E-Test: E'er-Improving Test Suites

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19860v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:23:33 GMT
• Title: E-Test: E'er-Improving Test Suites
• Authors: Ketai Qiu, Luca Di Grazia, Leonardo Mariani, Mauro Pezzè,
• Abstract summary: E-Test identifies executions that have not yet been tested from large sets of scenarios.<n>It generates new test cases that enhance the test suite.<n>E-Test retrieves not-yet-tested execution scenarios significantly better than state-of-the-art approaches.
• Score: 8.585182075116336
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Test suites are inherently imperfect, and testers can always enrich a suite with new test cases that improve its quality and, consequently, the reliability of the target software system. However, finding test cases that explore execution scenarios beyond the scope of an existing suite can be extremely challenging and labor-intensive, particularly when managing large test suites over extended periods. In this paper, we propose E-Test, an approach that reduces the gap between the execution space explored with a test suite and the executions experienced after testing by augmenting the test suite with test cases that explore execution scenarios that emerge in production. E-Test (i) identifies executions that have not yet been tested from large sets of scenarios, such as those monitored during intensive production usage, and (ii) generates new test cases that enhance the test suite. E-Test leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to pinpoint scenarios that the current test suite does not adequately cover, and augments the suite with test cases that execute these scenarios. Our evaluation on a dataset of 1,975 scenarios, collected from highly-starred open-source Java projects already in production and Defects4J, demonstrates that E-Test retrieves not-yet-tested execution scenarios significantly better than state-of-the-art approaches. While existing regression testing and field testing approaches for this task achieve a maximum F1-score of 0.34, and vanilla LLMs achieve a maximum F1-score of 0.39, E-Test reaches 0.55. These results highlight the impact of E-Test in enhancing test suites by effectively targeting not-yet-tested execution scenarios and reducing manual effort required for maintaining test suites.

Related papers

• Intention-Driven Generation of Project-Specific Test Cases [45.2380093475221]
  We propose IntentionTest, which generates project-specific tests given the description of validation intention.<n>We extensively evaluate IntentionTest against state-of-the-art baselines (DA, ChatTester, and EvoSuite) on 4,146 test cases from 13 open-source projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T08:35:04Z)
• Ever-Improving Test Suite by Leveraging Large Language Models [0.0]
  Augmenting test suites with test cases that reflect the actual usage of the software system is extremely important to sustain the quality of long lasting software systems.<n>E-Test is an approach that incrementally augments a test suite with test cases that exercise behaviors that emerge in production and that are not been tested yet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T13:38:25Z)
• Studying the Impact of Early Test Termination Due to Assertion Failure on Code Coverage and Spectrum-based Fault Localization [48.22524837906857]
  This study is the first empirical study on early test termination due to assertion failure.<n>We investigated 207 versions of 6 open-source projects.<n>Our findings indicate that early test termination harms both code coverage and the effectiveness of spectrum-based fault localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T17:14:09Z)
• ProjectTest: A Project-level LLM Unit Test Generation Benchmark and Impact of Error Fixing Mechanisms [48.43237545197775]
  Unit test generation has become a promising and important use case of LLMs.<n>ProjectTest is a project-level benchmark for unit test generation covering Python, Java, and JavaScript.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T15:24:30Z)
• TestGenEval: A Real World Unit Test Generation and Test Completion Benchmark [24.14654309612826]
  TestGenEval comprises 68,647 tests from 1,210 code and test file pairs across 11 well-maintained Python repositories.<n>It covers initial tests authoring, test suite completion, and code coverage improvements.<n>We evaluate several popular models, with sizes ranging from 7B to 405B parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T14:47:05Z)
• Do Test and Environmental Complexity Increase Flakiness? An Empirical Study of SAP HANA [47.29324864511411]
  Flaky tests fail seemingly at random without changes to the code. We study characteristics of tests and the test environment that potentially impact test flakiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T07:52:09Z)
• A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites [1.4563527353943984]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development. We present AgoneTest: an automated system for generating test suites for Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T23:02:16Z)
• Observation-based unit test generation at Meta [52.4716552057909]
  TestGen automatically generates unit tests, carved from serialized observations of complex objects, observed during app execution. TestGen has landed 518 tests into production, which have been executed 9,617,349 times in continuous integration, finding 5,702 faults. Our evaluation reveals that, when carving its observations from 4,361 reliable end-to-end tests, TestGen was able to generate tests for at least 86% of the classes covered by end-to-end tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T00:34:39Z)
• Towards Automatic Generation of Amplified Regression Test Oracles [44.45138073080198]
  We propose a test oracle derivation approach to amplify regression test oracles. The approach monitors the object state during test execution and compares it to the previous version to detect any changes in relation to the SUT's intended behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T12:38:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.