AI ecosystem framework.<n>By providing a comprehensive perspective, this paper aims to advance the strategic implementation of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-03T04:30:10Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - From Google Gemini to OpenAI Q* (Q-Star): A Survey of Reshaping the
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Landscape [5.852005817069381]
The study critically examined the current state and future trajectory of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
It explored how innovations like Google's Gemini and the anticipated OpenAI Q* project are reshaping research priorities and applications across various domains.
The study highlighted the importance of incorporating ethical and human-centric methods in AI development, ensuring alignment with societal norms and welfare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T01:11:39Z) - Investigating Responsible AI for Scientific Research: An Empirical Study [4.597781832707524]
The push for Responsible AI (RAI) in such institutions underscores the increasing emphasis on integrating ethical considerations within AI design and development.
This paper aims to assess the awareness and preparedness regarding the ethical risks inherent in AI design and development.
Our results have revealed certain knowledge gaps concerning ethical, responsible, and inclusive AI, with limitations in awareness of the available AI ethics frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T06:40:27Z) - Assessing AI Impact Assessments: A Classroom Study [14.768235460961876]
Artificial Intelligence Impact Assessments ("AIIAs"), a family of tools that provide structured processes to imagine the possible impacts of a proposed AI system, have become an increasingly popular proposal to govern AI systems.
Recent efforts from government or private-sector organizations have proposed many diverse instantiations of AIIAs, which take a variety of forms ranging from open-ended questionnaires to graded score-cards.
We conduct a classroom study at a large research-intensive university (R1) in an elective course focused on the societal and ethical implications of AI.
We find preliminary evidence that impact assessments can influence participants' perceptions of the potential
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T01:00:59Z) - Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and
Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices.
Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Progressing Towards Responsible AI [2.191505742658975]
Observatory on Society and Artificial Intelligence (OSAI) grew out of the project AI4EU.
OSAI aims to stimulate reflection on a broad spectrum of issues of AI (ethical, legal, social, economic and cultural)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-11T09:46:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.