The Virtues of Brevity: Avoid Overthinking in Parallel Test-Time Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21067v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:47:17 GMT
• Title: The Virtues of Brevity: Avoid Overthinking in Parallel Test-Time Reasoning
• Authors: Raul Cavalcante Dinardi, Bruno Yamamoto, Anna Helena Reali Costa, Artur Jordao,
• Abstract summary: We show that the simple and counterintuitive of selecting the shortest solution is highly effective.<n>We confirm that this approach is competitive with complex methods such as self-consistency.
• Score: 0.7874708385247352
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reasoning models represent a significant advance in LLM capabilities, particularly for complex reasoning tasks such as mathematics and coding. Previous studies confirm that parallel test-time compute-sampling multiple solutions and selecting the best one-can further enhance the predictive performance of LLMs. However, strategies in this area often require complex scoring, thus increasing computational cost and complexity. In this work, we demonstrate that the simple and counterintuitive heuristic of selecting the shortest solution is highly effective. We posit that the observed effectiveness stems from models operating in two distinct regimes: a concise, confident conventional regime and a verbose overthinking regime characterized by uncertainty, and we show evidence of a critical point where the overthinking regime begins to be significant. By selecting the shortest answer, the heuristic preferentially samples from the conventional regime. We confirm that this approach is competitive with more complex methods such as self-consistency across two challenging benchmarks while significantly reducing computational overhead. The shortest-answer heuristic provides a Pareto improvement over self-consistency and applies even to tasks where output equality is not well defined.

Related papers

• Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning via Reward-Guided Dual-Phase Search [62.1546099504045]
  We propose a dual-phase test-time scaling framework that separates reasoning into planning and execution.<n>Specifically, we decompose reasoning trajectories and develop reward models for each phase, enabling the search to explore and prune plans and executions separately.<n> Experiments on both mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently improves accuracy while reducing computation redundant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T19:27:23Z)
• From Long to Short: LLMs Excel at Trimming Own Reasoning Chains [48.692414597960244]
  O1/R1 style large reasoning models (LRMs) signal a substantial leap forward over conventional instruction-following LLMs.<n>Recent studies show that LRMs are prone to suffer from overthinking.<n>We propose a test-time scaling method, EDIT, which efficiently guides LRMs to identify the shortest correct reasoning paths at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T19:00:44Z)
• Learning to Refine: Self-Refinement of Parallel Reasoning in LLMs [102.48588475875749]
  We introduce Generative Self-Refinement (GSR), a novel parallel test-time scaling framework.<n>GSR generates a set of candidate responses in parallel and then performs self-refinement to synthesize a new superior solution.<n>We show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across five mathematical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T06:51:48Z)
• OptimalThinkingBench: Evaluating Over and Underthinking in LLMs [61.90251858867122]
  Thinking LLMs solve complex tasks at the expense of increased compute and overthinking on simpler problems.<n>Non-thinking LLMs are faster and cheaper but underthink on harder reasoning problems.<n>We introduce OptimalThinkingBench, a unified benchmark that jointly evaluates overthinking and underthinking in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T17:53:10Z)
• Promoting Efficient Reasoning with Verifiable Stepwise Reward [7.385337642642193]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have recently achieved significant progress in complex reasoning tasks, aided by reinforcement learning.<n>LRMs often suffer from overthinking, expending excessive computation on simple problems and reducing efficiency.<n>We propose a novel rule-based verifiable stepwise reward mechanism (VSRM), which assigns rewards based on the performance of intermediate states in the reasoning trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T02:43:53Z)
• Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs [45.83245433138508]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly progressed into general-purpose agents capable of solving a broad spectrum of tasks.<n>They apply fixed inference-time compute regardless of task complexity, often overthinking simple problems while underthinking hard ones.<n>This survey presents a comprehensive review of efficient test-time compute strategies, which aim to improve the computational efficiency of LLM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T18:27:42Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• Solve-Detect-Verify: Inference-Time Scaling with Flexible Generative Verifier [13.980380294971093]
  Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning for complex tasks inherently involves a trade-off between solution accuracy and computational efficiency.<n>We introduce FlexiVe, a novel generative verifier that balances flexibly computational resources between rapid, reliable fast thinking and meticulous slow thinking.<n>Experiments show FlexiVe achieves superior accuracy in pinpointing errors within reasoning traces on ProcessBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T11:41:44Z)
• Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certainty [75.1351701045874]
  Best-of-N selection is a key technique for improving the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose self-certainty, a novel and efficient metric that leverages the inherent probability distribution of LLM outputs to estimate response quality without requiring external reward models.<n>Our findings establish self-certainty as a practical and efficient way for improving LLM reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T19:08:07Z)
• BRiTE: Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process to Enhance Language Model Reasoning [78.63421517563056]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks.<n>We present a unified probabilistic framework that formalizes LLM reasoning through a novel graphical model.<n>We introduce the Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process (BRiTE) algorithm, which works in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T02:39:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.