On Controlled Change: Generative AI's Impact on Professional Authority in Journalism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19792v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:27:32 GMT
• Title: On Controlled Change: Generative AI's Impact on Professional Authority in Journalism
• Authors: Tomás Dodds, Wang Ngai Yeung, Claudia Mellado, Mathias-Felipe de Lima-Santos,
• Abstract summary: Using (generative) artificial intelligence tools and systems in journalism is expected to increase journalists' production rates.<n>This paper examines how journalists in Dutch media manage the integration of AI technologies into their daily routines.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Using (generative) artificial intelligence tools and systems in journalism is expected to increase journalists' production rates, transform newsrooms' economic models, and further personalize the audience's news consumption practices. Since its release in 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT and other large language models have raised the alarms inside news organizations, not only for bringing new challenges to news reporting and fact-checking but also for what these technologies would mean for journalists' professional authority in journalism. This paper examines how journalists in Dutch media manage the integration of AI technologies into their daily routines. Drawing from 13 interviews with editors, journalists, and innovation managers in different news outlets and media companies, we propose the concept of controlled change. as a heuristic to explain how journalists are proactively setting guidelines, experimenting with AI tools, and identifying their limitations and capabilities. Using professional authority as a theoretical framework, we argue that journalists anticipate and integrate AI technologies in a supervised manner and identify three primary mechanisms through which journalists manage this integration: (1) developing adaptive guidelines that align AI use with ethical codes, (2) experimenting with AI technologies to determine their necessity and fit, and (3) critically assessing the capabilities and limitations of AI systems.

Related papers

• They Think AI Can Do More Than It Actually Can: Practices, Challenges, & Opportunities of AI-Supported Reporting In Local Journalism [13.52144719653642]
  Findings: Local journalists do not fully leverage AI's potential to support data-related work.<n>Despite local journalists' limited awareness of AI's capabilities, they are willing to use it to process data and discover stories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T11:25:31Z)
• Can Media Act as a Soft Regulator of Safe AI Development? A Game Theoretical Analysis [57.68073583427415]
  We study whether media coverage has the potential to push AI creators into the production of safe products.<n>Our results reveal that media is indeed able to foster cooperation between creators and users, but not always.<n>By shaping public perception and holding developers accountable, media emerges as a powerful soft regulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T12:13:34Z)
• How can AI agents support journalists' work? An experiment with designing an LLM-driven intelligent reporting system [0.0]
  The integration of artificial intelligence into journalistic practices represents a transformative shift in how news is gathered, analyzed, and disseminated.<n>Large language models (LLMs), particularly those with agentic capabilities, offer unprecedented opportunities for enhancing journalistic practices.<n>This research explores how agentic LLMs can support journalists' filtering, based on insights from journalist interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T14:56:59Z)
• Must Read: A Systematic Survey of Computational Persuasion [60.83151988635103]
  AI-driven persuasion can be leveraged for beneficial applications, but also poses threats through manipulation and unethical influence.<n>Our survey outlines future research directions to enhance the safety, fairness, and effectiveness of AI-powered persuasion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T17:26:31Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025 [39.08798007138432]
  New in this year's report are in-depth analyses of the evolving landscape of AI hardware, novel estimates of inference costs.<n>We also introduce fresh data on corporate adoption of responsible AI practices.<n>The AI Index has been cited in major media outlets such as The New York Times, Bloomberg, and The Guardian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T02:01:37Z)
• From Trust to Truth: Actionable policies for the use of AI in fact-checking in Germany and Ukraine [0.081585306387285]
  The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges for journalism, fact-checking and media regulation.<n>While AI offers tools to combat disinformation and enhance media practices, its unregulated use and associated risks necessitate clear policies and collaborative efforts.<n>This policy paper explores the implications of AI for journalism and fact-checking, with a focus on addressing disinformation and fostering responsible AI integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T14:34:00Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Bridging the Communication Gap: Evaluating AI Labeling Practices for Trustworthy AI Development [41.64451715899638]
  High-level AI labels, inspired by frameworks like EU energy labels, have been proposed to make the properties of AI models more transparent.<n>This study evaluates AI labeling through qualitative interviews along four key research questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T06:00:14Z)
• "It Might be Technically Impressive, But It's Practically Useless to us": Motivations, Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for Cross-Functional Collaboration around AI within the News Industry [7.568817736131254]
  This study investigates the practices, challenges, and opportunities for internal cross-functional collaboration around AI in news industry.<n>We interviewed 17 journalists, six AI technologists, and three AI workers with cross-functional experience from leading Chinese news organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T14:12:01Z)
• Willingness to Read AI-Generated News Is Not Driven by Their Perceived Quality [3.036383058306671]
  This study investigates the perceived quality of AI-assisted and AI-generated versus human-generated news articles.<n>It also investigates whether disclosure of AI's involvement in generating these news articles influences engagement with them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T13:12:16Z)
• Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media [0.0]
  This study analyzes 37 AI guidelines for media purposes in 17 countries. Our analysis reveals key thematic areas, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and the preservation of journalistic values. Results highlight shared principles and best practices that emerge from these guidelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T22:47:56Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.