A Unified Framework for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20542v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:30:26 GMT
• Title: A Unified Framework for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Jacopo Di Ventura, Jan Felix Kleuker, Aske Plaat, Thomas Moerland,
• Abstract summary: Zero-shot reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a setting for developing general agents in an unsupervised manner.<n>Despite growing interest, the field lacks a common analytical lens.<n>We present the first unified framework for zero-shot RL.
• Score: 0.2951541543732647
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Zero-shot reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a setting for developing general agents in an unsupervised manner, capable of solving downstream tasks without additional training or planning at test-time. Unlike conventional RL, which optimizes policies for a fixed reward, zero-shot RL requires agents to encode representations rich enough to support immediate adaptation to any objective, drawing parallels to vision and language foundation models. Despite growing interest, the field lacks a common analytical lens. We present the first unified framework for zero-shot RL. Our formulation introduces a consistent notation and taxonomy that organizes existing approaches and allows direct comparison between them. Central to our framework is the classification of algorithms into two families: direct representations, which learn end-to-end mappings from rewards to policies, and compositional representations, which decompose the representation leveraging the substructure of the value function. Within this framework, we highlight shared principles and key differences across methods, and we derive an extended bound for successor-feature methods, offering a new perspective on their performance in the zero-shot regime. By consolidating existing work under a common lens, our framework provides a principled foundation for future research in zero-shot RL and outlines a clear path toward developing more general agents.

Related papers

• Towards Robust Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning [22.262048244005296]
  Recent development of zero-shot reinforcement learning (RL) has opened a new avenue for learning pre-trained generalist policies that can adapt to arbitrary new tasks in a zero-shot manner.<n>While the popular Forward-Backward representations (FB) and related methods have shown promise in zero-shot RL, we empirically found that their modeling lacks expressivity and that extrapolation errors caused suboptimal performance.<n>We propose an upgraded FB-based framework that simultaneously enhances learning stability, policy extraction capability, and representation learning quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T07:33:19Z)
• Group-Relative REINFORCE Is Secretly an Off-Policy Algorithm: Demystifying Some Myths About GRPO and Its Friends [64.71326476563213]
  Off-policy reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs) is attracting growing interest.<n>We present a first-principles derivation for grouprelative REINFORCE without assuming a specific training data distribution.<n>This perspective yields two general principles for adapting REINFORCE to off-policy settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T02:34:54Z)
• The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey [103.32591749156416]
  The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL)<n>This survey formalizes this conceptual shift by contrasting the degenerate single-step Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) of LLM-RL with the temporally extended, partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) that define Agentic RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T17:46:26Z)
• Reinforcement Learning in Vision: A Survey [36.820183535103695]
  This survey offers a critical and up-to-date synthesis of the field.<n>We first formalize visual RL problems and trace the evolution of policy-optimization strategies.<n>We distill trends such as curriculum-driven training, preference-aligned diffusion, and unified reward modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T17:08:55Z)
• Affordance-R1: Reinforcement Learning for Generalizable Affordance Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Model [23.56313087226691]
  Affordance grounding focuses on predicting the specific regions of objects that are associated with the actions to be performed by robots.<n>Existing models often neglect the affordance shared among different objects because they lack the Chain-of-Thought(CoT) reasoning abilities.<n>We propose Affordance-R1, the first unified affordance grounding framework that integrates cognitive CoT guided Group Relative Policy Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T10:39:04Z)
• DINO-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Vision Foundation Models [18.06361678575107]
  We propose textbfDINO-R1, the first attempt to incentivize visual in-context reasoning capabilities of vision foundation models.<n>DINO-R1 introduces textbfGroup Relative Query Optimization (GRQO), a novel reinforcement-style training strategy.<n>Experiments on COCO, LVIS, and ODinW demonstrate that DINO-R1 significantly outperforms supervised fine-tuning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:58:06Z)
• Delving into RL for Image Generation with CoT: A Study on DPO vs. GRPO [68.44918104224818]
  Autoregressive image generation presents unique challenges distinct from Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.<n>This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of the GRPO and DPO algorithms in autoregressive image generation.<n>Our findings reveal that GRPO and DPO exhibit distinct advantages, and crucially, that reward models possessing stronger intrinsic generalization capabilities potentially enhance the generalization potential of the applied RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:59:49Z)
• A Unifying Framework for Action-Conditional Self-Predictive Reinforcement Learning [48.59516337905877]
  Learning a good representation is a crucial challenge for Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. Recent work has developed theoretical insights into these algorithms. We take a step towards bridging the gap between theory and practice by analyzing an action-conditional self-predictive objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T07:22:12Z)
• Towards an Information Theoretic Framework of Context-Based Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning [48.79569442193824]
  We show that COMRL algorithms are essentially optimizing the same mutual information objective between the task variable $M$ and its latent representation $Z$ by implementing various approximate bounds.<n>As demonstrations, we propose a supervised and a self-supervised implementation of $I(Z; M)$, and empirically show that the corresponding optimization algorithms exhibit remarkable generalization across a broad spectrum of RL benchmarks.<n>This work lays the information theoretic foundation for COMRL methods, leading to a better understanding of task representation learning in the context of reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T09:58:42Z)
• Variational Empowerment as Representation Learning for Goal-Based Reinforcement Learning [114.07623388322048]
  We discuss how the standard goal-conditioned RL (GCRL) is encapsulated by the objective variational empowerment. Our work lays a novel foundation from which to evaluate, analyze, and develop representation learning techniques in goal-based RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T18:12:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.